Guide to the NQF
The Guide to the National Quality Framework (NQF) is designed to help education and care providers, educators and authorised officers understand and apply the requirements of the NQF.
The Guide is not legal advice and should be read in conjunction with the National Law and Regulations, which take precedence over any guidance.
How to use the Guide
The Guide provides information for all types of service in all states and territories. It is not intended to be read from cover to cover, nor is all of the information within it relevant to every service. Rather, it has been designed as a comprehensive reference document to be referred to when seeking guidance on particular matters, such as applications and approvals, operational requirements, and the National Quality Standard.
The Guide has also been designed as an online PDF document and will be updated as required. Any changes to the Guide will be added at the bottom of this page.
Along with ensuring that you will always be referring to the latest version of the Guide, another benefit of using the online PDF is that it enables you to quickly and easily search for content by key word(s).
Accessing the Guide
Download your copy:
- Full version Guide to the NQF (4.2 MB)
- Access a list of publications for further reading.
Changes to the Guide
This Guide will be regularly updated with additional advice and improved guidance.
To ensure you have the most up to date information we suggest you always view the online version. Any changes to the Guide will be added to the below table.
Download a print-friendly summary of the 2020 regulation amendments
Download a print-friendly copy of the table of changes
Release date | Chapter | Section/s | Summary of change |
---|---|---|---|
Feb-24 | Throughout | Throughout | Updating of existing wording and new text regarding changes to the NQG, fees and the national Approved Learning Frameworks V2.0. From 1 February 2024 the original versions of both frameworks will no longer be approved for use under the NQF. |
Oct-23 | Throughout | Throughout | Updating of existing wording and new text regarding changes to the NQF taking effect from 1 October 2023 and regarding the refreshed approved learning frameworks. |
Jul-23 | Throughout | Throughout | Updating of existing wording and new text regarding changes to the NQF taking effect from 1 July 2023. |
Mar-23 | 3: National Quality Standard and Assessment and Rating 4: Operational Requirements All | Throughout | Updating of existing wording and new text regarding new transportation requirements for centre-based services from 1 March 2023 from page 168 and from page 388. New text and hyperlinks regarding the updated national approved learning frameworks. Services may use Belonging, Being and Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia Version 2.0 and My Time, Our Place: Framework for School Age Care in Australia Version 2.0 from 2023 onwards. The original versions of both frameworks will be revoked from 1 February 2024. Updating of existing wording and new text regarding notice of an assessment and rating visit on page 322 and partial reassessments on page 329. |
May-22 | 3: National Quality Standard | All Standards | Amendment of hyperlinks at pages 141, 178, 204, 226, 250, 279 and 313. |
March-22 | 4: Operational Requirements | 4.2 – Educator Qualifications | Amendment of existing wording at pages 413, 414 , 416, 418, 419 and 420. |
Sept-20 | 3: National Quality Standard | 1 – Exceeding NQS theme guidance | The general Exceeding guidance, previously found on pages 331-336, has been moved to pages 93-99, and some edits made including the insertion of questions that are used by authorised officers to establish Exceeding NQS practice. |
Sept-20 | 3: National Quality Standard | All standards | In the Exceeding guidance for each Standard found on pages 114, 126, 141, 163, 178, 190, 204, 217, 226, 240, 250, 266, 279, 299 and 313, former Exceeding indicators for assessors have been reworded into reflective questions for services. The guidance also directs readers to the bank of Exceeding case studies available on ACECQA’s Exceeding the NQS web page. |
Sept-20 | 2: Applications and Approvals 3: National Quality Standard and Assessment and Rating 4: Operational Requirements 5: Regulatory Authority Powers 7: Glossary | Throughout | Updating of existing wording and insertion of new text at pages 37, 156, 166, 168-170, 173, 295, 360, 361, 363-5, 379, 381-6, 388, 438, 454, 456, 577, and 631. These changes relate to the introduction of new regulatory requirements for transportation of children outside an excursion, including a requirement for policies and procedures, risk assessments and written authorisations – regulations 168(2)(ga) and 102B-D. The new regulations are now included at page 168 under Element 2.2.1: Supervision. A new section 2.14: Transportation was added at pages 382-5. A new section 2.15: Other important factors relating to the safe transportation of children was added at pages 385-6. The new regulations are now included at page 388 under 2:16 Responsibilities of the Approved Provider, Nominated Supervisor and Family Day Care Educator; at page 454 under 7.1: Policies and Procedures; and at page 577 under Attachment B: Summary of Offences under the National Regulations. A minor change was made to the definition of ‘regular outing’ at page 631. A new definition of ‘regular transportation’ was inserted at page 631. Existing Part 2.13: Excursions at pages 380- 2 was also updated to include references to new regulatory requirements for transportation of children during an excursion – regulations 100(2)(d) and 102(4). |
Sept-20 | 3: National Quality Standard and Assessment and Rating 4: Operational Requirements | 4.1.1 – Organisation of educators
4.4 – Educator to child ratios
4.2.3 – Qualification requirements for centre-based services with children preschool age or under | Deletion of references to Regulations 322 and 323 on pages 212 – as they are repealed – bringing South Australia in line with national requirements for educator to child ratios at centre-based services under Regulation 123(1)(c). Deletion of the reference to a saving provision in South Australia at page 429 (see above).
Addition of text at page 418 clarifying that an existing three-month probationary period for new educators working without an approved qualification under Regulation 126(1A) now applies in South Australia |
Sept-20 | 4: Operational Requirements | 3.16 – Assessment of family day care residences and approved family day care venues | Addition of text at page 401 clarifying that a family day care educator need not reside at the residence from which they provide education and care. |
Sept-20 | 4: Operational Requirements | 7.4 – Management of records | Addition of text at pages 475-6 clarifying the requirements for public liability insurance minimum cover under Regulations 29 and 30. |
Sept-20 | 3: National Quality Standard and Assessment and Rating 4: Operational Requirements | Throughout | Addition of references to Educational Leader Resource and Self-Assessment tool |
Sept-20 | All | Throughout | Fixed typos, updated titling etc. – 1, 3, 92, 95, 97, 169, 416, 417, 473. 92-371 – chapter name update from Guide to National Quality Standard to National Quality Standard. 93-315 – Capitalise Standard as required. |
Jan-20 | 4: Operational Requirements | Quality Area 4: Staffing arrangements and mainly 4.1 – 4.5 | Amended sections on requirement for second ECT or ‘suitably qualified person’ in centre-based services with 60 or more preschool age or younger children |
Jan-20 | 2: Applications and Approvals | 1.1 - Application for provider approval | Further clarification of approved providers who are not individuals and persons with management and control |
Tell us what you think
ACECQA values your feedback on the Guide to the NQF to ensure the information is accurate and helpful.
Your feedback and suggestions will help us to refine this product. Email our Sector Information Services Team at [email protected].
Icons legend
National Law and Regulations |
|
Centre-based service An education and care service other than a family day care service which includes most long day care, preschool and outside school hours care services that are delivered at a centre. |
|
Birth to three Children birth to three years of age. |
|
Offence Offences against the National Law that attract a penalty, for example a fine. |
|
Family day care service An education and care service that is delivered through the use of two or more educators to provide education and care to children and operates from two or more residences. |
|
School age children Includes children attending school in the year before grade 1, and above. |
|
Sight Authorised officers will sight documentation provided as evidence to support particular practices at the service (for example, records of attendance, enrolment records, policies and procedures, meeting minutes, safety checklists, newsletters, photos, collections of children’s work and documentation of child assessments or evaluations). |
|
Observe Authorised officers will observe what children, families, educators, co-ordinators and staff members are doing (for example, engaging in caring, friendly and respectful interactions). |
|
Discuss Authorised officers will discuss why and how particular practices occur at the service, with the approved provider, nominated supervisor, educators, co-ordinators, family day care educators, assistants or staff members. |
|
State icons TAS WA NSW SA QLD NT VIC ACT Information that is specific to a state or territory. |
Section 1: Introduction
Purpose of guide
This guide aims to support education and care service providers, authorised officers and other regulatory authority staff understand the requirements under the National Quality Framework (NQF).
The guide should always be read with the Education and Care Services National Law (National Law) and the Education and Care Services National Regulations (National Regulations). It is not legal advice, and the National Law and Regulations take precedence over any material in this guide. Education and care services located in Western Australia must check state specific regulatory references.
The guide is regularly reviewed and updated by the Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA) in consultation with regulatory authorities and the Australian Government. Updates are published on the ACECQA website at www.acecqa.gov.au.
This guide sometimes suggests other sources of information which readers may find useful.
The National Quality Framework
The NQF was the result of an agreement between all Australian governments to work together to provide better educational and developmental outcomes for children.
The NQF introduced a new quality standard in 2012 to improve education and care across long day care, family day care, preschool/kindergarten and outside school hours care services.
The NQF aims to raise quality and drive continuous improvement and consistency in children’s education and care services through:
- the National Law and National Regulations
- the National Quality Standard
- an assessment and quality rating process
- national approved learning frameworks
- a regulatory authority in each state and territory responsible for the approval, monitoring and quality assessment of services in their state or territory
- a national body – ACECQA, which guides the implementation of the NQF and works with regulatory authorities.
The delivery of the NQF is guided by set objectives and guidelines to ensure consistent and effective function.
The objectives of the NQF are to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The guiding principles of the NQF are as follows:
The rights and best interests of the child are paramount
The NQF aligns with the United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child. This treaty ensures that children have the right to be heard, to be free from violence, abuse and neglect, to have the opportunity to thrive, to be engaged in civics and citizenship and opportunities to take action and be accountable. A rights-based approach to delivering education and care means understanding these rights and implementing practice which reflects them.
The Royal Commission into Institutional Reponses to Child Sexual Abuse recommended all institutions working with children should implement the National Child Safe Principles. The National Child Safe Principles are embedded throughout the NQF, and speak to an organisational culture that fosters child safety, wellbeing and cultural safety within physical and online environments. A child focused approach takes action to promote child wellbeing and prevent harm to children and young people in all aspects of service operation.
Children are successful, competent and capable learners
The NQF views all children as capable learners who actively construct their own understandings and contribute to others’ learning. It recognises children’s agency, capacity to initiate and lead learning, and their rights to participate in decisions that affect them, including their learning.
Viewing children as active participants and decision makers opens up possibilities for educators to move beyond pre-conceived expectations about what children can achieve. This requires educators to respect and work with each child’s unique qualities and abilities.
Equity, inclusion and diversity underpin the framework
The NQF recognises all children’s capacity and right to succeed regardless of diverse circumstances, cultural background and abilities. Inclusion is acknowledged as an approach where diversity is celebrated. It requires educators to hold high expectations for the learning, development and wellbeing of all children, recognising that every child treads an individual learning path and will progress in different and equally meaningful ways.
In recognising each child’s experience of learning and development, educators implement responsive, equitable, individualised opportunities, additional support and reasonable adjustments if barriers to success are identified.
Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures are valued
The NQF is underpinned by a commitment to ‘Closing the Gap’ and acknowledges Australia is a nation of great diversity, and an ancient land that has been cared for by Indigenous Australians for many thousands of years. Education and care services have a shared responsibility to contribute to building a better society and sustainable environment and to support children, families, colleagues and the local community to understand, respect and value diversity. Educators take every opportunity to extend children’s understanding of their local context and of their wider world. Educators respectfully engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to explore how to embed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives in the philosophy of the setting, their planning and implementation of curriculum. Through all aspects of their practice, educators challenge stereotyping and bias. They find sensitive and respectful ways to negotiate tensions that may arise, for instance, because of differing values, beliefs and expectations within the local context of the service, and between the local context and the broader contexts of Australian society.
The role of parents and families is respected and supported
The NQF acknowledges a view of children in the context of their family and community, that families are children’s first and most influential teachers. It is envisaged that education and care services will actively seek out partnerships and develop secure respectful relationships to ensure that families are informed, consulted and supported in regards to their child’s learning, development and wellbeing.
Best practice is expected in the provision of education and care services
Inherent within the NQF is a commitment to continuous improvement and striving for best practice underpins this commitment. While the NQF does not prescribe what best practice looks like, it encourages education and care services to draw on a range of current research, theory and understandings about early and middle childhood. This can provide educators with an understanding of best and most suitable practice in the unique and changing context of their service.
The National Law and National Regulations
The Education and Care Services National Law (National Law) and the Education and Care Services National Regulations (National Regulations) apply to most long day care, family day care, kindergarten/preschool and outside school hours care services in Australia. The law and regulations detail the operational and legal requirements for an education and care service.
The National Quality Standard
The National Quality Standard (NQS) is part of the National Regulations.
The NQS sets a national benchmark for the quality of education and care services and includes seven quality areas that are important to outcomes for children:
QA1 | Educational program and practice |
QA2 | Children’s health and safety |
QA3 | Physical environment |
QA4 | Staffing arrangements |
QA5 | Relationships with children |
QA6 | Collaborative partnerships with families and communities |
QA7 | Governance and leadership |
The NQS contains two or three standards in each quality area. These standards are high-level outcome statements. Under each standard are elements that describe the outcomes that contribute to the standard being achieved. Each standard and element is represented by a concept that support education and care services to navigate and reflect on the NQS.
Assessment and rating of services
Services are assessed and rated by their regulatory authority against the NQS, and given a rating for each of the seven quality areas and an overall rating based on these results.
The quality ratings are published on the national registers on the ACECQA website (www.acecqa.gov.au) and on the Starting Blocks website (www.startingblocks.gov.au).
Approved learning frameworks
The NQS is linked to approved learning frameworks that recognise children learn from birth. Services are required to base their educational program on an approved learning framework.
The delivery of the NQF is guided by set objectives and guidelines to ensure consistent and effective function.
There is also a jurisdiction-specific approved learning framework in Victoria. The delivery of the NQF is guided by set objectives and guidelines to ensure consistent and effective
Governance arrangements under the NQF
Ministerial Council |
The Ministerial Council is made up of the Australian Government and state and territory government ministers responsible for education, including early childhood education and care. The Ministerial Council: |
|
|
|
Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority |
ACECQA is a statutory authority which guides and monitors the implementation and administration of the NQF to promote consistency across all states and territories. ACECQA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State/territory based regulatory authorities |
Regulatory authorities have day-to-day contact with education and care providers and services and: |
|
|
|
|
Section 2: Applications and Approvals
Provider and service approvals
There are two main approval processes:
- Provider approval – a person may apply to obtain a provider approval, which is ongoing and recognised nationally. A person who has applied for a provider approval may also apply for a service approval to operate one or more services.
- Service approval – each service operated by an approved provider requires service approval. Service approvals relate to the individual site/premises and the type of care provided.
This section explains how applications are made and processed.
1. Provider approval
A person must have provider approval to operate an education and care service under the National Law and Regulations.
Regulatory authorities are responsible for assessing and determining provider approval applications.
1.1 Application for provider approval
WA An individual, body corporate, eligible association, partnership or prescribed entity may apply to be an approved provider. See the Glossary for the meaning of these terms.
The application must include all information listed in the National Regulations and payment of the set fee. See Application checklists – Tables I, II and Fees.
Applications by individuals
The application must be sent to the regulatory authority in the state or territory where the applicant/s live.
Applications by non-individuals
When an applicant is not an individual, section 12(2)(b) of the National Law requires the applicant to satisfy the regulatory authority that the applicant is a fit and proper person to be involved in the provision of an education and care service.
When assessing the fitness and propriety of a non-individual applicant for provider approval, regulatory authorities may assess all members of the applicant entity for fitness and propriety, regardless of whether the person is determined by the approved provider to be a person with management or control.
Persons with management or control of an education and care service
When an applicant is not an individual, section 12(2)(a) of the National Law requires the applicant to satisfy the regulatory authority that each person who will be a person with management or control at the service is a fit and proper person.
A non-individual applicant for provider approval can include:
- a corporate body (this includes an incorporated association, statutory corporation, etc.)
- unincorporated associations (for example, a cooperative)
- partnerships, and
- government bodies.
An application by a non-individual applicant must be sent to the regulatory authority in the state or territory where the applicant’s principal office is located (or where any of the applicants’ principal offices are located if there is more than one).
Who is a person with management or control?
The persons who meet the definition of person with management or control will differ, depending on the structure of the entity intending to become an approved provider.
If the intending provider is a body corporate – a person with management or control is each officer of the body corporate (within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 of the Commonwealth) who has authority or responsibility for, or significant influence over, the planning, direction or control of the activities or the delivery of the service.
If the intending provider is an eligible association – a person with management or control is each member of the executive committee of the association who has authority or responsibility for, or significant influence over, the planning, direction or control of the activities or the delivery of the service.
If the intending provider is a partnership – a person with management or control is each partner who has authority or responsibility for, or significant influence over, the planning, direction or control of the activities or the delivery of the service.
A person with management or control may also be any other person who is a member of the group of persons responsible for the executive decisions made in relation to the service, or who has authority or responsibility for, or significant influence over, the planning, direction or control of the activities or delivery of the service, is also a person with management or control.
In this context, ‘management or control’ refers to the executive, management, financial and/or business decisions made by, or on behalf of, the approved provider – in relation to delivery of an education and care service. A person with management or control refers to a person who has the responsibility, alone or with others, to make, or participate in making, decisions that affect the business of the entity or who has the capacity to significantly influence the entity’s financial standing.
For companies, this will generally include directors, and for committees and associations, it will usually include executive members or office bearers. It may also include persons in senior management roles within the approved provider or entity, or a person or company engaged by the approved provider to operate the service on its behalf. Examples include a state manager, chief financial officer, quality manager, or another person who has the power to direct a centre manager or a nominated supervisor.
While a person such as a centre manager or a nominated supervisor may have ‘day-to-day charge’ of a service, they may not be a person with management or control if they do not make decisions, or participate in decision-making, of the kind described here.
To assess the fitness and propriety of a non-individual applicant for provider approval, regulatory authorities should assess all members of the applicant entity for fitness and propriety, regardless of whether the person is determined by the approved provider to be a person with management or control.
Members of the applicant entity include company directors, executive members of an association, and partners of a partnership.
In some circumstances, an officer of an approved provider entity may not be a person with management or control. For example, a company director or an executive committee member may not fit the definition of person with management or control if, in their role, they do not have authority, responsibility or significant influence for, or control over the delivery of, an education and care service.
In these circumstances, the officer or member of the approved provider entity can expressly indicate in writing to the regulatory authority that they will not have management or control of the service. The regulatory authority has the discretion to determine whether the officer meets the definition of persons with management or control.
If the application for provider approval is granted, it is an offence under section 173 of the National Law for the approved provider to fail to notify the regulatory authority of any appointment or removal of a person with management or control of any service operated by the provider. This offence may attract a $4,000 penalty if the approved provider is an individual, or $20,000 if the approved provider is not an individual.
Incomplete applications
The timeframe for processing an application does not begin until an application is 'valid', meaning complete with all prescribed information.
If an application does not include all prescribed information the regulatory authority may treat the application as invalid and either request missing information be provided within a set timeframe, or close the invalid application.
The National Law does not specify how much time applicants have to provide this information once requested by a regulatory authority. Regulatory authorities will set timeframes taking into consideration:
- the amount and complexity of the information requested
- the applicant’s capacity to provide information in that timeframe
- whether a timeframe applies to when the applicant must submit the application.
Regulatory authorities must keep records of incomplete applications. The State Records Act 1998 (NSW) applies to all states and territories for the purposes of the National Law and Regulations except to the extent that the National Law applies to a regulatory authority and the records of a regulatory authority (section 265).
Timeframe for assessing an application
The regulatory authority must make a decision within 60 calendar days of receiving a complete application.
If more information is requested, the time taken to provide additional information is not included in the 60-day period. This includes if the regulatory authority requires the applicant to undergo an oral or written assessment. If this occurs, the time taken from the point of the invitation to undergo that assessment, through to the result of that assessment being made available to the regulatory authority, is not included in the 60 day period.
If the applicant agrees, the 60-day period (not including any time taken to provide additional information or to carry out a knowledge assessment) may be extended by up to 30 calendar days.
If a decision is not made within 60 calendar days, the application is taken to be refused.
The regulatory authority must give the applicant written notice of its decision and the supporting reasons, within seven (7) calendar days of making the decision.
Calculating time
The National Law sets out how timeframes are calculated at schedule 1, clause 31.
An application cannot begin to be processed unless the application is complete/valid and includes all the required information.
When calculating the timeframe, the day the application is received is excluded. If the timeframe is expressed in the legislation in terms of a number of days, the last day of that timeframe is also excluded. ‘Day’ means calendar day. For example, a regulatory authority must make a decision on a provider approval application within 60 days after the application is received (see section 15). If the regulatory authority receives the application on 1 March, the 60-day timeframe commences on 2 March and runs until the end of 1 May. 1 March is excluded from the calculation, and 30 April, the 60th day, is also excluded.
If the last day of the timeframe falls on a non-business day, the next business day will be the last day. Using the example above, if 1 May is a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday, the regulatory authority’s decision will be due the first working day after 1 May.
1.2 Considering an application for fitness and propriety
When reviewing an application for provider approval, the regulatory authority will consider:
- if the applicant is a fit and proper person to provide an education and care service
- the applicant’s history of compliance or criminal history
- whether the applicant is bankrupt or other financial or medical matters which may limit their capacity to meet their obligations under the National Law.
There may be other circumstances in which a person is considered not to be fit and proper.
Is the applicant a fit and proper person?
Provider approval will not be granted unless the regulatory authority is satisfied the applicant, and/or each person with management or control, is fit and proper to provide an education and care service.
The head of a government department administering an education law is taken to be a fit and proper person.
The regulatory authority may ask the applicant for more information or make enquiries to assess whether they are fit and proper. This may be in relation to their history of compliance, criminal history or any other relevant matter. Regulatory authorities may require the applicant and/or persons with management or control to undergo an oral or written assessment of the person’s knowledge of the NQF. If more information is requested or the applicant is required to undertake an assessment, the time taken to fulfill the request or for the result of that assessment being made available to the regulatory authority is not included in the period for determining the application.
Refusal or cancellation of provider approval under the Commonwealth Family Assistance Law (FAL) is grounds for suspension or cancellation of a provider approval under the National Law where the FAL refusal or cancellation relates to fitness and propriety or a breach of the NQF. For example, if FAL approval has been cancelled because of non-compliance with a law of the Commonwealth, the regulatory authority may decide to cancel the provider's approval under the National Law.
If the regulatory authority obtains information from a source other than from the applicant and is considering making a decision that will adversely affect the applicant, principles of natural justice must be taken into account. Decisions that adversely affect a person include refusing to grant provider approval or granting provider approval subject to conditions. For more information (see Good Regulatory Practice – Good decision-making).
It is the applicant’s responsibility to identify each individual who will be in management or control (see Glossary). For companies, this will generally include directors, and for committees and associations it will usually include executive members. Generally, a person with management or control is someone:
Therefore, while a person – such as a centre manager or nominated supervisor – may have ‘day to day charge’ of a service, they may not be a person with management or control of a provider. |
History of compliance
When determining whether a person is fit and proper, the regulatory authority must consider:
- the person’s history of compliance with any current or former education and care services law, children’s services law or education law
- any decision made under a former education and care services law, a children’s services law or an education law of any state or territory to refuse, refuse to renew, suspend or cancel a provider approval, registration or certification issued to the person under that law.
If a person has been served with an infringement notice for an offence under the National Law and has paid the penalty, the offence cannot be taken into account when determining the person’s fitness and propriety (section 291).
The National Law does not specify a time period in relation to a person’s compliance history. When considering a person’s history of compliance the regulatory authority may consider:
- the severity of any issues and how recently they occurred
- the person’s willingness to comply, for example, whether escalation was required to resolve compliance issues. See also Good Regulatory Practice – Good decision-making.
Criminal history
Regulatory authorities must consider the person’s criminal history when determining whether they are fit and proper to be involved in providing an education and care service. Because working with children/vulnerable people legislation differs between states and territories, the National Law includes two options for considering a person’s criminal history, set out below.
Matters the regulatory authority must consider about criminal history |
|
Option 1 | Option 2 |
The regulatory authority must consider the below matters, to the extent that they may affect the person’s suitability to provide an education and care service:
|
The regulatory authority must consider the person’s working with vulnerable people check. |
In some instances, a check may show information about a person’s criminal history that is not relevant to whether they are fit and proper. Regulatory authorities must not take into account irrelevant information which may lead to an unlawful decision (see Good Regulatory Practice – Good decision-making).
Financial matters
Regulatory authorities must consider whether the applicant is bankrupt or has applied to take the benefit of any law for the relief of bankrupt or insolvent debtors. In the case of a body corporate, the regulatory authority must consider whether the applicant is insolvent under administration or an externally-administered body corporate.
Regulatory authorities may also consider whether the applicant’s financial circumstances may limit their capacity to meet their obligations under the National Law.
Applicant is bankrupt or insolvent
If the applicant is bankrupt or insolvent according to their declaration, the regulatory authority may consider:
- the period when bankruptcy is discharged
- past circumstances and changes of circumstances
- legal advice about whether the regulatory authority is bound by other law.
The National Personal Insolvency Index, maintained by the Australian Financial Security Authority (Australian Government), may have information about an applicant’s financial position and can be accessed at: www.afsa.gov.au.
Concerns about financial circumstances
Where there are concerns about an applicant’s financial circumstances, raised through the initial application, notification or other sources of information, the regulatory authority may ask an applicant to provide more information about their financial capacity, to determine the likelihood that they will be able to sustain ongoing operation of a service. For example, information about:
- liquidity
- cash flow
- asset sustainability
- capital structure and debt protection
- operating efficiency.
Regulatory authorities may make inquiries for more information to determine if a person is fit and proper. This includes seeking additional information from an external expert, for example about the financial viability of an applicant to help assess the applicant’s financial capacity.
Although there is a duty of confidentiality (section 273), a regulatory authority can disclose information when assessing a provider approval application.
Medical conditions
The regulatory authority may consider whether the person has a medical condition that may limit their capacity to meet their obligations under the National Law.
Applicants are not required to provide medical information in their initial application. However, the regulatory authority can ask for additional information, such as an assessment by a medical practitioner if concerned about the applicant’s capacity. The regulatory authority will detail why the assessment is needed and give a description of the role, to guide the person doing the assessment. The regulatory authority may require a written report.
Management capability
The regulatory authority may consider whether the person has the management capability to operate an education and care service in accordance with the National Law and National Regulations.
Evidence of management capability does not need to relate only to education and care services, or qualifications in education and care. Evidence of management capability may be related to any previous expertise, experience or qualification in a leadership, governance, administrative or management role in:
- a business, or
- a not-for-profit organisation, or
- a sporting or social club, or
- a community-based committee.
This may include experience gained as a volunteer.
Actions taken under Family Assistance Law
In assessing an applicant's fitness and propriety, the regulatory authority may also take into account certain actions taken under Commonwealth Family Assistance Law (FAL), including sanctions and suspensions.
Refusal or cancellation of provider approval under the FAL is grounds for suspension or cancellation of a provider approval under the National Law, where the FAL refusal or cancellation relates to fitness and propriety or a breach of the NQF.
Conditions on provider approval
A condition is a requirement that the person holding the approval must comply with to avoid committing an offence under the National Law.
A provider approval is granted subject to the condition that the approved provider complies with the National Law. It may also be granted subject to other conditions imposed. For example, if there are concerns about an applicant’s management capacity, the regulatory authority may limit the number of services or size of services the applicant can operate.
A condition applies to the provider unless the condition expressly provides otherwise.
See Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement – Conditions for more information about using conditions on a provider approval.
Determining an application
The regulatory authority must give the applicant written notice of its decision and the supporting reasons, within seven (7) calendar days of making the decision (see Timeframe for assessing an application).
Granting provider approval
If granted, the regulatory authority must give the approved provider a copy of the provider approval, stating:
- the name of the approved provider
- if the approved provider is not an individual, the address of the principal office of the approved provider
- any conditions to which the approval is subject (see Conditions on provider approval)
- the date the provider approval was granted
- the provider approval number.
The National Law does not specify how much time the regulatory authority has to give the approved provider a copy of the provider approval but it must be done as soon as possible.
Refusing to grant provider approval
The regulatory authority may refuse to grant provider approval if it is not satisfied that the grounds for granting provider approval are met and the applicant is fit and proper (see Considering an application).
Appeals
A decision to refuse to grant a provider approval, or to grant provider approval subject to conditions, is a reviewable decision under the National Law (see Reviews).
After an application has been determined
Publication on the register of approved providers
ACECQA must keep and publish a register of approved providers which includes the information set out below.
The regulatory authority may publish the name of the approved provider.
Information on the register of approved providers |
The name of the approved provider |
The postal address of the approved provider |
Any conditions on the approval |
The date the provider approval was granted |
The provider approval number |
The service approval numbers of all education and care services provided by the approved provider. |
Duration and effect of provider approval
A provider approval authorises the holder to operate an approved education and care service and an associated children’s service. It is valid nationally and is ongoing unless cancelled or suspended by the regulatory authority, or surrendered by the approved provider.
In Western Australia, a provider approval granted to an individual is also ongoing until the individual dies.
Reassessing fitness and propriety
The regulatory authority may reassess the fitness and propriety of an approved provider or person with management or control at any time. The approved provider or person with management or control may be required to undergo an oral or written assessment of their knowledge of the NQF. If a person is no longer a fit and proper person, the provider approval may be suspended or cancelled (see Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement).
1.3 Amending provider approval on application
An approved provider may apply to the regulatory authority for an amendment to their provider approval. The application must be in writing and include:
- the approved provider’s full name and provider approval number
- the name and contact details for the application
- details of the amendment applied for
- sufficient information or documentation to support the application for amendment.
The National Law and Regulations do not specify the type or level of information needed to support an application for an amendment, however information must be sufficient for the regulatory authority to make a decision.
Incomplete applications
If an application does not include all the required information, the regulatory authority may treat the application as invalid. The timeframe for processing an application does not begin until an application is complete and therefore valid.
Timeframe for assessing an application
A decision must be made within 30 calendar days of the regulatory authority receiving a complete application.
Calculating time
The National Law sets out how timeframes are calculated at schedule 1, clause 31. An application cannot begin to be processed unless the application is complete/valid and includes all the required information.
Considering an application
The regulatory authority may only amend a provider approval after consulting with the regulatory authority of each jurisdiction where the provider operates an education and care service. This includes the regulatory authority which granted the provider approval. Failure to consult other regulatory authorities does not affect the validity of the regulatory authority’s decision.
Determining an application
Once the regulatory authority has received a complete application, it must decide to:
- amend the provider approval in the way that was applied for; or
- amend the provider approval in another way, with the applicant’s written approval; or
- refuse the amendment of the provider approval.
An amendment may include a change to a condition of the provider approval or introduce a new condition.
Appeals
A decision to refuse to amend a provider approval is a reviewable decision under the National Law. Refer to Reviews.
After approval has been amended
If the regulatory authority amends the approval, it must give the approved provider a copy. The regulatory authority must also make any necessary amendments to any service approval held by the approved provider and give the approved provider a copy.
1.4 Amending provider approval without application
The regulatory authority may amend a provider approval at any time, without application from the approved provider.
Amendment may include varying a condition on the provider approval or imposing a new condition.
The regulatory authority may only amend a provider approval after consulting with the regulatory authority of each jurisdiction where the provider operates an education and care service. This includes the regulatory authority which granted the provider approval. Failure to consult other regulatory authorities does not affect the validity of the regulatory authority’s decision.
After approval has been amended
The regulatory authority must give the approved provider written notice of the amendment.
Amendment without application takes effect 14 calendar days after the regulatory authority notifies the approved provider of the amendment, or at the end of another period specified by the regulatory authority.
The regulatory authority must give the approved provider a copy of the amended provider approval. It must also make any necessary amendments to any service approval held by the approved provider and give the approved provider a copy.
Appeals
A decision to amend a provider approval is a reviewable decision under the National Law (see Reviews).
1.5 Determining an application for provider approval in case of death or incapacity of approved provider
If an approved provider can no longer fulfil their role due to death or incapacity, a nominated executor, legal personal representative or guardian can be appointed, subject to meeting the requirements, as the approved provider.
The regulatory authority may receive an application from the executor for a provider approval.
If an approved provider becomes incapacitated, their legal personal representative or guardian may apply to the regulatory authority for a provider approval.
A nominated supervisor or a person in day-to-day charge of an education and care service operated by the approved provider must notify the regulatory authority within seven (7) calendar days if the approved provider dies.
The executor of the approved provider’s estate may continue to operate any approved service for the relevant period, if at least one nominated supervisor continues to manage the day-to-day operation of the service. ‘Relevant period’ means 30 calendar days after the death of the approved provider or, if the executor applies for a provider approval, until the regulatory authority determines the application.
In Western Australia, an executor includes a person entitled to a grant of letters of administration to the intestate estate of an approved provider, in addition to a person who has been granted letters of administration or probate or has been named executor in the approved provider’s will.
How does an executor, legal representative or guardian apply?
An application must be made in writing and include payment of the set fee.
An application from an executor must be made within 30 calendar days of the provider’s death. The National Regulations specify information that must be included in an application (see Application checklists – Tables III, IV, V, VI).
Because a provider approval granted to an executor, legal personal representative or guardian only relates to the service formerly operated by the deceased or incapacitated approved provider, the person cannot apply for any additional service approvals, or receive a service approval transferred from another approved provider.
Incomplete applications
If an application does not include all the required information, the regulatory authority may treat the application as invalid. The timeframe for processing an application does not begin until an application is complete and therefore valid.
For more information refer to Incomplete applications in Application for provider approval.
Considering an application
The regulatory authority must consider whether the applicant is a fit and proper person to be involved in the provision of an education and care service. See the requirements set out above at Considering an application for fitness and propriety. The provider approval will not be granted to an executor, personal legal representative or guardian; unless they are fit and proper.
Determining an application
The regulatory authority may grant the provider approval, grant the approval subject to conditions, or refuse to grant the provider approval. Approval may be granted for a period of not more than six months, and may be extended or further extended for periods of not more than six months at the regulatory authority's discretion.
If granted, it is only in relation to the services that were operated by the approved provider where the applicant is the executor, personal legal representative or guardian.
Appeals
A decision to refuse to grant a provider approval is a reviewable decision under the National Law (see Reviews).
After approval has been granted
The regulatory authority must give the approved provider a copy of the provider approval.
A service approval is not suspended during any period that a person is approved to manage or control the education and care service in the event that the approved provider dies or becomes incapacitated.
1.6 Voluntary suspension of provider approval
An approved provider can apply to the regulatory authority to voluntary suspend – put ‘on hold’ their provider approval – for up to 12 months.
During that time the person must not operate an education and care service.
The approved provider must apply for voluntary suspension in writing.
The National Regulations specify information that must be included in an application to suspend provider approval (see Application checklists – Table VII).
Incomplete applications
If an application does not include all the prescribed information, the regulatory authority may treat the application as invalid. The timeframe for processing an application does not begin until an application is complete and therefore valid.
Notification to parents
An approved provider must notify parents of children enrolled at their services of their intention to apply for voluntary suspension of a provider approval at least 14 calendar days before making the application.
Timeframes for assessing an application
A decision must be made within 30 calendar days of the regulatory authority receiving a complete application.
Calculating time
The National Law sets out how timeframes are calculated at schedule 1, clause 31.
An application cannot begin to be processed unless the application is complete/valid and includes all the required information.
Considering an application
The regulatory authority can only suspend a provider approval after consulting with the regulatory authority of each state or territory where the approved provider operates an education and care service. This includes the regulatory authority which granted the provider approval. Failure to consult other regulatory authorities does not affect the validity of the regulatory authority’s decision.
Determining an application
If the regulatory authority grants an application for voluntary suspension of a provider approval, it may agree on the date the suspension takes effect with the approved provider.
The regulatory authority must give written notice of its decision and, if granted, advise the period of suspension.
After approval has been suspended
The effect of suspension is that all service approvals held by the provider are suspended for the same period, unless the service approval is transferred, or a person is approved to manage or control an education and care service in the event the provider dies or becomes incapacitated.
The suspension remains in force for the period specified in the written notice of decision.
The approved provider may apply to have the suspension revoked before the end of the suspension period. If the regulatory authority grants the application to revoke the suspension, they may agree to a date for the suspension to cease with the approved provider.
1.7 Surrender of provider approval
An approved provider can surrender their provider approval by giving written notice to the regulatory authority. Once surrendered, the person is not taken to be an approved provider and must not operate a service.
Generally, if an approved provider changes its legal status, for example, where a sole trader becomes a body corporate, they will need to apply for a new provider approval.
The notice to the regulatory authority must specify the date the surrender is intended to take effect. This date must be after the notice is given to the regulatory authority and at least 14 calendar days after parents of children enrolled at any services are notified.
Notification to parents
An approved provider must notify parents of children enrolled at any of their services of their intention to surrender their provider approval. Parents must be notified at least 14 calendar days before the date of surrender is to take effect.
After surrender of provider approval
If a provider approval is surrendered, the provider approval and any service approval held by the provider are cancelled on the date specified in the notice.
1.8 Exercise of powers by another regulatory authority
The regulatory authority of another state or territory may exercise all its powers and functions in relation to a provider approval, if the approved provider operates an education and care service in its state or territory.
The regulatory authority may only amend, suspend or cancel a provider approval after consulting with the regulatory authority of each state or territory where the approved provider operates an education and care service. This includes the regulatory authority which granted the provider approval. Failure to consult other regulatory authorities does not affect the validity of the decision made.
Cancellation or suspension of a provider approval in one state or territory applies to all states and territories.
1.9 Offence related to provider approval
A person must not provide an education and care service unless the person is an approved provider of that service.
1.10 Additional information
The following list outlines the organisations responsible for working with children/vulnerable people check screenings in each state and territory other than Tasmania and for working with vulnerable people registration in Tasmania.
State and territory screening units |
||
Australian Capital Territory |
ACT Chief Minister, Treasury and Economic Development Directorate |
|
New South Wales |
New South Wales Office of the Children’s Guardian |
|
Northern Territory |
Northern Territory Government |
|
Queensland |
Queensland Blue Card Services |
|
South Australia |
South Australia Screening Unit of the Department for Communities and Social Inclusion (DCSI) |
|
Tasmania |
Tasmania Department of Justice |
|
Victoria |
Victoria Justice and Regulation |
|
Western Australia |
Western Australia Department of Communities |
2. Service approval
A person must have service approval to operate an education and care service under the National Law and Regulations. Regulatory authorities are responsible for assessing and determining applications for service approval.
This section sets out how applications are made and processed.
2.1 What is an education and care service?
An education and care service is any service providing or intended to provide education and care on a regular basis to children under 13 years of age.
Services that are excluded by the National Law and Regulations and are not in scope of the National Quality Framework are listed below.
Services out of scope of the National Quality Framework |
A school providing full-time education to children, including children in the year before Grade 1, but not including a preschool program delivered in a school or a preschool that is registered as a school (as these are within scope) |
A preschool program delivered in a school if the program is delivered in a class or classes where a full-time education program is also being delivered to school children and the program is delivered to fewer than six children in the school (a composite class) |
A personal arrangement |
A service principally conducted to provide instruction in a particular activity (for example, a language class or ballet class) |
A service providing education and care to patients in a hospital or patients of a medical or therapeutic care service |
Care provided under a child protection law of a participating jurisdiction |
Disability services defined under state or territory law, and early childhood intervention services for children with additional needs |
Education and care in a child’s home |
Except in WA, education and care in a residence, other than as part of a family day care service |
Primarily ad hoc or casual education and care (commonly referred to as occasional care) |
Education and care provided by a hotel or resort to children of short-term guests at the hotel or resort |
Education and care that is provided on an ad hoc basis to children of a guest, visitor or patron where the person who is responsible for the children is readily available at all times |
Education and care where it is primarily provided or shared by parents or family members |
Education and care provided at a secondary school to a child of a student attending the school, where the parent retains responsibility for the child |
Mobile services |
Services that provide education and care for no more than four weeks per calendar year during school holidays |
Transition to school programs provided by a school to orient children to that school |
Services that on 30 June 2018 were funded under the Budget Based Funded program and were not approved under family assistance law |
Services that on 30 June 2018 were funded under the Indigenous Advancement Strategy but were not approved under family assistance law nor regulated under the National Quality Framework |
Playschools licensed in the Australian Capital Territory |
Stand-alone services in Queensland |
Playcentres in South Australia and New South Wales |
Services licensed as Centre-based Class 4 or 5 services under the Child Care Act 2001 in Tasmania |
Licensed limited hours or short-term services in Queensland or Victoria |
Government-funded services under the Children and Community Services Act 2004 of Western Australia. |
Education and care services can include services that educate and care for children under 13 years of age and also provide services for children over 13 years of age.
A transport service
Children can be transported as part of participating in education and care.
Whether this transport is part of the education and care service will depend on the circumstances. For example, where children are transported on an excursion as part of the service, or between a service and a home, school or other site and that transport is provided or arranged by the service, the National Law and Regulations would apply. For further information on specific requirements relating to transportation, see Section 2.14 – Transportation.
Where children leave the premises under transport that is not part of the education and care service, the approved provider must ensure children leave the premises in accordance with regulation 99.
Approved providers should also consider other laws and rules that might apply to transport services in their state or territory, such as road safety, driver licensing or vehicle operator accreditation, safe operation of vehicles including the use of age-appropriate and standardised safety restraints and any Working with Children and Vulnerable People requirements.
2.2 Application for service approval
An approved provider may apply to the regulatory authority for a service approval, provided they operate (or will operate) the service and are responsible for the management of staff members and the nominated supervisor for the service.
A person who has applied for a provider approval may also apply for a service approval. However, the service approval can only be granted if the provider approval is granted.
More than one entity may hold a provider or service approval. Each entity is jointly and severally responsible for complying with the National Law and Regulations. Regulatory authorities will assess the risk associated with joint applicants when determining applications for approvals.
How does an approved provider apply?
An application must be made in writing to the regulatory authority where the service is to be located and must include payment of the fee (see Fees).
The National Regulations specify information that must be included in an application for service approval (see Application checklists – Tables VIII, IX).
Consent to be a nominated supervisor
The approved provider must nominate one or more individuals to be nominated supervisors for the service.
The application for service approval must include written consent from each person nominated acknowledging that they consent to performing the role of nominated supervisor for the service. The only exception is if an approved provider is an individual and nominates themselves to be a nominated supervisor, in which case they do not need to provide written consent. Written consent is required in all other cases.
A service must have at least one nominated supervisor. There is no maximum number of nominated supervisors that may be appointed at one time for a service.
WA See Operational Requirements – Staffing Arrangements for more information on persons in day-to-day charge and nominated supervisors.
Applications for service approval including an associated children’s service
If an approved provider wants to operate a service covered by the National Law on the same premises as a service regulated under a different state or territory law (an associated children’s service), they can apply for service approval for both services under the National Law. For example, a provider may deliver a long day care service (approved education and care service) and an occasional care service (an associated children’s service) from the same premises.
Separate approvals are not needed but the associated children’s service must comply with the relevant state or territory children’s services law. See the Glossary for relevant state and territory children’s services laws.
Applications for service approval including request for approval of a family day care venue
An approved provider may operate a family day care service at a venue only in exceptional circumstances and if approved by the regulatory authority.
An approved provider may apply to have a place approved as a family day care venue by the regulatory authority as part of an application for a new service approval. If the approved provider already holds a service approval, they may apply by seeking an amendment of the service approval (section 54(1A)).
Examples of exceptional circumstances that a regulatory authority may consider in approving a venue include:
- where the proposed venue is located in a rural or remote area, and the location or characteristics of residences are not suited to family day care
- other locations where potential residences may be unsuitable
- for a temporary period (generally up to 12 months), where a residence is unavailable due to essential major repairs or the effects of natural disaster
- where care is provided for a small group of vulnerable or disadvantaged children and a suitable residence is not available. What is considered vulnerable and disadvantaged would depend on the circumstances of each case.
In addition to considering whether exceptional circumstances exist, regulatory authorities must have regard to the suitability of a proposed venue when assessing a new service approval application, and may have regard to suitability when assessing an amendment of a service approval. Approved providers support this process by providing an assessment of the proposed venue in their application. See Assessments of family day care residences and venues.
It is an offence for an approved provider to provide education and care to children from a place that is not an approved family day care venue or residence. This offence attracts a penalty of $22,900 in the case of an individual, or $114,900 in any other case.
Incomplete applications
If an application does not include all the prescribed information, the regulatory authority may treat the application as invalid. The timeframe for processing an application does not begin until an application is complete and therefore valid.
Timeframe for assessing an application
A decision must be made within 90 calendar days of the regulatory authority receiving a complete application. This period may be extended with the applicant’s agreement. There is no limit on how long this may be if the applicant agrees.
If more information is requested, the time taken to provide it is not included in the 90 day period.
If a decision is not made within 90 calendar days (including any extension), it is taken to be refused.
The regulatory authority must give the applicant written notice of its decision, including the reasons, within seven (7) calendar days after it makes the decision.
Calculating time
Considering an application
Conducting enquiries and investigations
When considering an application for service approval, the regulatory authority may:
- ask the applicant to provide more information
- undertake inquiries and investigations, including in relation to the previous licensing, accreditation or registration of the service under a former education and care service, children’s services or education law
- inspect the policies and procedures for the service
- inspect the service premises and enter the service premises at any reasonable time
- administer questions to an applicant and/or persons with management or control by oral or written assessment of their knowledge of the NQF.
Regulatory authorities will generally inspect a proposed service premises as part of the decision-making process wherever possible for an application for a centre-based service approval, and the Principal Office as part of an application for family day care service approval.
Where an inspection is not possible, the regulatory authority can use other methods such as inspection of certified plans or topographical evidence, video or photographic evidence. The regulatory authority may also delegate a visit by a third party, as permitted under section 262 (see Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement).
Matters the regulatory authority must consider
The regulatory authority must consider the below matters when determining an application for service approval.
Matters the regulatory authority must consider for a service approval |
The National Quality Framework |
Except for a family day care residence, the suitability of the service premises and its site and location for operating an education and care service |
The adequacy of the policies and procedures for the service (see Conducting enquiries and investigations) |
Whether the applicant is an approved provider |
Whether the nominated supervisor for the service has given their written consent |
Any suspension of or conditions on the applicant’s provider approval |
For a centre-based service or family day care venue proposed to be located in a multi-storey building with other occupants, whether the premises is located on a storey that provides direct egress to an assembly area to allow the safe evacuation of all children, including any infants and non-ambulatory children. |
When submitting an application for service approval for a centre-based service or family day care venue proposed to be located in a multi-storey building shared with other occupants, applicants should ensure the documentation supplied to the regulatory authority demonstrates there is direct egress to an assembly area.
The regulatory authority may also consider any other matters that are relevant to the application.
Other matters the regulatory authority may consider include:
- whether the applicant’s financial capacity, management ability or any other relevant matters affect their capacity to operate the service
- the applicant’s history of compliance with the National Law, including in relation to any other service they operate.
The regulatory authority may do the following:
- Check the status (that is, approved, suspended, refused or cancelled) of services in other states or territories associated with the approved provider, including the status of services in respect of the Commonwealth Family Assistance Law, for information that may be relevant to their ability to operate a service in accordance with the National Law
- Request proposed budgets for the service, including wages, resources, utility costs, insurances, maintenance of service and professional development. However, it is not the regulatory authority’s responsibility to provide advice to applicants about operational budgets for a service
- Request the approved provider to submit all their policies, or a sample for review. The required policies and procedures are set out in regulation 168. Additional policies and procedures required for family day care services are set out in regulation 169. If there are concerns about the adequacy of the policies, the regulatory authority may seek to review further policies and procedures for the service. Further guidance about preparing policies and procedures can be found on the ACECQA website at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/resources/preparing-nqf-policies-and-procedur…;
For applications that include an associated children’s service, the regulatory authority must consider the criteria for grant of a children’s service approval under the relevant children’s services law, not including the criteria for assessing the applicant’s fitness and propriety.
Requiring more information to make decision on application
The regulatory authority may ask the applicant for any information reasonably required to assess their application. This includes administering questions to an applicant, or a person with management or control by oral or written assessment to assess their knowledge of the NQF.
It can also ask for more information if it is not satisfied the proposed education and care service premises will be suitable because its design makes supervision difficult. In this case, the regulatory authority may ask how they intend to mitigate design issues and ensure adequate supervision at all times.
Conditions on service approval
A condition is a requirement that the person holding the approval must comply with to avoid committing an offence under the National Law.
A service approval is granted subject to conditions that the approved provider must comply with, set out in the table below.
It may also be granted subject to other conditions imposed by the regulatory authority. For example, if there are concerns about the approved provider’s ability to provide an environment safe for infants at the service, such as in a multi-storey building, a condition may be imposed preventing the provider from providing education and care to children under 12 months of age.
A condition applies to the approved provider unless the condition expressly provides otherwise.
A condition of service approval does not apply to an associated children’s service, unless the regulatory authority specifies otherwise. The regulatory authority may apply a condition of service approval solely to an associated children’s service only if it has first consulted with the relevant children’s services regulator.
Conditions may be imposed at the time the service approval is granted, or at a later time (see Amendment of service approval). See Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement – Conditions for more information about conditions on a service approval.
Mandatory maximum number of family day care educators
A condition on each family day care service approval requires there to be a limit on the number of family day care educators that may be engaged by or registered with a family day care service. The regulatory authority must set the maximum number of educators who may be engaged or registered with that service.
The regulatory authority will consider each service on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration:
- current educator numbers
- NQS rating
- provider compliance history
- length of time the provider and the service has been in operation
- support and supervision arrangements for educators.
The regulatory authority may consult with the provider when determining appropriate maximum educator numbers for the service.
Management companies
Occasionally, an approved provider will engage a management company to help them operate their service. Management companies vary in the range of services they offer, from payroll, bookkeeping and short notice staffing solutions to a wide range of day to day management services.
The approved provider retains legal responsibility under the National Law for the service even if it engages a management company. Approved providers cannot delegate or outsource their statutory obligations, or liability, regardless of what contractual arrangement the approved provider has with the management company.
The approved provider may only apply for service approval if it (and not the management company) is or will be the operator of the service, and is, or will be, responsible for the management of the staff members and nominated supervisor.
Persons employed by a management company contracted by the approved provider may be considered a person with management or control of the service if they have authority or responsibility for, or significant influence over planning, directing or controlling the activities or the delivery of the service. This means they must be a fit and proper person.
Requiring more information to make decision on application
Regulatory authorities can seek more information from the approved provider to determine a service approval application (section 51). For example, the regulatory authority may request details of the management company’s name, structure and experience in operating approved education and care services.
Where a management company is or will be involved in running the service, the regulatory authority may make enquiries with the approved provider, by interview or otherwise, to ensure that the approved provider:
- will be responsible for management of staff members and the nominated supervisor
- is fully aware of their responsibilities under the National Law, and understands that they cannot ‘contract out’ those obligations
- has a contingency plan in place should the management company fail to meet expectations or the contract is terminated
- ensure that services provided by the management company which directly impact the day to day operating of the education and care service are provided in a way that is compliant with the National Law, and does not pose a risk to children or the ability of the provider to meet its obligations under the National Law.
The regulatory authority may impose a condition on a service approval (section 51(5)). For example, a condition to require the approved provider to notify the regulatory authority of a change in the management company, or a significant change in the scope of services supplied by the management company, or that the approved provider ensures that officers engaged through the management company are fit and proper persons.
Similarly, where the regulatory authority becomes aware of a management company after granting a service approval, the approval may be amended and a condition imposed where appropriate (section 55(2)).
Determining an application
If the regulatory authority grants a service approval, it must provide a copy to the approved provider including the information below.
The service approval must be displayed so that it is visible from the main entrance of the approved service.
Information on a service approval |
The name of the service |
The location of the service for centre-based services, or the location of the principal office and any approved family day care venues |
Any conditions on the service approval |
The date service approval was granted |
The name of the approved provider |
Except for family day care services, the maximum number of children who can be educated and cared by the service at any one time |
Details of any service waiver or temporary waiver that applies to the service. |
The National Law does not specify how much time the regulatory authority has to give the approved provider a copy of the service approval. This means it must be done as soon as possible after deciding to grant the approval (Schedule 1, clause 31).
If an application for service approval includes an associated children’s service that does not meet state or territory-based licensing requirements for children’s services, the regulatory authority may grant a service approval only for the education and care service. The regulatory authority cannot grant a service approval that is only for an associated children’s service.
Refusing to grant service approval
The regulatory authority cannot grant a service approval if the applicant does not have a provider approval, or if the regulatory authority is satisfied the operation of the service would constitute an unacceptable risk to the safety, health or wellbeing of children.
The regulatory authority may refuse to grant a service approval if it is:
- not satisfied that the grounds for granting approval are met
- not satisfied the applicant can operate the service in a way that meets the National Law and Regulations, including the National Quality Standard
- not satisfied the applicant is entitled to occupy the proposed service premises (for centre-based services)
- not satisfied the applicant is capable of assessing family day care venues or residences or monitoring family day care educators (for family day care)
- not satisfied the provider can maintain the premises or equipment or provide staff as required by the National Law. This may be due to the provider’s financial capacity, management ability or another reason.
Giving notice of the determination
A decision must be made within 90 calendar days. The regulatory authority must give the applicant written notice of its decision, and the supporting reasons, within seven (7) calendar days of making the decision (see Timeframe for assessing an application).
Appeals
A decision to refuse to grant a service approval, or to grant service approval subject to conditions, is a reviewable decision under the National Law (see Reviews).
After an application has been determined
Publication on the register of approved services
Regulatory authorities must keep a register of approved education and care services operating in their jurisdiction including the information set out below.
Information on the register of approved services |
The name of the service |
The name of the approved provider for the service |
Except in the case of a family day care service, the address of each education and care service premises |
In the case of an approved family day care service, the address of the principal office of the service |
The rating levels for each service |
The contact details for the service |
In relation to a centre-based service, the hours of operation of the service |
Any conditions to which the service approval is subject |
In relation to a centre-based service, the approved number of places |
The date the approved provider was granted service approval |
The service approval number |
The provider approval number. |
The regulatory authority and ACECQA may publish the rating levels of the service, the name of the service, the address of the education and care service (except for family day care services) and, in the case of a family day care service, the address of the principal office.
This published information must not identify or lead to the identification of an individual, other than:
- an approved provider
- a person who is being prosecuted for an offence under the National Law.
The address of the principal office of a family day care service should not be published if it is at a private residence. In such cases, the register will not include an address for the service. ACECQA will publish the register of approved services, and regulatory authorities will meet their obligation to publish by linking to the ACECQA website at www.acecqa.gov.au.
Duration and effect of service approval
A service approval authorises the approved provider to operate the education and care service.
A service approval is ongoing unless cancelled or suspended by the regulatory authority, or surrendered or voluntarily suspended by the approved provider. A service approval can also be limited by a condition applied by the regulatory authority.
2.3 Amending service approval on application
An approved provider may apply to the regulatory authority for an amendment of a service approval.
An application must be made in writing and include payment of the fee (see Fees). An application must include:
- the name of the service
- the service approval number
- the name and contact details for the contact person for the application
- the details of the amendment applied for, and sufficient information or documentation to support the application.
If the application includes a request for an approval of a family day care venue, the application must also include:
- the location and street address of the venue
- a statement that the applicant has the right to occupy and use the place as a venue and any document evidencing this (e.g. a lease of the premises)
- an assessment (including any risk assessment) of the place conducted by the approved provider to ensure that the health, safety and wellbeing of children is protected.
The regulatory authority may ask the approved provider for further information reasonably required to assess the application.
Approved providers are not required to submit a service approval amendment to change the location of the family day care principal office. However, they are required to notify the regulatory authority at least 14 days before the change. Regulatory authorities should update the service approval when they receive a notification (see Operational Requirements – Governance and leadership and Applications and Approvals – Amendment of service approval without application).
The approved provider may seek to amend the service approval when requesting approval of a place as a family day care venue. The regulatory authority may approve the application if it considers there are exceptional circumstances and the approved provider has included an assessment of the proposed venue in the application. See Applications for service approval including request for approval of a family day care venue and Assessments of family day care residences and venues.
Incomplete applications
If an application does not include all the prescribed information, the regulatory authority may treat the application as invalid. The timeframe for processing an application does not begin until an application is complete and therefore valid.
Timeframe for assessing an application
A decision must be made within 60 calendar days of the regulatory authority receiving a complete application.
Calculating time
The National Law sets out how timeframes are calculated at schedule 1, clause 31.
An application cannot begin to be processed unless the application is complete/valid and includes all the required information.
Considering the application
The National Law and Regulations do not specify the type or level of information needed to assess an application for amendment of service approval, other than requiring an application to include ‘sufficient information’. ‘Sufficient information’ means enough information for the regulatory authority to make a decision on the application.
Determining the application
Once the regulatory authority has received a complete application, it must decide to:
- amend the provider approval in the way that was applied for; or
- amend the provider approval in another way, with the applicant’s written approval; or
- refuse the amendment of the provider approval.
An amendment may include a change to a condition of the provider approval or introduce a new condition.
Appeals
A decision to refuse to amend a service approval is a reviewable decision under the National Law (see Reviews).
After approval has been amended
If the regulatory authority amends the service approval, it must give a copy to the approved provider.
2.4 Amendment of service approval without application
The regulatory authority may amend a service approval at any time without an application from the approved provider. Amendment of a service approval may include varying a condition or imposing a new condition on a service approval.
Regulatory authorities may amend a service approval to reflect a change to the location of the principal office of a family day care service. See Operational Requirements – Governance and leadership for information about providers’ obligations to notify the regulatory authority.
After approval has been amended
The regulatory authority must give the approved provider written notice of the amendment. Amendment takes effect 14 calendar days after the approved provider is notified, or at the end of another period specified by the regulatory authority.
At the request of a relevant children’s services regulator, the regulatory authority must amend a service approval that relates to an associated children’s service, provided the request accords with the relevant children’s services law.
If the regulatory authority amends the service approval, it must give a copy to the approved provider.
Appeals
A decision to amend a service approval is a reviewable decision under the National Law (see Reviews).
Application for amendment to a service approval for family day care service
An application for an amendment to a service approval for a family day care service that includes a request for approval of a place as a family day care venue must also include:
- whether the venue is proposed to be located within a multi-storey building shared with other occupants
- on which storey(s) the proposed venue is proposed to be located
- if the venue is proposed to be located on more than one storey, the ages of the children on each storey
- the total number of storeys in the multi-storey building.
As part of the regulatory authority’s assessment of an application for an amendment to a family day care service approval, the regulatory authority must consider the assessment (including any risk assessment) of the venue conducted by the approved provider to ensure that the health, safety and wellbeing of children being educated and cared for by the service are protected under regulation 116. As part of this assessment (including any risk assessment) for a residence or venue located in a multi-storey building shared with other occupants, the approved provider must consider for each storey on which the residence or venue is located, whether there is direct egress to an assembly area that allows the safe evacuation of children, including any infants and non-ambulatory children.
2.5 Offences related to service approval
Operating a service without service approval
It is an offence under the National Law for a person to provide an education and care service without a service approval. A family day care educator providing education and care as part of an approved service is not committing an offence under this section.
Advertising a service without service approval
It is an offence for a person to publish (or cause to be published) an advertisement for an education and care service unless the service is approved or an application for service approval has been submitted to the regulatory authority but not yet decided.
A family day care educator can advertise if they make clear they are part of an approved service. Any advertisement should indicate which approved service they are promoting and include contact details for that service.
Activities that are part of a planning process, such as gauging interest in the feasibility of a service, do not constitute advertising a non-approved service.
2.6 Transfer of service approval
An approved provider (the transferring approved provider) may transfer a service approval to another approved provider (the receiving approved provider).
Notification of decision to transfer
The transferring and receiving approved providers must jointly notify the regulatory authority of the transfer at least 60 calendar days before it is intended to take effect and specify the intended transfer date.
The regulatory authority may agree to a shorter notification period if it considers there are exceptional circumstances (see below).
The notice must be in writing, include the required information and payment of the fee (see Application checklists – Table X and Fees).
Regulatory authority consent
A service approval can only be transferred with the regulatory authority’s consent. The regulatory authority is taken to have consented if it is notified of the transfer and, 28 calendar days before the transfer is to take effect, has not advised the approved providers that it intends to intervene.
The regulatory authority may reassess waivers when notified of the transfer of service approval.
Exceptional circumstances
Regulatory authorities may agree ‘exceptional circumstances’ exist to justify a shorter notification period of less than 60 calendar days. In determining if there are ‘exceptional circumstances’, regulatory authorities may:
- consider if the situation is unusual, not typical – that is, one that cannot ordinarily be planned for (for example, where a management committee must be dissolved suddenly, a transferring approved provider has gone into liquidation or receivership, the transferring approved provider wants to disband/dissolve the legal entity, or the approved provider is ill and no longer able to operate the service, and it is in the best interests of the children at the service to ensure continuity by transferring the service to a new approved provider)
- determine the safety, health and wellbeing of children at the service are at risk (for example, continuity of care becomes compromised).
SA NSW TAS WA Where a service in SA, NSW, Tas or WA is transferred under a transitional arrangement, the notification of transfer must include information regarding the requirements that will need to be met by the service.
Where a service is in NSW and has a waiver, the notification must include how the service will fulfil obligations of the waiver, i.e. whether they will be keeping on an early childhood teacher nominee for a staffing waiver.
Delay to transfer date
If, after notifying the regulatory authority of the intention to transfer, the transfer date is to be delayed, the transferring approved provider and receiving approved provider must jointly notify the regulatory authority of the new transfer date. This change will not affect consent to the transfer – either given or taken to have been given – by the regulatory authority before it received notice of the date change.
Requesting an earlier transfer date after notification given
Once the regulatory authority has consented to the transfer, the transferring approved provider and the receiving approved provider may request the transfer take effect on an earlier date than specified in the notification. The regulatory authority may agree to the requested earlier date if satisfied there are exceptional circumstances (see above).
Decision to intervene in transfer of service approval
The regulatory authority may intervene in a transfer if it is concerned about any matter it considers relevant including:
- the receiving approved provider’s capacity to operate the service, considering their financial capacity, fitness and propriety and management ability
- the receiving approved provider’s history of compliance with the National Law and Regulations, including in relation to any other education and care service they operate.
Regulatory authorities may require the receiving approved provider and/or persons with management or control to undergo an oral or written assessment of the person’s knowledge of the NQF.
If the regulatory authority decides to intervene both the transferring and receiving approved provider must be notified in writing at least 28 calendar days before the transfer is intended to take effect. This does not apply in cases where a notification of service transfer is not lodged in accordance with section 59 of the Law. The notice must include the information set out below.
Information that must be included in notification to intervene in transfer of service approval |
The name of the education and care service |
The service approval number |
The transferring approved provider’s name |
The receiving approved provider’s name |
The matters about which the regulatory authority is concerned. |
If the regulatory authority intervenes, a transfer cannot proceed unless the regulatory authority gives written consent.
The regulatory authority may request more information from the transferring or receiving approved providers to inform its decision to consent or refuse to consent to the transfer. The regulatory authority may also make inquiries about the receiving approved provider.
Decision following intervention in transfer
The regulatory authority may impose conditions on its consent to transfer, including specifying the date the transfer will take effect. The service approval must be transferred in accordance with any conditions imposed.
If the regulatory authority intervenes in a transfer of a service approval, it must notify the transferring and receiving approved providers of its decision at least 10 calendar days before the transfer is intended to take effect.
The notice must specify the regulatory authority’s decision according to the options set out below.
Transfer of service approval – notice of outcome |
Consent to the transfer, including the date on which the transfer will take effect and any conditions on the consent to transfer (notice may also include any new conditions placed on the receiving provider’s provider approval or service approval), or |
Refusal to consent to the transfer (service cannot be transferred), including the reasons for refusal, or |
Suspension of consideration of the transfer until more information is received, and that the transfer may not proceed until the regulatory authority gives its written consent, or |
Decision not yet made on the transfer but will decide within 28 calendar days, and that the transfer may not proceed until the regulatory authority gives its written consent. |
A transfer of service approval is void if it is made:
- without the regulatory authority’s consent
- in a way that does not satisfy conditions imposed on the regulatory authority’s consent
- to a person other than the receiving approved provider who notified the regulatory authority of the transfer.
A cancelled service approval cannot be transferred. A service approval that is going to be cancelled may be able to be transferred (see Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement).
Notification to parents
The receiving approved provider must notify parents of children enrolled at the service of the transfer at least seven (7) calendar days before the transfer takes effect.
Notification following transfer of service approval
The transferring and receiving approved providers must notify the regulatory authority in writing within two (2) calendar days after the transfer takes effect, specifying the date of the transfer. Transfer of a service approval includes transfer of any associated children's service included on the service approval.
On receiving notice that the service has been transferred, the regulatory authority must amend the service approval and give the receiving approved provider an updated copy. The amendment to the service approval is taken to have effect on the date of transfer.
Transfer of suspended service approval
The regulatory authority may consent to the transfer of a suspended service approval. In this case, the suspension ceases when the transfer takes effect, unless the regulatory authority has imposed a condition on the transfer stating otherwise.
Application to transfer service approval when provider approval is cancelled
An approved provider can apply to the regulatory authority for consent to transfer a service approval if their provider approval will be cancelled (see Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement).
The application to transfer must be made within 14 calendar days after the date of the decision to cancel the provider approval. In this case, the service approval is suspended until the regulatory authority has determined the application for consent to transfer.
If the regulatory authority consents to the transfer, suspension of the service approval ceases on the date the transfer takes effect, unless conditions of transfer specify a later date.
If the regulatory authority decides not to consent to the transfer, the service approval is cancelled from the date of its decision.
Application to transfer cancelled service approval
An approved provider can apply to the regulatory authority for consent to transfer a service approval that is to be cancelled, unless the cancellation relates only to an associated children’s service.
The application must be made within 14 calendar days after the regulatory authority decides to cancel the service approval.
If the approved provider applies for consent to transfer, the service approval is suspended, rather than cancelled, until the regulatory authority determines the application.
If the regulatory authority consents to the transfer, its decision to cancel the service approval is revoked. The suspension of the service approval ceases when the transfer takes effect, unless the regulatory authority imposes a condition on their consent to transfer, specifying a later date.
If the regulatory authority refuses to consent to the transfer, the service approval is cancelled, effective from the date of its decision.
The National Law does not specify how an approved provider must apply for consent to transfer service approval if their approval will be cancelled. To ensure it has all the necessary information to decide whether to consent to the transfer, the regulatory authority can request an application be made in the same form as an application to transfer service approval in ordinary circumstances (See Notification of decision to transfer).
2.7 Suspension of service approval
The regulatory authority may suspend the service approval for up to 12 months.
A regulatory authority may suspend a service approval on a number of grounds, such as:
- there is a reasonable belief that it would not be in the best interests of the children for the service to continue to operate
- the service has operated at a rating level not meeting the National Quality Standard and
- a service waiver or temporary waiver does not apply to the service in respect of that non-compliance
- there has been no improvement in the rating level
- the approved provider has not complied with a condition of the service approval or the National Law and Regulations
- the approved provider has not complied with a direction, compliance notice or emergency order under the National Law
- the approved provider has not paid the annual fee for the service approval.
Before a regulatory authority takes action to suspend a service approval, it must:
- notify the approved provider and provide reasons for the action (a ‘show cause notice’)
- allow the approved provider to respond in writing to the notification before making its final decision
- advise the approved provider in writing of the final decision.
The regulatory authority may require the approved provider to notify parents of enrolled children of the suspension in writing.
A regulatory authority may also suspend a service approval without prior notification if there is immediate risk to the safety, health or wellbeing of a child or children. If a regulatory authority suspends a service approval without notification, the suspension can be for no longer than six months.
An approved provider may also apply to voluntarily suspend a service approval for up to 12 months (see Transfer of service approval).
2.8 Voluntary suspension of service approval
An approved provider may apply for voluntary suspension of a service approval and put the service approval ‘on hold’ for up to 12 months.
During that time, the person must not operate the service.
An approved provider may apply if, for example, they no longer wish to operate the service but have not negotiated transfer of the service to another approved provider, or if they need to temporarily relocate a service to different premises during refurbishment.
See Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement for information on non-voluntary suspension of a service approval.
How does the approved provider apply?
An application for voluntary suspension must be in writing and include payment of the prescribed fee.
The National Regulations specify information that must be included in an application to suspend service approval (see Application checklists – Table XI).
Incomplete applications
If an application does not include all the prescribed information, the regulatory authority may treat the application as invalid. The timeframe for processing an application does not begin until an application is complete and therefore valid.
Notification to parents
An approved provider must notify parents of children enrolled at their services of their intention to apply for voluntary suspension of service approval at least 14 calendar days before making the application.
Timeframes for assessing an application
A decision must be made within 30 calendar days of the regulatory authority receiving a complete application.
Calculating time
The National Law sets out how timeframes are calculated at schedule 1, clause 31.
An application cannot begin to be processed unless the application is complete/valid and includes all the required information.
Considering the application
The regulatory authority should consider whether the suspension is reasonable in the circumstances.
The regulatory authority can only suspend a service approval of a family day care service after consulting with the regulatory authority of each jurisdiction where the approved provider operates an education and care service. This includes the regulatory authority which granted the service approval. Failure to consult other regulatory authorities does not affect the validity of the decision.
Determining an application
If the regulatory authority grants an application for voluntary suspension of service approval, it may agree to the date the suspension takes effect with the approved provider.
After approval has been suspended
The suspension of the service approval remains in force for the period specified in the written notice of decision. The regulatory authority can lift a period of voluntary suspension at the approved provider’s request.
2.9 Surrender of service approval
The surrender of service approval means giving up service approval. Once surrendered, the person cannot operate the education and care service.
How does the approved provider surrender approval?
An approved provider can surrender their service approval by giving written notice to the regulatory authority.
The notice to the regulatory authority must specify a date on which the surrender is intended to take effect. The date of effect must be after the notice is given to the regulatory authority and at least 14 calendar days after parents of children enrolled at any services are notified.
Notification to parents
An approved provider must notify parents of children enrolled at the service of their intention to surrender the service’s approval. Parents must be notified at least 14 calendar days before the date of surrender is to take effect.
Fees
Visit the ACECQA website at www.acecqa.gov.au for a full list of prescribed fees under the National Regulations.
Application fees
The National Regulations prescribe fees for certain applications to the regulatory authority.
There is no fee to voluntarily suspend a provider approval or service approval, or to amend a provider approval.
Annual fee
An approved provider must pay the prescribed annual fee for each service approval they hold.
Fees must be paid to the relevant regulatory authority on or before 1 July each year.
Late payment fee
The regulatory authority may charge a late payment fee if an annual fee is not paid by 1 July. The late fee is 15 per cent of the relevant annual fee per 30 days (or part thereof) that the payment is overdue.
If the annual fee is not paid, the regulatory authority may consider taking compliance action (see Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement). Failure to pay the annual fee is grounds for suspension of provider approval and service approval (sections 25 and 70).
Repeated instances of non-payment may indicate poor financial management, and the regulatory authority may decide to reassess the provider’s fitness and propriety to provide an education and care service (see Applications and Approvals).
Waiving or varying a fee
The regulatory authority may waive, reduce, defer or refund a fee payable or that has been paid if there are exceptional circumstances.
The regulatory authority may also offer flexible payment options to providers who are unable to pay their fees due to exceptional circumstances.
Decisions to waive or vary a fee should be made on a case-by-case basis, depending on the circumstances. For example, if a service has been affected by a natural disaster that has significantly impacted the provider’s financial position. The regulatory authority may seek documentary evidence to support the provider’s claims of exceptional circumstances.
Indexation
Fees are indexed each year according to published indexation figures, and are available on the ACECQA website at www.acecqa.gov.au before the beginning of each financial year.
GST
Government regulatory fees are exempt from GST.
3. Waivers and other applications
Waivers play an important role in helping providers maintain their level of service to families while dealing with special circumstances or unexpected events.
An approved provider may apply to a regulatory authority for a waiver of one or more of the prescribed National Regulations. Approved providers can apply for a service waiver where an issue is likely to be ongoing, or a temporary waiver, where the issue can be addressed within 12 months.
3.1 Application for service waiver
A service waiver allows an approved education and care service to be taken to comply with requirement/s of the prescribed National Regulations.
Requirements that can be waived by the regulatory authority under the National Regulations, are set out in the table below.
Requirements that may be covered by a service waiver |
|
Reg |
Requirement |
72A |
Location of principal office of family day care service |
Physical environment |
|
104 |
Fencing |
107 |
Indoor space (Centre-based only) |
108 |
Outdoor space (Centre-based only) |
110 |
Ventilation and natural light |
117 |
Glass (Family Day Care only). |
Staffing |
|
120 |
Educators who are under 18 to be supervised (Centre-based only) |
123 |
Educator to child ratios—centre-based services (Centre-based only) |
124 |
Number of children who can be educated and cared for (Family Day Care only) |
126 |
General educator qualifications – centre-based services |
127 |
Family day care educator qualifications (Family Day Care only) |
128 |
Family day care co-ordinator qualifications (Family Day Care only) |
130 |
Requirement for early childhood teacher—centre-based services—fewer than 25 approved places (Centre-based only) |
131 |
Requirement for early childhood teacher—centre-based services—25 or more approved places but fewer than 25 children |
132 |
Requirement for early childhood teacher—centre-based services—25 to 59 children |
133 |
Requirement for early childhood teacher—centre-based services—60 to 80 children |
134 |
Requirement for early childhood teacher—centre-based services—more than 80 children (Centre-based only) |
Division 2 of Part 4.3 |
(Centre-based only)
|
Ch.7 |
Any jurisdiction-specific, transitional or saving provisions that apply in place of the regulations outlined above. |
How does an approved provider apply?
An application for a service waiver must be in writing and include payment of the prescribed fee (see Fees).
An approved provider may apply for a service waiver and a service approval at the same time.
An approved provider can only apply for a waiver of the regulations set out in the above table. The application may be refused and the application fee may be refunded if the application seeks to waive other regulations.
The National Regulations prescribe information that must be included in an application for a service waiver (see Application checklists – Table XIII).
The application must detail any attempts made to comply with the relevant regulation and include the measures being taken, or to be taken, to protect the wellbeing of children at the service.
The National Law allows an approved provider to apply for a service waiver from staffing requirements. However, if the issue may be resolved within 12 months, a temporary waiver may be more appropriate.
Incomplete applications
If an application does not include all the required information, the regulatory authority may treat the application as invalid. The timeframe for processing an application does not begin until an application is complete and therefore valid.
Timeframe for assessing an application
The regulatory authority must notify the applicant of its decision within 60 calendar days after the application is made. The timeframe for determining an application cannot be extended.
If the approved provider applied for a service waiver and a service approval simultaneously, the regulatory authority may notify the applicant of the outcome of both applications at the same time.
Calculating time
The National Law sets out how timeframes are calculated at schedule 1, clause 31.
An application cannot begin to be processed unless the application is complete/valid and includes all the required information.
Considering an application
When considering an application for a service waiver, the regulatory authority may consider the measures being taken or to be taken to protect the wellbeing of children while the proposed waiver is in force, and any other information included in the application.
Assessment of waiver applications
All applications for service or temporary waivers are assessed on a case-by-case basis. A regulatory authority may request more information or may inspect the service premises or office to assist in deciding to grant or refuse a waiver. If more information is requested, the time taken to provide it is not included in the period for determining the application.
If the regulatory authority grants a waiver, it must issue or reissue the service approval specifying the regulation(s) to which the service waiver applies.
In assessing a waiver application a regulatory authority should consider the following non-exhaustive list:
General
- the measures being taken or to be taken to protect the wellbeing of children being educated and cared for by the service while the proposed waiver would be in place
- the benefits to families, children and communities in having the service operate
- the service’s Quality Improvement Plan
- the number and age range of children enrolled at the service
- attempts made by the approved provider to comply with the regulation(s)
- the cost of any adjustments needed for the service to comply with the regulations for which a waiver is being sought
- the compliance history of the approved provider and/or the service
- unusual or unforeseen circumstances, such as natural disasters
- whether the issue is ongoing (i.e. longer than 12 months) and requires a service waiver, rather than a temporary waiver, or circumstances have changed and a temporary waiver is required instead of a service waiver.
Staffing Waivers
- staff details, including rosters and qualifications
- evidence of recruitment e.g. advertising and the outcomes of a recruitment attempt
- evidence of progress towards relevant qualifications
- strategies in place to attract, upskill and retain staff
- what the service is doing to meet the immediate shortfall.
Physical Environment Waivers (including indoor and outdoor spaces)
- access to indoor and outdoor spaces, or facilities e.g. toilets
- building and floor plans by a certified building practitioner
- photos of relevant spaces, e.g. simulated outdoor space
- details of renovations
- impact on programming, educational outcomes and experience of children
- at the discretion of the regulatory authority, an authorised officer may visit the service premises to view the relevant spaces and gather additional information.
Waiver of requirement to have FDC principal office in the same jurisdiction as FDC service approval
- family day care services are in Local Government Areas in adjacent jurisdictions (e.g. Albury/Wodonga)
- strategies in place to ensure educators will be adequately supported and monitored.
Waiver Conditions
A waiver may be granted subject to conditions. For example, a condition on a waiver may limit it to applying for a specific period of time, i.e. one day a week.
A regulatory authority may grant a waiver subject to conditions for a variety of reasons, including where it considers that limiting the scope of the waiver is appropriate to protect the wellbeing of children educated and cared for by the service.
Conditions on a waiver may be removed, added to or varied at any time. For instance, if a provider fails to take measures to protect the wellbeing of children, as set out in the application, a condition may be imposed which would affect the validity of the waiver. The waiver only applies where steps are taken, in accordance with the application, to protect the wellbeing of children at the service.
If a waiver applies to multiple regulations, conditions may be imposed on some or all aspects of the waiver. Conditions on a waiver are recorded on the service approval certificate. These conditions are in addition to any conditions that apply to the service approval itself.
Determining an application
The regulatory authority may decide to grant or refuse an application for a service waiver.
If the regulatory authority receives an application for a service waiver which should have been an application for a temporary waiver, it can be processed as if it was an application for a temporary waiver. The approved provider is not required to resubmit an application (see Application for temporary waiver).
Applications to waive multiple regulations
At the discretion of the regulatory authority, an approved provider may include multiple regulations in a single waiver application. If the regulatory authority receives an application seeking to waive multiple regulations, it may decide to grant a waiver in relation to some regulations but refuse others.
If a waiver applies to multiple regulations, conditions may be imposed on some or all aspects of the waiver.
After a service waiver has been granted
The regulatory authority must give the approved provider a copy of their service approval that lists the regulation to which the waiver applies and any conditions placed on the waiver.
Revoking a service waiver
A service waiver is ongoing and remains in force until revoked. There is no maximum period for which a service waiver can apply.
While a service waiver is ongoing, it is not ‘permanent’, as the regulatory authority may revoke a service waiver at its discretion. If a service waiver is revoked, the waiver ceases to apply:
- 60 calendar days after the regulatory authority notifies the approved provider of their decision, or
- at the end of a period determined by the regulatory authority and agreed by the approved provider.
An approved provider may apply to the regulatory authority to have a service waiver revoked. In this case, the waiver ceases to apply:
- 14 calendar days after the regulatory authority notifies the approved provider that the application for revocation is approved, or
- at the end of a period determined by the regulatory authority and agreed by the approved provider.
If a service waiver is granted and the regulatory authority later becomes aware that the grounds on which it was granted no longer apply, or if a condition placed on the service approval has not been complied with, it may revoke the waiver. The regulatory authority may revoke a service waiver at its discretion including if, for example, the regulatory authority becomes aware of a relevant risk to the safety, health and wellbeing of children.
If the regulatory authority revokes a waiver and the approved provider fails to comply with a requirement of the National Law and Regulations, it may take compliance action.
3.2 Application for temporary waiver
An approved provider may apply to the regulatory authority for a temporary waiver. A temporary waiver means a service is not required to comply with a specified requirement or requirements of the National Regulations for a period of time.
If the regulatory authority becomes aware of an approved education and care service not being able to meet staffing or physical environment requirements, despite attempts to comply, it may inform the approved provider that they may apply for a temporary waiver, if it is satisfied the approved provider has reasonable justification for not being able to comply.
What requirements can be the subject of an application for a temporary waiver?
Requirements that can be temporarily waived by the regulatory authority under the National Regulations are set out in the table below.
Requirements that may be covered by a temporary waiver |
|
Reg |
Requirement |
72A |
Location of principal office of family day care service |
Physical environment |
|
104 |
Fencing |
107 |
Indoor space (Centre-based only) |
108 |
Outdoor space (Centre-based only) |
110 |
Ventilation and natural light |
117 |
Glass (Family Day Care only). |
Staffing |
|
120 |
Educators who are under 18 to be supervised (Centre-based only) |
123 |
Educator to child ratios—centre-based services |
124 |
Number of children who can be educated and cared for (Family Day Care only) |
126 |
General educator qualifications – centre-based services |
127 |
Family day care educator qualifications (Family Day Care only) |
128 |
Family day care co-ordinator qualifications (Family Day Care only) |
130 |
Requirement for early childhood teacher—centre-based services—fewer than 25 approved places (Centre-based services only) |
131 |
Requirement for early childhood teacher—centre-based services—25 or more approved places but fewer than 25 children |
132 |
Requirement for early childhood teacher—centre-based services—25 to 59 children |
133 |
Requirement for early childhood teacher—centre-based services—60 to 80 children |
134 | Requirement for early childhood teacher—centre-based services—more than 80 children |
136 |
First aid qualifications |
Division 2 Part 4.3 |
Additional requirements for centre-based services
|
Ch.7 |
Any jurisdiction-specific, transitional or saving provisions that apply in place of the regulations outlined above. |
How does an approved provider apply?
An application for a temporary waiver must be in writing and include payment of the prescribed fee (see Fees).
An approved provider can only apply for a waiver of the prescribed regulations set out in the above table. If the regulatory authority receives an application for a waiver of a regulation that is not prescribed, the application may be refused and the application fee may be refunded.
The National Regulations prescribe information that must be included in an application for a temporary waiver (see Application checklists – Table XIII).
The National Regulations do not specify the type of evidence that must be included to support a waiver application. Therefore, the regulatory authority has discretion to accept a range of evidence.
Applications and notifications can be submitted to the regulatory authority online using the National Quality Agenda IT System on the ACECQA website at www.acecqa.gov.au.
Incomplete applications
If an application does not include all the prescribed information, the regulatory authority may treat the application as invalid. The timeframe for processing an application does not begin until an application is deemed complete and therefore valid.
Timeframe for assessing an application
The regulatory authority must notify the applicant of their decision within 60 calendar days of receiving a complete application. There is no provision to extend the timeframe for determining an application for a temporary waiver.
Calculating time
The National Law sets out how timeframes are calculated at schedule 1, clause 31.
An application cannot begin to be processed unless the application is complete/valid and includes all the required information.
When calculating the timeframe, the day the application is received is excluded. If the timeframe is expressed in the legislation in terms of a number of days, the last day of that timeframe is also excluded. ‘Day’ means calendar day. For example, a regulatory authority must make a decision on an application for a temporary waiver within 60 days after the application is received (see section 15). If the regulatory authority receives the application on 1 March, the 60-day timeframe commences on 2 March and runs until the end of 1 May. 1 March is excluded from the calculation, and 30 April, being the 60th day, is also excluded.
If the last day of the timeframe falls on a non-business day, the next business day will be the last day. Using the example above, if 1 May is a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday, the regulatory authority’s decision will be due the first working day after 1 May.
If more information is needed, the time period for responding to the regulatory authority request is excluded from the 60-day limit within which the regulatory authority must decide the application.
Considering an application
The regulatory authority must consider whether any special circumstances disclosed in the application reasonably justify the grant of a temporary waiver. When considering an application for a temporary waiver, the regulatory authority may consider the measures being taken or to be taken to protect the wellbeing of children while the proposed waiver is in force, and any other information included in the application.
The regulatory authority may ask for more information or may inspect the service premises or office for the purpose of assessing the application. If more information is requested, the time taken to provide it is not included in the period for determining the application.
Assessment of waiver applications
All applications for service or temporary waivers are assessed on a case-by-case basis with reference to the requirements of the National Law and Regulations. If the regulatory authority grants a waiver, it must issue or reissue the service approval specifying the regulation to which the waiver applies.
In assessing a waiver application a regulatory authority should consider the following non-exhaustive list:
General
- the measures being taken or to be taken to protect the wellbeing of children being educated and cared for by the service while the proposed waiver would be in place
- the benefits to families, children and communities in having the service operate
- the service’s Quality Improvement Plan
- the number and age range of children enrolled at the service
- attempts made by the approved provider to comply with the regulation(s)
- the cost of any adjustments needed for the service to comply with the regulations for which a waiver is being sought
- the compliance history of the approved provider and/or the service
- unusual or unforeseen circumstances, such as natural disasters
- whether the issue is ongoing (i.e. longer than 12 months) and requires a service waiver, rather than a temporary waiver, or circumstances have changed and a temporary waiver is required instead of a service waiver.
Staffing Waivers
- staff details, including rosters and qualifications
- evidence of recruitment e.g. advertising and the outcomes of a recruitment attempt
- evidence of progress towards relevant qualifications
- strategies in place to attract, upskill and retain staff
- what the service is doing to meet the immediate shortfall.
Physical Environment Waivers (including indoor and outdoor spaces)
- access to indoor and outdoor space, or facilities e.g. toilets
- building and floor plans by a certified building practitioner
- photos of relevant spaces e.g. simulated outdoor space
- details of renovations
- impact on programming, educational outcomes and experience of children
At the discretion of the regulatory authority, an authorised officer may visit the service premises to view the relevant spaces and gather additional information.
Determining an application
Granting or refusing a temporary waiver
If granted, the regulatory authority must specify the period for which the temporary waiver will apply, which can be up to 12 months. The regulatory authority must issue or reissue the service approval, specifying the regulation to which the temporary waiver applies, the period of the waiver, and any conditions placed on the waiver.
Conditions on temporary waivers
If a temporary waiver is granted, the regulatory authority may place conditions on the waiver including limiting the use of the waiver. The regulatory authority may also remove, add to or vary any conditions placed on the temporary waiver at any time.
Applications to waive multiple regulations
At the discretion of the regulatory authority, an approved provider may include multiple regulations in a single waiver application. If the regulatory authority receives an application seeking to waive multiple regulations, it may decide to grant a waiver in relation to some regulations but refuse others.
If a waiver applies to multiple regulations, conditions may be imposed on some or all aspects of the waiver.
Revoking a temporary waiver
The regulatory authority may revoke a temporary waiver at its discretion.
An application for a temporary waiver must include details of any attempts made to comply with the regulation and the measures being taken, or to be taken, to protect the wellbeing of children being educated and cared for by the service. The regulatory authority may consider revoking a temporary waiver after it has been granted, if made aware that the grounds on which it was granted no longer apply or that the service approval has not been complied with.
There is no notice period for revoking a temporary waiver.
If the regulatory authority revokes a waiver and the approved provider fails to comply with a requirement of the National Law and Regulations, it may consider whether it is appropriate to take compliance action.
An approved provider may contact the regulatory authority seeking to have a temporary waiver revoked if it is no longer required. The National Law does not prescribe the process for revoking a temporary waiver at a provider’s request.
3.3 Combining a waiver with conditions on service approval
The regulatory authority can impose any conditions it considers appropriate on a service approval and on a waiver.
The regulatory authority may grant a temporary waiver and place conditions on the service approval at the same time.
Conditions may also be placed on the service approval at a later time.
This approach may be suitable where there:
- is a greater risk to children in granting the waiver, such as where the service would not be allowed to operate without meeting certain conditions or taking certain steps
- are concerns about whether the provider will maintain their efforts to meet the requirement and follow through on any agreed actions.
This approach may be preferred if it is important families using the service are aware of the grounds on which the waiver has been issued, as the details of any conditions on a service approval must be displayed at the entrance to the service premises.
After a temporary waiver has been granted
The regulatory authority must give the approved provider a copy of their service approval that lists the regulation to which the waiver applies, the period of the waiver and any conditions placed on the waiver.
Regulatory authorities should take a risk-based approach to monitoring compliance of services with a temporary waiver (see Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement for more information about monitoring activities).
If a service is transferred to a new provider, any waivers that apply will remain in place. However, the regulatory authority might decide to monitor the service after it is transferred, to ensure the grounds on which the waiver was issued still exist.
The National Law does not explicitly give regulatory authorities the power to publish information about waivers. Regulatory authorities may, however, publish information about conditions on service approvals.
Expiry of a temporary waiver
Once the period for which a temporary waiver is granted has passed, the waiver no longer applies and the service must comply with the National Law and Regulations, unless an extension has been granted.
To help ensure families can access current information about the service, the regulatory authority should reissue the service approval once a temporary waiver expires.
Once a temporary waiver expires, the regulatory authority might decide to monitor the service to ensure the requirement is being met (see Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement for more information).
Application to extend a temporary waiver
The approved provider may apply for an extension of a temporary waiver. The regulatory authority cannot extend a temporary waiver without an application from the approved provider. The application must be in writing and include payment of the prescribed fee (see Fees).
The regulatory authority may extend a temporary waiver for up to 12 months. Approved providers may apply for further extensions to a temporary waiver however this will be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
An application for an extension of a temporary waiver must relate to the same regulations and circumstances for which the initial waiver was granted. For instance, a provider might apply for an extension to a temporary waiver if building works take longer than expected, or if an educator needs some more time to complete their approved qualification. If the provider is seeking a waiver of different requirements, they must submit a new application.
When considering an application for extension of a temporary waiver, the regulatory authority will consider the same matters as for an initial application, paying particular attention to the attempts made and/or steps taken by the service to comply with the regulation(s). If the regulatory authority extends the service waiver the service approval will be amended.
Table I |
Information that must be included in an application for provider approval made by an individual (regulation 14) |
(Note: The WA regulatory authority may not require all of the below information for an application for provider approval) |
The applicant’s full name, and any former or other name the applicant may be known by |
The applicant’s residential address and contact details |
The applicant’s date and place of birth |
Proof of the applicant’s identity |
A previous service statement made by the applicant (see Glossary) |
In states excluding NSW or QLD, if the participating jurisdiction has a working with children law:
For applications to the NSW regulatory authority, the applicant’s working with children clearance number or a copy of the applicant’s current working with children card or check. For applications to the Queensland regulatory authority, a copy of the applicant’s current working with children card or check. |
Except for applications to the Queensland regulatory authority:
|
If the applicant lived and worked outside Australia at any time within the previous three years, an overseas criminal history statement made by the applicant |
A disciplinary proceedings statement made by the applicant |
A bankruptcy declaration made by the applicant. |
Table VIII |
Information that must be included in an application for service approval – centre-based service (regulations 24, 25) |
The applicant’s full name and provider approval number (or the applicants contact details if the applicant has applied for a provider approval but the application has not yet been determined) |
The name of the proposed education and care service |
The proposed date on which the education and care service will start operating |
If known, the contact details for the proposed service, including an after-hours telephone number |
The proposed ages of children to be educated and cared for by the service |
The proposed maximum number of children |
The proposed hours and days of operations |
A description of the nature of the service |
The details of any associated children’s service for which approval is sought |
A statement that the applicant has prepared the required policies and procedures as required by regulation 168, see Governance and Leadership |
In relation to the person who will be the nominated supervisor for the service:
|
The location and street address of the proposed service premises. |
* Regulatory authorities may waive this requirement if the approved provider is seeking: – to relocate the education and care service to alternative premises for not more than 12 months, or – to locate the education and care service on a school site.
3.4 Application to use indoor space as outdoor space
The approved provider of a centre-based service or a family day care venue, which educates and cares for children over preschool age, may apply to the regulatory authority to include an area of unencumbered indoor space in calculating the outdoor space at the service.
Considering an application
When making a decision on an application, regulatory authorities will balance the objectives of the legislation to prioritise children’s safety, health and developmental outcomes, with the interests of providers to offer services, and for families to have access to those services.
When reviewing the application, the regulatory authority may consider the:
- number and ages of children and the time spent at the service
- physical elements of the space
- proportion of indoor space to be included in the outdoor space.
Number and ages of children and the time spent at the service
Regulatory authorities may consider the ages of the children at the service and what proportion of children are over preschool age. Indoor space can only be calculated as outdoor space when children over preschool age are being educated and cared for at the service.
The amount of time children spend at the service will also be considered.
Using indoor space in calculating outdoor space is more likely to be appropriate at an outside school hours care service where children are only at the service for a couple of hours each morning and/or afternoon, than at a vacation care service, where children attend from 8am to 5pm each day.
Physical elements of the space
Regulatory authorities may consider how the indoor space can be used. For example, can the indoor space be safely used for activities which would ordinarily be done outside, such as throwing a ball, skipping or running? Regulatory authorities may look at flooring, whether any glass areas are or can be protected, and whether the space is sufficiently lit and ventilated for physical activity.
Where the space is intended to be used for these types of activities, such as gymnasiums or halls, or where they can be safely used for these types of activities, they may be suitable to be included in calculating outdoor space.
Proportion of indoor space to be included in calculating outdoor space
The greater the proportion of indoor space that will be included in calculating outdoor space, the more important it will be for the regulatory authority to be satisfied that the space can be used for activities which would typically be undertaken outside.
If an application is refused
If an application is refused, the approved provider may apply for a service or temporary waiver (see Waivers for more information).
3.5 Application to use a verandah as indoor space
There must be at least 3.25 square metres of unencumbered indoor space for each child being educated and cared for at a centre-based or family day care venue. An approved provider can apply to the regulatory authority to use a verandah as indoor space.
The application may be made with the initial application for service approval, or at a later time.
Considering an application
The regulatory authority will determine applications on a case-by-case basis.
In some climates and in some buildings, verandah space may be a preferable space for children to carry out indoor play activities. Regulatory authorities will balance the health, safety and wellbeing of children with the intent of the legislation to allow suitable verandahs to be included in indoor space calculations.
Services in Queensland
QLD Approval in Queensland is subject to evidence from a building practitioner which demonstrates that the verandah meets the requirements under the relevant building code to be classed as indoor space. A building practitioner may impose requirements on a provider to enable such evidence to be provided (such as requiring the installation of waterproof blinds) and to ensure the space can be considered 'indoors'.
Services in Tasmania
TAS The Early Childhood Centre and School Age Care Facilities Code restricts the Tasmanian regulatory authority from approving verandahs as indoor space, due to the climate.
Services in all other states and territories
All other regulatory authorities may consider the following factors in approving a verandah as indoor space:
- the square metres of usable and unencumbered space
- taking into account the physical elements of the space, such as adequate flooring, roofing and the shape of the space, and whether there are significant periods of the year in which the space will be unsuitable
- taking into account year round weather conditions, community expectations of suitability and measures available to manage climate, such as air conditioning, heating and weatherproofing.
Regulatory authorities may refuse applications if children are at risk of overcrowding because the verandah is unsuitable for indoor play activities for a significant period of time.
Minimum space requirements
There are no minimum space requirements for verandahs to be approved as indoor space.
Building requirements
QLD All regulatory authorities (excluding Queensland) do not need to consider building approvals when assessing applications for verandahs to be included in indoor space calculations.
Light and ventilation
The requirements for natural light, ventilation and temperature that apply to indoor spaces do not apply to verandahs.
Supervision
Adequate supervision is a consideration for any part of the service premises where children are educated and cared for. Supervision does not generally form part of the considerations for assessing whether verandahs are counted towards indoor or outdoor space. Regulatory authorities may consider supervision in cases where the approved provider alters, or intends to alter, the service premises as part of making a verandah suitable as an indoor space (see Operational Requirements – Physical Environment).
Section 3: National Quality Standard and Assessment and Rating
Introduction
The National Quality Standard (NQS) sets a national benchmark for the quality of education and care services and includes seven quality areas that are important to outcomes for children:
QA1 |
Educational program and practice |
QA2 |
Children’s health and safety |
QA3 |
Physical environment |
QA4 |
Staffing arrangements |
QA5 |
Relationships with children |
QA6 |
Collaborative partnerships with families and communities |
QA7 |
Governance and leadership |
Each quality area has two standards, except quality area one, which has three standards. These standards are high-level outcome statements. Under each standard are elements that describe the outcomes that contribute to the standard being achieved. Each standard and element is represented by concepts that support education and care services to navigate and reflect on the NQS.
The quality standards are also underpinned by regulatory standards. The NQS is a schedule within the Education and Care Services National Regulations.
The rating system
Services are assessed and rated by their regulatory authority against the NQS, and given a rating for each of the seven quality areas and an overall rating based on these results.
The process of assessing and rating a service is a combined approach of quality assurance and regulatory compliance.
Quality ratings
The ratings are:
- Excellent rating, awarded by ACECQA
- Exceeding National Quality Standard
- Meeting National Quality Standard
- Working Towards National Quality Standard
- Significant Improvement Required
The quality ratings must be displayed at the service. A ratings certificate, which outlines the overall rating of the service and the current rating levels for each quality area, must also be clearly visible from the main entrance at each FDC residence or venue used to provide education and care to children as part of a family day care service. These ratings are also published on the national registers on the ACECQA website (www.acecqa.gov.au).
Quality improvement
Ongoing self-assessment against the NQS drives continuous improvement and is essential to providing quality outcomes for children.
Each service must have a Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) in place. The QIP identifies areas for improvement and includes a statement of philosophy for the service.
See ACECQA Self-assessment tool for information on conducting self-assessment.
Assessment and rating process
Authorised officers from the regulatory authority will:
- review service information (compliance history, rating and assessment history)
- review a service’s QIP
- visit the service premises to assess and rate the service.
When visiting the service, the authorised officer will collect evidence in the following ways:
Observe – what children, families, educators, co-ordinators and staff members are doing (for example, engaging in caring, friendly and respectful interactions) | |
Discuss – why and how particular practices occur at the service, with the approved provider, nominated supervisor, educators, co-ordinators, family day care educators, assistants or staff members | |
Sight – documentation provided as evidence to support particular practices at the service (for example, records of attendance, enrolment records, policies and procedures, meeting minutes, safety checklists, newsletters, photos, collections of children’s work and documentation of child assessments or evaluations). |
Each service is unique and the ways in which the elements and standards are met will be determined by the service context, including the service environment; the needs, interests, strengths and capabilities of the children attending the service; and the needs of families and the wider community.
National Quality Standard
This chapter describes the National Quality Standard. It includes information about practice, programs, environments and policies at the meeting the National Quality Standard level and questions to prompt reflection on the quality of education and care practice. Examples of what an authorised officer might observe, sight and discuss are outlined for each of the 40 National Quality Standard elements.
Exceeding Themes (see Exceeding NQS Theme Guidance)
This chapter also provides guidance to assist services and authorised officers consider whether a service is Exceeding National Quality Standard.
Exceeding National Quality Standard requires a service to go above and beyond what is expected at the Meeting National Quality Standard level for that Standard.
The higher benchmark for quality that is expected at the Exceeding NQS rating level is described by three Exceeding themes. To determine if a service meets this benchmark, authorised officers ask questions of the evidence they have gathered for each Standard against the Exceeding themes. This chapter describes the Exceeding themes, and provides guidance to assist authorised officers and services. That guidance includes questions to help guide services’ reflections for each of the 15 Quality Standards.
Additionally, questions used by authorised officers in reviewing whether evidence establishes Exceeding practice are provided for each of the three Exceeding Themes. Authorised officers will measure and analyse evidence they have gathered against each of these questions. Authorised officers need to determine an answer of ‘yes’ against all questions in all Exceeding themes for any Standard to be rated Exceeding NQS.
Exceeding NQS Theme Guidance
To achieve a rating of Exceeding NQS for any Standard, the Exceeding themes need to be demonstrated in service practice for that Standard:
- Practice is embedded in service operations
- Practice is informed by critical reflection
- Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
This section describes each of the three Exceeding themes. It includes indicators and questions to assist services and authorised officers consider whether the quality of practice they observe is at the Exceeding NQS level. Further information on what is expected for each Standard is provided throughout the Guide.
The delivery of the NQF is guided by set objectives and guidelines to ensure consistent and effective function.
Exceeding Theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
Overview
At the Exceeding level for any Standard, high quality practice is demonstrated consistently and frequently across the service. It is interwoven through all aspects of the program and is visible, directly or indirectly, in many forms.
At the Exceeding level, educators’ embedded practice is consistent with what is considered high quality practice in relation to the Standard. When practice is ‘embedded’ this means it is usual practice for the Standard. Members of the service team know and understand what is expected in regard to high quality practice for the Standard and consistently work at this level as appropriate for their role and responsibilities within the service.
When high quality practice is embedded, it is reflected across the service’s operations and systems. Observed and discussed practices align with the service’s philosophy, the vision, principles and practices of the approved learning framework/s, and policies and procedures that relate to the Standard.
At the Exceeding level, educators demonstrate a deep understanding of pedagogy. This leads to exemplary practice such as embedding high quality practice throughout service provisions, underpinning all practice with critical reflection and creating contextually appropriate practice for the service community. When educators demonstrate this they are able to link their practice with the National Quality Standards and the reasons behind this approach, in particular how it connects to the service philosophy and broader vision for quality.
Fundamentally, educators understand the themes of exceeding for high quality practice and for the purpose of improving learning and development outcomes for children.
What we aim to achieve with Exceeding Theme 1
When the service team approaches practice with a shared sense of understanding, purpose and agency, this creates a stable, high quality education and care environment that benefits children, families, and the broader service community.
The underlying consistency in intent and approach to practice across the service helps to create a sense of continuity, predictability, and security for each child. A consistent approach to practice does not mean that practice is rigid, unchanging, unreflective, or habit-based. Rather, practice is of high quality, thoughtful and intentional, but is also responsive to the everyday flow of events.
Understanding what is expected and why provides a basis for ongoing discussions about practice, and for ensuring systems are in place to re-think and refine practice, contributing to continuous quality improvement over time.
Assessment indicators for Exceeding Theme 1
Services may demonstrate Exceeding level practice for Standards in a variety of ways that suit their particular operating environment and approach to practice. The following list of indicators is designed to assist services and authorised officers to consider if practice is demonstrated at the Exceeding NQS level.
- Quality practice is demonstrated consistently and frequently across the service at all times.
- Members of the service team, as appropriate to their role and responsibilities within the service:
- understand what is expected in regard to quality practice for the Standard and work consistently at this level
- are able to explain how their practice in relation to the Standard connects to the service’s philosophy and supports the service’s broader vision for quality
- are thoughtful and intentional in their practice for the Standard and respond confidently to the daily flow of events.
- Observed and discussed practice aligns with the service’s philosophy, the vision, principles and practices of the approved learning framework/s and programs in place, and any policies and procedures that underpin practice for the Standard.
Questions used by authorised officers to establish Exceeding NQS practice
Exceeding Theme 1
- Are high quality practices consistent across the service for this Standard?
If so:
- Does the service have processes to ensure consistent high quality practices are in place regardless of the staffing or situation on any given day?
- Do staff/educators have a shared understanding of the service’s approach to high quality practice for the Standard?
- Are you ‘seeing’ usual high quality practice in line with the service philosophy throughout the day? Consider in relation to all aspects of the Standard. Where relevant, this will include during:
- meal times;
- rest times; and
- transition times.
A tailored list of reflective questions for services for each Standard is included in the National Quality Standard.
Exceeding Theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
Overview
Critical reflection means continually thinking about, questioning, analysing and re-evaluating practice to identify where further improvements could be made for educators, children and families. It involves engaging with diverse perspectives and evaluating these in context, leading to pedagogical decisions and actions that are transformative.
Critical reflection informs future practice in ways that demonstrate an understanding of each child’s learning, development and wellbeing, and have implications for equity and social justice (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
At the Exceeding level for any Standard, members of the service team engage in ongoing critical reflection on their practice, as appropriate for their role and responsibilities within the service. Individually and as a team they:
- ask why and how questions of themselves and each other, such as:
- Why do we do that?
- Why do we do it in this way?
- How does this practice contribute to improved outcomes for all children and families?
- Does this practice advantage some children and families and disadvantage others?
- Does this practice include any stereotyping, bias or inequity?
- Does this practice need to change?
- How can we improve this practice?
- consider the theoretical perspectives underpinning their actions and decision-making
- seek different views and opinions and are open to exploring possibilities that they may not have previously considered
- draw on various sources of knowledge and research evidence, and evaluate these sources for their credibility and relevance as well as their ‘fit’ to the context of the service
- consider the rationale behind new ideas and practices to assess if they align with the approved learning framework and the philosophy of the service.
Respect, trust and collegiality are valued so that all members of the service team are able to raise concerns, ask difficult questions, challenge the way things are currently done, and create change in the approach to practice across the service.
The service is responsive to issues, incidents, complaints or feedback. All members of the service team are willing to reconsider their views and re-evaluate their practice, and are mindful of their responsibility to make ethical and well-informed decisions.
What we aim to achieve with Exceeding Theme 2
Engaging in critical reflection supports the service team to make well-informed decisions and plans, to implement and evaluate carefully considered changes to their practice, and to respond with integrity to complex situations and challenges. It also assists them to articulate the reasons for their decisions and practices and to be accountable to children, families, colleagues and communities for their choice of approaches.
Continuously reflecting on practice assists educators to become increasingly thoughtful about their work and motivated to explore new ideas and approaches. Reflective practice supports educators to continue their ongoing professional learning by further developing their knowledge, skills and practices. It also encourages them to stay focussed on continuous quality improvement to improve outcomes for children.
Assessment indicators for Exceeding Theme 2
Services may demonstrate Exceeding level practice for standards in a variety of ways that suit their particular operating environment and approach to practice. The following list of indicators is designed to assist services and authorised officers to consider if practice reflects critical reflection as expected at the Exceeding NQS level.
- Practice is systematically and regularly reflected on and implications for further improvements are purposefully identified and implemented.
- Ongoing learning and quality improvements occur through a systematic cycle of inquiry.
- All members of the service team, as appropriate to their role and responsibilities:
- are aware of the influences on their practice including the key theoretical perspectives identified in the approved learning framework/s and are able to describe how they draw on these in their work
- can identify personal, professional and organisational values in relation to practice
- are comfortable raising concerns and challenging the way things are done, with the expectation that their views will be valued and considered
- are mindful of their responsibility to make ethical and informed decisions
- consider the social justice and equity implications of their practice.
- Decision-making processes draw on diverse perspectives, which are considered in relation to how they align with the service philosophy and the approved learning framework/s used at the service.
- Reasons for decisions that result in changes to practice are clearly understood by all.
- The service is responsive to issues, incidents, complaints or feedback, and these inform ongoing quality improvement.
Questions used by authorised officers to establish Exceeding NQS practice
Exceeding Theme 2
- Is the service reflecting on its practice for this Standard?
If so:
- Is it critical reflection? Critical reflection may:
- involve robust debate;
- reference theorists, or current research or information from outside the service;
- incorporate social justice considerations;
- hypothesise, test and evaluate different approaches to doing things;
- aid the service in responding to complex situations, challenges and expectations;
- involve more than repetition of events that occurred, identifies underlying concepts of significance.
- Can decisions about practice at the service be linked back to critical reflection, and is this evident in observable practice?
- Have staff/educators, relevant to their roles and responsibilities, shown:
- a clear understanding of the reasons behind any changes to their practice or continuation of their current practice?
- the ability to articulate what they are doing and why?
A tailored list of reflective questions for services for each Standard is included in the National Quality Standard.
Exceeding Theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
Overview
At the Exceeding level for any Standard, practice is informed by meaningful engagement with children, families and the community and is suited to the unique context of the service.
Educators learn from, and build on the strengths of children, families, colleagues and the community. They view secure, respectful and reciprocal relationships as crucial to gaining a greater understanding of the priorities and aspirations of children, families and the community. Educators recognise, respect and build on the primary role of families in their own child’s learning and development.
Educators seek deeper insights into the funds of knowledge, capacities, expertise and resources within families, the community and colleagues, including professionals from local support agencies. Educators look for opportunities to build purposeful collaborations and partnerships that utilise and extend these strengths in ways that contribute to achieving the aspirations and priorities of children, families and the service.
Respect for different perspectives is central to the culture of the service. This respect is evident in the way educators seek input, guidance and feedback from all involved in the service, including children. Educators are committed to listening to children’s voices and to trying to understand their perspectives so that they can honour children’s rights to have input into matters that affect them.
Each service has a unique context that is shaped by its families, community and location. Diversity in factors such as language, cultural identity, child rearing practices, values and beliefs contributes to the unique depth and complexity of each service. At the Exceeding level for any Standard, practice is suited to and draws inspiration from this unique context. The service team is culturally responsive and inclusive, modelling and actively promoting respect and valuing of diversity with children, families, colleagues and the community.
Educators demonstrate a genuine commitment to embed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives in all aspects of the curriculum. Being culturally responsive includes respecting and working collaboratively with culturally and linguistically diverse children and families. Cultural responsiveness is evident in everyday practice when educators demonstrate an ongoing commitment to developing their own cultural knowledge in a three-way process with children, families and communities (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Educators take every opportunity to extend children’s understanding of their local context and of their wider world.
What we aim to achieve with Exceeding Theme 3
Services that demonstrate that they are Exceeding the NQS do so in ways that are unique to the children, families and context of their service. Educators consider the children and families who are using the service as well as the particular characteristics, priorities and strengths of the local community when planning, delivering and reflecting on everyday practice. This results in practice that is tailored and responsive to the needs of the children, families and community.
Children learn and develop in the different contexts in which they live. They are more likely to be confident and involved learners when they see connections and experience continuity of learning between their different contexts. Drawing on the strengths of the service context fosters a culture of inclusiveness that enhances families’ sense of belonging, making it more likely that they will sustain their engagement with the service. It also provides opportunities for children to develop a sense of identity, to actively participate and see themselves as agents of change in a tolerant and diverse world.
Assessment indicators for Exceeding Theme 3
Services may demonstrate Exceeding level practice for Standards in a variety of ways that suit their particular operating environment and approach to practice. The following list of indicators is designed to assist services and authorised officers to consider if practice reflects meaningful engagement with families and/or the community and suits the unique context of the service as expected at the Exceeding NQS level.
- Practice reflects, utilises and builds on the unique strengths and priorities of children and families at the service.
- The service actively builds and maintains relationships with families and/or community partners, drawing on a range of communication strategies to support meaningful participation by all.
- Opportunities are regularly provided for family and/or community partners to meaningfully participate in service decisions and solve problems.
- Practice suits the unique environmental context and/or location of the service.
- Practice reflects the cultural and community context of the service.
- The voices of children are valued and taken into account.
- Practice fosters a sense of inclusiveness and belonging for children, families, the service team, and the broader community.
Questions used by authorised officers to establish Exceeding NQS practice
Exceeding Theme 3
- Does the service engage with families and/or the community (local communities, community organisations, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and local support agencies) in relation to this Standard?
If so:
- Is the engagement meaningful? Meaningful engagement may, but does not have to:
- be consistent and ongoing;
- make families and/or the community integral in the decision-making process;
- involve actively seeking and carefully considering and valuing family and community feedback;
- result in shared decision making and problem solving;
- foster a culture of inclusiveness and sense of belonging;
- result in practice that is tailored and responsive to the needs of the children, families and the community.
- Does this meaningful engagement inform and shape practice?
- Does the way in which the service engages with families and/or the community reflect the service and its context?
A tailored list of reflective questions for services for each Standard is included in the National Quality Standard.
Quality Area 1: Educational program and practice
Overview
Quality Area 1 of the National Quality Standard focuses on ensuring that the educational program and practice of educators are child-centred, stimulating and maximise opportunities for enhancing and extending each child’s learning, development and wellbeing. It recognises that a quality program that builds on children’s individual knowledge, strengths, ideas, culture, abilities and interests is likely to have long term benefits for children and for the broader society.
In all settings, the approved provider, nominated supervisor and educational leader are responsible for ensuring that programs for all children are based on an approved learning framework and delivered in accordance with that framework.
The National Quality Standard is linked to two national approved learning frameworks that recognise children learn from birth.
The approved learning frameworks guide:
- the development of programs that promote children and young people’s learning, development and wellbeing
- the pedagogical and critically reflective practices of educators
- a planned and reflective approach to assessment, evaluation and planning for each child
- educators to deepen their understanding and application of culturally responsive practice
- the embedding of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders perspectives in all educators' philosophy and practice (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Cultural responsiveness is a contemporary way to think about culture and enables individuals and organisations to be respectful of everyone’s backgrounds, beliefs, values, customs, knowledges, lifestyles and social behaviours. Being culturally responsive includes a genuine commitment to take action against discrimination in any form, embedding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives in all aspects of the curriculum and working collaboratively with culturally and linguistically diverse children and families. The approved learning frameworks ask educators to move beyond cultural competence to cultural responsiveness. Cultural responsiveness is characterised by respect for cultures that are not your own, ongoing self-reflection, continued learning and a commitment to improving professional practice in this area.
For further guidance on culturally responsive practice, see ACECQA's information sheets on Cultural Responsiveness.
A quality educational program views children and young people as capable and competent learners who have agency and learn best through a play-based program. The learning frameworks also acknowledge the importance of intentionally including opportunities for children to progress towards the learning outcomes (for more information about learning outcomes, see Element 1.1.1.
Play provides a context and a process for learning through which children organise and make sense of their social worlds as they engage actively with people, objects and representations (Early Years Learning Framework).
Play-based learning and intentionality:
- provides opportunities for multimodal play, and for children to learn as they discover, create, improvise, test theories and imagine
- builds a sense of identity and enables expressions of personality and uniqueness
- enhances thinking skills and promotes positive learning dispositions towards learning, such as curiosity and creativity
- strengthens self-regulation, and physical and mental wellbeing
- enables children to make connections between prior experiences and new learning
- assists children to develop relationships and concepts
- supports a sense of wellbeing and promotes a valuing of diversity (Early Years Learning Framework).
In school age care services, the educational program reflects an understanding of middle childhood. The program supports learning through play and leisure when educators act with intentionality to nurture the development of life skills and ensure that the program complements children’s experiences, opportunities and relationships at school, at home and in the community.
In all services, educators draw on their pedagogy, knowledge of individual children, the approved learning frameworks, the National Quality Standard and the underpinning law and regulations when designing contextual programs and considering practices they will use. With their knowledge of the children and families using the service, and the community in which they are located, educators make informed decisions about how to meet the Standards.
Educators take a planned and reflective approach to implementing the educational program by using an assessment and planning cycle and engaging with critical reflection to evaluate and improve the program and practice. Educators share the program with families and ensure families are informed of their child’s learning and development progress.
Services facilitate children and young people’s learning, development and wellbeing through play by providing:
- educators with whom children can form attachments
- educators who use a range of intentional practices and interactions to encourage children’s problem solving and thinking skills
- welcoming and inclusive learning environments that are flexible, responsive and foster all children’s agency and engagement with the natural and built worlds
- indoor and outdoor spaces, materials and resources that address barriers to learning and incorporate reasonable adjustments*
- opportunities for all children to learn on Country and seek information about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander connections and relationships with Country (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care)
- access to a range of resources that children can use in a variety of ways to enrich and extend their play
- uninterrupted and prolonged periods of time to follow their interests.
*A reasonable adjustment is a measure or action taken by approved providers and educators to assist children with disability to participate in education and care on the same basis as children without disability. Under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992, an adjustment is reasonable unless making the adjustment would impose an unjustifiable hardship on the person. In an education and care setting, a reasonable adjustment balances the interests of all parties affected, including the child with disability, the approved provider, educators and other children. See ACECQA resources for more information about making reasonable adjustments, including examples in practice, and other obligations under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992. |
Standards, elements and concepts
Quality Area 1 has three Standards that focus on the educational program, educational practice, and assessment and planning for each child’s learning and development. These Standards are crucial to delivering quality outcomes for children under the National Quality Framework because:
- an educational program that is based on an approved learning framework, is child-centred and maximises learning opportunities strongly contributes to children’s development as competent and engaged learners
- intentionality is a recognised approach to facilitate each child’s learning, development and wellbeing
- responsive teaching values, scaffolds and extends each child’s strengths, skills, knowledge, interests and ideas, and child directed learning promotes children’s agency
- evaluation practices, including critical reflection, informs the assessment and planning cycle and drives improvement in curriculum process and in educational program and practice, resulting in continuous enhancements to children’s learning
- families who are informed about the program and their child’s progress are better equipped to engage with the service and collaboratively make decisions that strengthen their child’s learning, development and wellbeing.
Standard/ Elements | Concept | Descriptor |
---|---|---|
QA1 | Educational program and practice | |
1.1 | Program | The educational program enhances each child’s learning and development. |
1.1.1 | Approved learning framework | Curriculum decision-making contributes to each child’s learning and development outcomes in relation to their identity, connection with community, wellbeing, confidence as learners and effectiveness as communicators. |
1.1.2 | Child-centred | Each child’s current knowledge, strengths, ideas, culture, abilities and interests are the foundation of the program. |
1.1.3 | Program learning opportunities | All aspects of the program, including routines, are organised in ways that maximise opportunities for each child’s learning. |
1.2 | Practice | Educators facilitate and extend each child’s learning and development. |
1.2.1 | Intentional teaching | Educators are deliberate, purposeful, and thoughtful in their decisions and actions. |
1.2.2 | Responsive teaching and scaffolding | Educators respond to children’s ideas and play and extend children’s learning through open-ended questions, interactions and feedback. |
1.2.3 | Child directed learning | Each child's agency is promoted, enabling them to make choices and decisions that influence events and their world. |
1.3 | Assessment and planning | Educators and co-ordinators take a planned and reflective approach to implementing the program for each child. |
1.3.1 | Assessment and planning cycle | Each child’s learning and development is assessed or evaluated as part of an ongoing cycle of observation, analysing learning, documentation, planning, implementation and reflection. |
1.3.2 | Critical reflection | Critical reflection on children’s learning and development, both as individuals and in groups, drives program planning and implementation. |
1.3.3 | Information for families | Families are informed about the program and their child's progress. |
Standard 1.1: Program
How Standard 1.1 contributes to quality education and care
Quality educational programs use an approved learning framework to guide curriculum decision-making and facilitate a shared understanding of children’s learning, development and wellbeing. This enables everyone involved in the service to share their perspectives, understanding of, and support for quality education and care practices.
With support from the approved provider and nominated supervisor, the educational leader collaborates with educators in designing an educational program that enables educators to work with children and families to achieve optimal learning, developmental and wellbeing outcomes for children.
With guidance from the educational leader, educators:
- use an approved learning framework to underpin their everyday practice. The framework guides interactions with children and families and provides the basis for educators’ pedagogical decision-making, including the experiences that are planned for children and the teaching and learning that occurs
- develop the educational program based on their knowledge of each child so that the interactions, experiences, routines and events that each child engages in are relevant to them, respectful of their background and recognise and build on their current strengths, abilities and interests
- evaluate and critically reflect on the effectiveness of their planning and implementation of curriculum for children’s learning
- create culturally safe spaces and provide opportunities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and young people to see themselves, their identities and cultures reflected in their environment
- embed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives in the philosophy of the setting, and their planning and implementation of curriculum (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care)
- ensure that the interactions, experiences, routines and events included in the educational program maximise opportunities for children’s learning
- create inclusive learning environments and make reasonable adjustments to optimise participation and engagement in learning for children
- recognise and respond to barriers that some children face, including attitudinal and practical barriers, to support all children’s inclusion (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 1.1 (for all services)
Educational program
|
|
|
|
Element 1.1.1: Approved learning framework
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 1.1.1Section 51(1)(b) Conditions on service approval (educational and developmental needs of children) Section 168 Offence relating to required programs Regulation 73 Educational program |
What Element 1.1.1 aims to achieve
An approved learning framework guides the development of the curriculum at an education and care service and supports curriculum decision-making as an ongoing cycle of observation, analysing and interpreting learning, documentation, planning, implementation and critical reflection and evaluation. Curriculum decision-making is guided by the vision, principles, practices and learning outcomes of the approved learning framework. This involves educators drawing on their pedagogy and their in-depth knowledge and understanding of each child to intentionally foster and nurture children’s learning, development and wellbeing.
The educational leader and educators use an approved learning framework and the service philosophy to consider the service’s approach to learning, development and wellbeing, and the way in which these guide everyday practice and development of the education program.
Approved learning frameworks
The Early Years Learning Framework and the Framework for School Age Care (and other jurisdiction-approved learning frameworks) include the vision, principles, practices and learning outcomes that guide educational leaders and educators in their curriculum decision-making, and assist them in planning, delivering and evaluating quality programs in early and middle childhood settings.
The Early Years Learning Framework and the Framework for School Age Care (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care) promote five learning outcomes that are designed to capture the integrated and complex learning and development of all children and young people. These are:
- Children and young people have a strong sense of identity
- Children and young people are connected with and contribute to their world
- Children and young people have a strong sense of wellbeing
- Children and young people are confident and involved learners
- Children and young people are effective communicators
The learning outcomes are broad and observable. They acknowledge that children and young people learn in a variety of ways and vary in their strengths, interests, capabilities and pace of learning. The frameworks include examples of how children’s progress towards the outcomes may be evident as well as suggestions for how educators may work to promote these outcomes (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
When using the learning outcomes for planning, educators can modify them to meet the requirements of learners in their learning spaces. Approved providers and educators have inclusion obligations under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 and the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 and make reasonable adjustments for all learning outcomes to ensure learning engagement for all children (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
The Early Years Learning Framework aims to extend and enrich children’s learning from birth through the transition to school. The Educators’ Guide to the Early Years Learning Framework supports the educational leader and educators to deliver programs that enhance learning and developmental outcomes for each child.
The Framework for School Age Care is strongly linked to the Early Years Learning Framework and extends the vision, principles, practices and outcomes to children and young people who attend school age care services. The framework is based on the notion that educators collaborate with children and young people to provide play and leisure opportunities that are meaningful to children, and support their wellbeing, learning and development. The Educators’ Guide to the Framework for School Age Care supports the educational leader and educators to deliver such programs.
Another approved learning framework is the Victorian Early Years Learning and Development Framework.
Curriculum decision-making
Based on knowledge gained from observing children and contributions from their families, educators (together with the educational leader) use the learning framework’s vision, principles, practices and outcomes to plan for each child’s learning, development and wellbeing. Children’s learning is ongoing and each child will progress towards outcomes in different and equally meaningful ways (Early Years Learning Framework).
As children participate in everyday life, they develop knowledge and interests and construct their own identities and understandings of the world (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Educators make curriculum decisions that uphold all children’s rights including the right to have their identities, knowledge, strengths, ideas, culture, abilities and interests acknowledged and valued in the context of their families and communities (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Educators in school age settings recognise that children’s learning, while participating in play and leisure opportunities, complements their learning at home and at school.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 1.1.1 (for all services)
Curriculum decision-making
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
Element 1.1.2: Child-centred
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 1.1.2Section 168 Offence relating to required programs |
What Element 1.1.2 aims to achieve
Educators seek information from families and use a variety of methods to gather information about each child’s knowledge, strengths, ideas, culture, abilities and interests as the foundation of a child-centred educational program. The diversity of family experiences means that children and young people experience ‘belonging, being and becoming’ in many different ways. Children’s unique and diverse experiences, perspectives, expectations, knowledge and skills contribute to their learning (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, their spirituality is connected to Country, and the connection is strong. Providing opportunities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children to see themselves, their identities and cultures reflected in their environment is important for growing a strong identity, and a critical consideration in curriculum decision making (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
As children and young people participate in everyday life, they develop interests and build their identities and understanding of the world (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Learning about these unique aspects of each child and young person and identifying their individual strengths, capabilities and curiosities assists educators to make informed decisions about how to further support their learning development and wellbeing. Educators recognise and are responsive to children’s expertise, cultural traditions and ways of knowing, and the multiple languages spoken by some children, including by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Educators are also aware of and respond to strategies used by children with additional needs to negotiate their everyday lives (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
With support from the educational leader, educators plan and engage with children in a range of experiences where all children are active participants and decision makers. This supports the achievement of child-centred learning outcomes and promotes children’s learning, development and wellbeing.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 1.1.2 (for all services)
Child-centred program
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Element 1.1.3: Program learning opportunities
What Element 1.1.3 aims to achieve
All aspects of the educational program, including interactions, experiences, routines and events (both planned and unplanned) provide opportunities for children and young people's learning and development (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care), and for educators to interact with children and young people in meaningful ways that empower children’s choices and decision-making.
Educators adopt a holistic approach to planning and facilitating learning throughout the program, including during transitions and routines. Educators are alert to learning opportunities to extend children’s learning during planned and unplanned experiences. They support children to follow their interests and to engage in uninterrupted play. Educators create inclusive learning environments and adopt flexible and informed practices, including making reasonable adjustments to optimise access, participation and engagement in learning for all children across all aspects of the program. They ensure transitions support children and young people with additional needs, including children and young people with a disability or those experiencing barriers to learning. Educators actively involve children and young people in preparing for transitions (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Effective routines and transitions are designed to support children and are regarded as equally important as planned or spontaneous play experiences or group times. Routines, such as mealtimes or toileting, provide predictability to assist children to feel safe, secure and confident to explore and learn. Effective transitions promote continuity and predictability and support children’s sense of belonging and wellbeing.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 1.1.3 (for all services)
Program learning opportunities
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 1.1: Program
Program
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 1.1.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 1.1
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Standard 1.2: Practice
How Standard 1.2 contributes to quality education and care
In their pedagogical practice, educators have a professional responsibility to build and nurture relationships with children, young people and families, provide a play-based environment, and facilitate and extend children’s learning, development and wellbeing. Educators are deliberate, purposeful and thoughtful in their decisions and actions. They are intentional in the roles they take in children and young people’s play and leisure, and how they plan the environment and curriculum experiences (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). They value and respond to children’s ideas and curiosities, and extend children’s learning through open-ended questions, meaningful interactions and encouraging feedback. They promote each child’s agency to help them make choices and decisions that influence their world (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Educators’ professional judgments and curriculum decisions are central to their active role in facilitating children’s learning, development and wellbeing. In making professional judgments, educators intentionally utilise their:
- professional knowledge, skills and experience
- contextual knowledge of each child, their families and communities
- understanding that relationships with children and families are critical to creating safe and trusting spaces
- awareness of how their own beliefs and values impact on children’s wellbeing and learning
- awareness of their own biases and how these might impact on inclusive practice
- knowledge and understanding of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives
- knowledge and use of all components in the planning cycle (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Educators also draw on their creativity, intuition and imagination, including engaging in critical reflection, to evaluate and adjust their practice to suit the learners, and the time, place and context of learning (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Intentional and responsive educators actively engage in children’s learning as resourceful and respectful co-learners and collaborators and share decision-making with them. They use everyday interactions with children during play, routines, transitions and ongoing projects to stimulate children’s thinking and to enrich their learning.
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 1.2 (for all services)
Educational practice
|
|
Element 1.2.1: Intentional teaching
What Element 1.2.1 aims to achieve
Intentionality is being deliberate, purposeful and thoughtful in actions and decision making (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
In the middle childhood context, intentionality includes actively promoting children and young people's learning through worthwhile and challenging experiences and interactions that foster high-level critical thinking skills. Intentionality includes engaging with children in meaningful ways that support and extend their thinking and learning (Framework for School Age Care).
Intentional educators teaching utilise their professional knowledge and strategies that reflect contemporary theories and research evidence concerning children and young people's play, leisure and learning, and place-based and relational pedagogies (Framework for School Age Care). Intentional educators are able to explain what they are doing and why they are doing it.
Educators act with intentionality when they:
- recognise that learning occurs in social contexts and that joint attention, interactions, conversations and shared thinking are vitally important for learning
- extend children’s learning using intentional teaching strategies (such as modelling, inquiring and demonstrating, asking questions, speculating, explaining and engaging in sustained shared conversations) to extend children’s knowledge, skills and enjoyment in thinking and learning
- move flexibly in and out of different roles and purposefully draw on different strategies as the context of children’s play changes
- use their professional knowledge to plan and implement worthwhile play-based learning experiences, in indoor and outdoor spaces, using children’s interests, curiosities and funds of knowledge
- facilitate the integration of popular culture, media and digital technologies, which add to children’s multimodal play
- support children to recognise when play is unfair and work with children to build a caring, fair and inclusive learning community
- consider children with diverse inclusion needs and make reasonable adjustments to support their meaningful participation and engagement in the program (Early Years Learning Framework; and the Framework for School Age Care).
Assessment guide for meeting Element 1.2.1 (for all services)
Intentional teaching practice
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Element 1.2.2: Responsive teaching and scaffolding
What Element 1.2.2 aims to achieve
Children and young people's learning is extended when educators make decisions and implement actions that respond to children’s ideas and play to enhance their learning. Responsive teaching and scaffolding involves:
- following up on children’s ideas and interests with open-ended questions and providing positive feedback
- building and sustaining respectful and trusting relationships and interactions with and between children to share decision making and learn together (relational pedagogy)
- respectfully entering children’s play and ongoing projects, stimulating their thinking and enriching their learning and development
- thinking carefully about how children are grouped for play, considering possibilities for peer scaffolding or extending children’s learning through engagement with other children
- encouraging children to further explore their interests and stimulate their thinking
- being aware of, and responding to, strategies used by children with additional needs to negotiate their everyday lives
- using planned and spontaneous ‘teachable moments’ to enhance children’s play and scaffold their learning (adapted from the Early Years Learning Framework; and the Framework for School Age Care).
Responsive teaching is achieved by valuing and building on children’s current and evolving strengths, skills and knowledge to ensure their wellbeing, motivation and engagement in learning. Children learn best when the experiences they have are meaningful to them and are focused on the here and now. Because children constantly learn new skills and gain new insights into their world, educators continuously assess, evaluate and implement responsive teaching strategies.
Educators reflect on the inclusiveness of their practices, including whether these are responsive to individual children and whether they acknowledge all children’s contributions to the group. They view all children as competent and capable, and recognise that equitable means fair, not equal or the same, and some children may need greater access to resources and support to participate in the program. Educators also recognise and respond to barriers that some children face, including attitudinal and practical barriers (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). This updates their knowledge of individual children and helps them to plan new and follow-up experiences that are relevant to each child. All of these experiences are implemented within a social context where peer interactions are encouraged and supported, building a sense of belonging for all children.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 1.2.2 (for all services)
The assessment will be undertaken primarily through observation and discussion with educators.
Responsive teaching and scaffolding practice
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss how educators:
|
Assessors may sight the written program, including examples of:
|
Element 1.2.3: Child directed learning
What Element 1.2.3 aims to achieve
When educators promote child directed learning, they foster children’s agency, build on the key concepts of belonging, being and becoming, and support children to develop a strong sense of identity. Promoting children’s agency recognises that children have a right to make choices and decisions and are capable of initiating and leading their own learning.
When children have opportunities to make choices, to attempt tasks, to make decisions for themselves, and to take on increasing responsibilities, they are able to recognise their influence and significance in the world and develop skills in assessing and taking calculated risks. In doing so, they develop an understanding of themselves as significant, respected and feel a sense of belonging (Early Years Learning Framework). For school age children, identity and confidence are built when they are offered genuine choices, time and opportunity to exercise agency, and act on their own to increase autonomy, resilience and persistence (Framework for School Age Care).
Educators who listen to and respect children’s ideas recognise children’s capabilities and help them develop the sense that their ideas and opinions matter. They support children to explore their world, to ask questions, to express ideas and to learn from their mistakes. Educators support children to develop decision-making skills to make appropriate choices for their own wellbeing and to realise that the choices they make may impact on others. When children are given choices and control, they begin to understand the connection between actions and consequences, and learn to accept challenges and identify and assess what risks are appropriate and how they may be managed.
Educators promote child-directed learning by encouraging children to make decisions about, plan for and help set up and lead their own play experiences or projects.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 1.2.3 (for all services)
The assessment will be undertaken primarily through observation and discussion with educators.
Child-directed learning
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 1.2: Practice
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 1.2.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 1.2
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Standard 1.3: Assessment and planning
How Standard 1.3 contributes to quality education and care
Thoughtful and professional approaches to assessment and planning for each child and young person and the group of children have the potential to enhance their learning, development and wellbeing.
The approved learning framework and the service’s philosophy statement (see Element 7.1.1) guide educators in developing an educational program and practice that supports their beliefs and values about children’s learning.
Educators collect information on each child, analyse what that information tells them about how to support the child’s learning further, document, plan experiences to incorporate into the program, implement the program and then critically reflect on and evaluate what has been learned.
Planning ensures that the educational program and practice responds to children’s strengths, abilities and interests, and scaffolds and extends their learning. It ensures that educators’ practice is intentional and supports children to progress towards the learning outcomes.
Critical reflection encourages educators to engage in analytical and diagnostic thinking to honestly and critically reflect in detail on all aspects of the program, their professional practice, and children’s learning, development and wellbeing.
Educators work in partnership with families in collecting information and planning for each child’s learning and development and seek to keep families informed about the program and their child’s progress. Children’s views and opinions about program planning and evaluation also inform this process.
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 1.3 (for all services)
A planned and reflective approach to program implementation
|
Element 1.3.1: Assessment and planning cycle
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 1.3.1Regulation 74 Documenting of child assessments or evaluations for delivery of educational program State and territory specific provisions NSW – Regulation 274A Programs for children over preschool age NT – Regulation 289A Programs for children over preschool age Qld – Regulation 298A Programs for children over preschool age SA – Regulation 325B Programs for children over preschool age Tas – Regulation 345A Programs for children over preschool age Vic – Regulation 359A Programs for children over preschool age WA – Regulation 373A Programs for children over preschool age (please check the legislation for commencement dates in WA) |
What Element 1.3.1 aims to achieve
Planning and implementation
The assessment and planning cycle is the ongoing process used by educators (with support from the educational leader and in partnership with families and other professionals) to design programs that enhance and extend children and young people’s learning, development and wellbeing. The planning cycle process includes: observation, assessing and analysing learning and engagement, planning, implementation and evaluation, including critical reflection. It is important to note that documentation occurs at every stage of the planning cycle (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Assessment and evaluation are critical parts of the continuous cycle of planning. Assessment refers to the gathering of information about children’s learning, development and wellbeing using a range of strategies. Evaluation refers to educators’ critical reflection on and analysis of this information, and consideration of the effectiveness of their planning and implementation of curriculum for children’s learning, development and wellbeing (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Educators:
- understand the context of the service and how the service’s statement of philosophy guides their decision-making
- collect information in a variety of ways about each child’s knowledge, strengths, learning dispositions, culture, abilities, ideas and interests (gained with children and from their families as well as through observations and other data) that demonstrate the individuality of the child
- analyse each child’s learning and development in relation to the learning outcomes of the approved learning frameworks (see Element 1.1.1), to identify progress which can be shared with families and other professionals or support agencies that work with children and to assist in identifying goal(s) for further learning and development
- plan the program including:
- strategies and experiences for individual children (based on their goals)
- experiences to support achievement of group goals
- experiences to extend emerging strengths, abilities and interests
- experiences that follow up on input from families
- experiences related to relevant community events
- implement the planned experiences, and at the same time identify and utilise ‘teachable moments’ to respond to and support children’s newly emerging strengths, abilities and interests
- critically reflect and evaluate on individual children’s learning and participation and the program as a whole, to inform further planning.
Some states and territories have different documentation requirements for educational programs for children over preschool age. See Regulations 74 (ACT), 274A (NSW), 289A (NT), 298A (Qld), 325B (SA), 345A (Tas), 359A (Vic), and 373A (WA) (please check the legislation for commencement dates in WA).
Observation, analysis, reflection
Reflection occurs at every step of the planning cycle as educators think about their practice and decisions, and children’s engagement with the program.
Educators reflect to:
- ensure that sufficient information has been collected about the child in order to provide an accurate record of their participation in the program, and what they know, can do and understand
- determine the extent to which each child is progressing towards particular learning outcomes and identify any barriers that might be impeding their progress
- identify children who may benefit from additional support to achieve particular learning outcomes and provide that support, or assist families to access specialist help
- plan collaboratively with children and families to support each child’s ongoing learning, development and wellbeing, as well as for the group of children
- evaluate the effectiveness of strategies, schedules, environments, resources, experiences offered and approaches taken to support children’s learning, development and wellbeing
- ensure their pedagogical practices are appropriate for the service context, the philosophy of the service and the children with whom they are working (adapted from the Early Years Learning Framework and the Framework for School Age Care).
Documentation
Documentation of children’s experiences and their responses to the environment makes learning visible to children, educators and families and promotes shared learning and collaboration. It promotes relationships between children, educators and families and demonstrates professionalism. It also enables the assessment and planning cycle to be visible to educators and families.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 1.3.1 (for all services)
Assessment and planning cycle
Assessors may observe educators:
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Evaluations of each child's wellbeing, development and learning continue to be required for school age children educated and cared for by services in the ACT. The evaluation should be proportionate to the amount of time the child attends the service, and the complexity of their individual needs. This is in accordance with established regulatory practice in the ACT.
Assessors may sight:
|
|
Evaluations of each child's wellbeing, development and learning continue to be required for school age children educated and cared for by services in the ACT. The evaluation should be proportionate to the amount of time the child attends the service, and the complexity of their individual needs. This is in accordance with established regulatory practice in the ACT.
Element 1.3.2: Critical reflection
What Element 1.3.2 aims to achieve
Reflective practice is a form of ongoing learning that involves educators intentionally thinking about all aspects of the program, the vision and principles that guide them, the practices they use and the learning outcomes for children. It drives educators’ program planning and implementation to support children’s learning, development and wellbeing. Educational leaders support educators to become increasingly thoughtful about their work, to analyse their actions objectively and motivate them to reflect and explore new ideas and approaches as part of daily practice.
Reflective practice is an ongoing, dynamic process that supports educators to think honestly and critically about all aspects of professional practice, including whether all children and families are included. Reflective practice guides educators to gather information from different perspectives to gain insights that will support, inform and enrich their decision-making about each child’s learning.
Critical reflection is a meaning-making process that involves closely examining all aspects of events and experiences from diverse perspectives, including philosophy, theory, contemporary knowledge, ethics and practice, with a focus on implications for equity, social justice, inclusion and diversity (adapted from the Early Years Learning Framework and the Framework for School Age Care).
Critical reflection takes reflective practice to a deeper level of thinking and evaluation and includes educators, individually and with each other, analysing or diagnosing what happened and why. For example:
- why educators may have responded in the way they did
- how educators felt
- why educators made certain decisions
- what may have influenced educators’ actions
- which theoretical perspectives educators draw on in their decision-making (whether deliberately or subconsciously).
Critical reflection helps educators to build on their knowledge and skills, identifying practice that can be continued as well as what might need to be improved or changed. It also helps educators to identify ways to improve opportunities for children’s participation, learning, development and wellbeing.
Educational leaders support educators to consider questions such as:
- How do we currently examine our practices and decision-making, and identify improvements as well as successes?
- Have we considered which children may be advantaged and whether any child is disadvantaged, excluded or silenced when we work in particular ways?
- How do we use the approved learning framework/s to help us critically reflect?
- How are we creating opportunities for conversations, debates, and collaborative inquiries as a team, ensuring that all voices are heard, considered and responded to with respect?
- What questions do I have about my work? What am I challenged by? What am I curious about? What am I confronted by in relation to my own biases?
- What strategies do I use to demonstrate that I value diversity in all its forms, and promote equitable and genuine participation and inclusion for all children in all aspects of the program? (adapted from the Early Years Learning Framework and the Framework for School Age Care).
Assessment guide for meeting Element 1.3.2 (for all services)
Critical reflection
Assessors may observe educators:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Element 1.3.3: Information for families
| National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 1.3.3Regulation 75 Information about the educational program to be kept available Regulation 76 Information about educational program to be given to parents State and territory specific provisions NSW – Regulation 274A Programs for children over preschool age NT – Regulation 289A Programs for children over preschool age Qld – Regulation 298A Programs for children over preschool age SA – Regulation 325B Programs for children over preschool age Tas – Regulation 345A Programs for children over preschool age Vic – Regulation 359A Programs for children over preschool age WA – Regulation 373A Programs for children over preschool age (please check the legislation for commencement dates in WA) |
What Element 1.3.3 aims to achieve
Quality education and care services engage with families to provide information about the wellbeing, learning and development of their child. Educational leaders support educators to recognise the benefits of quality education and care to both families and the service and to understand that learning outcomes are best achieved when educators work in partnerships with families and acknowledge the diversity of families and their aspirations for their children. Services develop a communication plan in consultation with families to ensure that information for families is accessible, meaningful and useful.
Educators verbally inform families of their child’s participation and progress whenever possible, and share documentation about children’s learning development and wellbeing in ways that are accessible, understandable and meaningful for families. This enables families to understand their child’s strengths, abilities and knowledge from the perspective of the service. Educators also share ‘point-in-time’ summaries about each child’s progress towards the learning outcomes and engage families in the assessment process by actively seeking their input and feedback. Educators draw on families’ knowledge and expertise and encourage them to share in decision-making about their child’s further learning, development and wellbeing.
The educational program is displayed in a way that is accessible, understandable and meaningful for families to read so that they can view what has been planned for their child.
Information is also provided that documents children’s participation and their progress against the approved framework’s learning outcomes, as well as how educators have supported and guided them. Educational leaders support educators to share information safely, sensitively and respectfully, taking into account the child and family’s right to confidentiality.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 1.3.3 (for all services)
Information for families about their child’s progress
Assessors may observe educators:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
In the ACT, documented evaluations of each child's wellbeing, development and learning, proportionate to their attendance and individual needs (see Element 1.3.1) that is shared with families.
Exceeding guidance for Standard 1.3: Assessment and planning
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 1.3.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 1.3
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Quality Area 2: Children’s health and safety
Overview
Quality Area 2 of the National Quality Standard reinforces children’s right to experience quality education and care in an environment that provides for their health and safety. Educators support this when they promote each child’s wellbeing and healthy lifestyle, and support each child’s growing competence, confidence and independence.
Learning about healthy lifestyles, including nutrition, personal hygiene (such as handwashing, dental hygiene and ear care), physical fitness, emotions and social relationships, is integral to children’s wellbeing and self-confidence. Wellbeing and a strong sense of connection, optimism, resilience and engagement enable children and young people to develop a growth mindset and a positive attitude to learning (Framework for School Age Care). With resilience and a growth mindset, each child's ability to take increasing responsibility for their self-help and basic health routines promotes a sense of independence and confidence. Viewing children as active participants and decision-makers opens possibilities for educators to move beyond preconceived expectations about what children can do. This requires educators to respect and work with children and young people’s unique qualities and diverse capabilities (Early Years Learning Framework). As children become more independent, they can take greater responsibility for their own health, hygiene and personal care and they become aware of their own and others’ safety and wellbeing (Framework for School Age Care). This is particularly relevant for school age children attending education and care services.
The approved provider, nominated supervisors, co-ordinators and educators have responsibility for supporting the health, protection, safety and wellbeing of all children. In exercising their responsibilities, they must take reasonable care to protect children from foreseeable risk of harm, injury and infection.
Standards, elements and concepts
Quality Area 2 has two Standards that focus on children’s health and safety. These Standards are crucial to delivering quality outcomes for children under the National Quality Framework because:
- children’s health, comfort and wellbeing strongly impact on their learning, confidence and self-growth
- all children have a right to safety and protection from harm
- adequate supervision and effective management of incidents and emergencies are paramount at all times to support children’s safety and engagement in the educational program.
Standard/Elements | Concept | Descriptor |
---|---|---|
QA2 | Children’s health and safety | |
2.1 | Health | Each child’s health and physical activity is supported and promoted. |
2.1.1 | Wellbeing and comfort | Each child’s wellbeing and comfort is provided for, including appropriate opportunities to meet each child’s need for sleep, rest and relaxation. |
2.1.2 | Health practices and procedures | Effective illness and injury management and hygiene practices are promoted and implemented. |
2.1.3 | Healthy lifestyle | Healthy eating and physical activity are promoted and appropriate for each child. |
2.2 | Safety | Each child is protected. |
2.2.1 | Supervision | At all times, reasonable precautions and adequate supervision ensure children are protected from harm and hazard. |
2.2.2 | Incident and emergency management | Plans to effectively manage incidents and emergencies are developed in consultation with relevant authorities, practised and implemented. |
2.2.3 | Child protection | Management, educators and staff are aware of their roles and responsibilities to identify and respond to every child at risk of abuse or neglect. |
Standard 2.1: Health
How Standard 2.1 contributes to quality education and care
Children’s health and physical wellbeing contributes to their ability to concentrate, cooperate and learn (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Being active, healthy, well rested and free of illness assists children to participate happily and successfully in the learning environment. It is also important that all children are supported to take increasing responsibility for their own health, hygiene and personal care, and become mindful of their own and others’ safety (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Children’s health requirements can change over time as they grow and develop. Working in partnership with children and families, community members, teachers in schools, and where relevant, health care and other professionals, the service should have effective processes to support all aspects of children’s health. This can include:
- being aware of and meeting each child’s physical health, wellbeing and comfort requirements throughout the day
- encouraging physical activity
- supporting all children’s wellbeing by providing opportunities for children’s sleep, rest and relaxation and both passive and active leisure
- implementing effective hygiene practices to control the spread of infectious diseases
- managing injuries and illnesses
- meeting children’s nutritional needs
- teaching children that healthy lifestyles underpin everyday routines and experiences.
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 2.1 (for all services)
Wellbeing and comfort
How do we find out about individual children’s routines, and ensure that all relevant staff members are informed about these? |
|
|
Health practices and procedures
|
|
|
Healthy lifestyle
|
|
Element 2.1.1: Wellbeing and comfort
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 2.1.1Section 51(1)(a) Conditions on service approval (safety, health and wellbeing of children) Section 166 Offence to use inappropriate discipline Regulation 84A Sleep and rest Regulation 84B Sleep and rest policies and procedures Regulation 84C Risk assessment for purposes of sleep and rest policies and procedures |
What Element 2.1.1 aims to achieve
Wellbeing and comfort incorporate both physical and psychological aspects and are central to children’s learning and development. Without a strong sense of wellbeing it is difficult for children to develop a sense of belonging, to trust others and feel confident in being themselves and to participate in experiences that support their personal growth (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Holistic approaches recognise the integration and connectedness of all dimensions of children’s learning, development and wellbeing. When educators take a holistic approach, they pay attention to children’s physical, personal, social, emotional and spiritual wellbeing and cognitive aspects of learning (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Educators who provide a range of active and restful experiences throughout the day support each child’s individual requirements for health, nutrition, sleep, rest and relaxation.
Wellbeing includes physical health, fitness, activity and leisure, nutrition, sleep and rest, feelings of satisfaction and successful social functioning. Children have a right to both passive and active leisure. Children and young people may engage in passive leisure to re-energise or reset, and active leisure including sports, dance and games. Leisure is intrinsically valuable and does not have to be productive (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Children’s individual comfort and wellbeing requirements may vary for daily routines, such as rest, sleep, dressing, and toileting or nappy changing. Educators should recognise and consider how to incorporate each child's requirements into their practice:
- the practices, values and beliefs of the child and the family
- the child’s personal preferences
- the routines and activities that are in place at the child’s home.
Educators should use safe sleep guidelines and their service’s policies and procedures to consult parents and family members about safe sleep practices. Developing a clear and consistent approach which addresses requests from parents and family members is important to ensure respectful approaches that consider children’s individual needs are considered.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 2.1.1 (for all services)
Ensuring children’s wellbeing and comfort
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
|
Element 2.1.2: Health practices and procedures
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 2.1.2Section 51(1)(a) Conditions on service approval (safety, health and wellbeing of children) Regulation 77 Health, hygiene and safe food practices Regulation 85 Incident, injury, trauma and illness policies and procedures Regulation 86 Notification to parents of incident, injury, trauma and illness Regulation 87 Incident, injury, trauma and illness record Regulation 88 Infectious diseases Regulation 89 First aid kits Regulation 90 Medical conditions policy Regulation 91 Medical conditions policy to be provided to parents Regulation 92 Medication record Regulation 93 Administration of medication Regulation 94 Exception to authorisation requirement – anaphylaxis or asthma emergency Regulation 95 Procedure for administration of medication Regulation 96 Self-administration of medication Additional state/territory and local government requirementsIn addition to complying with the National Quality Framework, services must also comply with other relevant national, state/territory and local government requirements. For example, immunisation requirements that prevent enrolment of a child unless approved documentation is provided to indicate the child is fully immunised for their age, or has received an approved exemption from immunisation. For more information, contact your regulatory authority. Some services may require an Immunisation History Statement, which can be obtained from the Australian Immunisation Register. |
What Element 2.1.2 aims to achieve
Illness management and hygiene practices
While it is not possible to prevent the spread of all infections and illnesses, effective illness management practices and maintaining high standards of hygiene significantly reduce the likelihood of children becoming ill. This involves reducing children’s exposure to materials, surfaces and body fluids that may cause infection or illness.
For more information, see the National Health and Medical Research Council’s (NHMRC) publication Staying Healthy: Preventing infectious diseases in early childhood education and care services, 2013.
In helping children to take growing responsibility for their own health and physical wellbeing, educators model and reinforce health and personal hygiene practices with children. Educators also promote continuity of children’s personal health and hygiene by sharing ownership of routines and schedules with children, families and the community.
Injury management
Services need to consider the effectiveness of injury management processes, including risk identification and conducting risk benefit analysis and risk assessments to minimise risk. This involves considering the way educators:
- develop shared notions of ‘risky’ play with children and young people and other educators (Framework for School Age Care)
- are organised to ensure effective supervision
- are proactive, responsive and flexible in using professional judgments to prevent injury from occurring
- support children to take considered, calculated and appropriate risk (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
When developing effective injury management procedures, services also need to consider a range of contingencies if an injury occurs. These include:
- administration of first aid
- contacting emergency services or medical professionals
- contact and communication with families including injury notification forms
- maintaining adequate supervision
- managing the emotional wellbeing of all children and educators
- serious incident and any other notification requirements
- reviewing and evaluating procedures after an incident as part of the quality improvement process.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 2.1.2 (for all services)
Hygiene practices
Assessors may observe:
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Illness and injury management
Assessors may observe:
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
|
Element 2.1.3: Healthy lifestyle
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 2.1.3Section 51(1)(a) Conditions on service approval (safety, health and wellbeing of children) Regulation 78 Food and beverages Regulation 79 Service providing food and beverages Regulation 80 Weekly menu |
What Element 2.1.3 aims to achieve
Healthy eating and physical activity contribute to children’s ability to socialise, concentrate, co-operate and learn. Learning about healthy lifestyles, including nutrition, sleep and rest, personal hygiene, physical fitness, emotions, safe and healthy digital technology use and social relationships, is integral to wellbeing and self-confidence (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Good nutrition is essential to healthy living and enables children to be active participants in play and leisure (Early Years Learning Framework). Education and care settings provide many opportunities for children to experience a range of nutritious food and to learn about healthy food choices from educators and other children.
Physical activity enhances brain development, coordination and social and motor skills and helps children to build confidence in their own abilities, develop their independence, and enjoy being active. The educational leader and educators foster physical and psychological development in children by encouraging physical activity that is challenging, extends thinking and offers opportunities to collaborate and take considered, calculated and appropriate risks. Identity and confidence are built when all children are offered genuine choices, time and opportunity to exercise agency, act on their own to increase autonomy, resilience and persistence (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Instead of trying to eliminate all risk from children’s play, it is important to understand that risky play can be acceptable where the benefit to children’s learning outweighs the risks. Risks can be managed through conducting risk assessments, and weighing the obligation to protect children from foreseeable risk of harm against the benefit of providing children with a stimulating play environment.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 2.1.3 (for all services)
Healthy eating
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
|
|
adequate quantities of food available for children that are consistent with the Australian Dietary Guidelines, as well as sufficient food for children who may request more |
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
where food is brought from home, how the service encourages families to provide food that is consistent with the Australian Government guidelines (Get Up & Grow: Healthy Eating and Physical Activity for Early Childhood, and/or Australian Dietary Guidelines), and is focused on developing respectful relationships and supporting families in their parenting role. |
Assessors may sight:
|
|
Physical activity
Assessors may observe:
|
|
Assessors may discuss how the service:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 2.1: Health
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 2.1.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 2.1
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Standard 2.2: Safety
How Standard 2.2 contributes to quality education and care
Children have a fundamental right to be protected and kept safe when they attend an education and care service. Unsafe settings and situations can negatively impact on children’s physical health and wellbeing, which in turn can negatively affect their experiences, learning and wellbeing in the present and throughout their lives.
Through a widening network of secure relationships, children develop confidence and feel respected and valued. A strong sense of wellbeing promotes children’s confidence and optimism, which maximises their learning and development (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 2.2 (for all services)
Protecting each child
|
|
|
Element 2.2.1: Supervision
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 2.2.1Section 51(1)(a) Conditions on service approval (safety, health and wellbeing of children) Section 165 Offence to inadequately supervise children Section 166 Offence to use inappropriate discipline Section 167 Offence relating to protection of children from harm and hazards Section 170 Offence relating to unauthorised persons on education and care service premises Section 171 Offence relating to direction to exclude inappropriate persons from education and care premises Regulation 82 Tobacco, drug and alcohol free environment Regulation 83 Staff members and family day care educators not to be affected by alcohol or drugs Regulation 84A Sleep and rest Regulation 84B Sleep and rest policies and procedures Regulation 84C Risk assessment for purposes of sleep and rest policies and procedures Regulation 84D Prohibition of bassinets Regulation 99 Children leaving the education and care service premises Regulation 100 Risk assessment must be conducted before excursion Regulation 101 Conduct of risk assessment for excursion Regulation 102 Authorisation for excursions Regulation 102AAB Safe arrival of children policies and procedures Regulation 102AAC Risk assessment for the purposes of safe arrival of children policies and procedures Regulation 102B Transport risk assessment must be conducted before service transports a child Regulation 102C Conduct of risk assessment for transporting of children by the education and care service Regulation 102D Authorisation for service to transport children Regulation 102E Children embarking a means of transport—centre-based service Regulation 102F Children disembarking a means of transport—centre-based service |
What Element 2.2.1 aims to achieve
Supervision is a key aspect of ensuring that children’s safety is protected at all times in the service environment and while on excursion and during transportation provided or arranged by the service.
The educational leader and educators promote children’s learning, wellbeing and development by creating safe physical and social environments that have a positive impact. All children have a right to be protected from potential hazards and dangers posed by products, plants, objects, animals and people in the immediate and wider environment. Educators need to be alert to and aware of the potential for accidents and injury throughout the service, not just within their immediate area.
By fostering children’s capacity to understand and respect the social and natural environment, educators create learning environments that encourage children to explore, problem solve and create and construct in challenging and safe ways.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 2.2.1 (for all services)
Adequate supervision
Assessors may observe:
* Red Nose Australia recognises continuous supervision, in which an educator is in sight and hearing of a sleeping child at all times, represents best practice.
|
|
|
* Portacots should only be used for temporary, short-term arrangements, not for regular use for children enrolled at an education and care service. According to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission guidelines, portacots are designed for brief, temporary use and are more susceptible to wear and tear. Portacots should not be used as permanent sleeping equipment due to potential risk of harm to children. |
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
Reasonable precautions
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
|
|
Element 2.2.2: Incident and emergency management
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 2.2.2Section 51(1)(a) Conditions on service approval (safety, health and wellbeing of children) Regulation 97 Emergency and evacuation procedures Regulation 98 Telephone or other communication equipment |
What Element 2.2.2 aims to achieve
Planning to manage incidents and emergencies assists services to:
- protect children, adults and staff
- maintain children’s wellbeing and a safe environment
- meet the requirements of relevant workplace health and safety legislation.
Having a clear plan for the management and communication of incidents and emergencies assists educators to handle these calmly and effectively, reducing the risk of further harm or damage.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 2.2.2 (for all services)
Incident and emergency management
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Element 2.2.3: Child protection
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 2.2.3Section 51(1)(a) Conditions on service approval (safety, health and wellbeing of children) Section 162A Persons in day-to-day charge, nominated supervisors and family day care co-ordinators to have child protection training Regulation 84 Awareness of child protection law Additional state/territory requirementsIn addition to complying with the National Quality Framework, approved providers, educators and other staff may be required to report on incidents or suspected incidents involving children under other state and territory laws including child protection legislation. Information about notifications can be found throughout the guide. |
What Element 2.2.3 aims to achieve
Management, educators, family day care educator assistants and other staff members must be aware of current child protection policy and procedures, including their legal responsibilities, and be able to act when required to protect any child who is at risk of abuse or neglect.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 2.2.3 (for all services)
Awareness of role and responsibility to protect children
Assessors may observe educators:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 2.2: Safety
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 2.2.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 2.2
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Quality Area 3: Physical environment
Overview
Quality Area 3 of the National Quality Standard focuses on the physical environment. The physical environment is critical to:
- contributing to children’s wellbeing, creativity and developing independence
- providing a diverse range of experiences that promote all children’s learning and development
- keeping all children safe
- creating/organising spaces to reduce the risk of injury
- inclusive practice, including catering for different learning capacities and allowing for reasonable adjustments to be made when required
- building an intercultural space where Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories, cultures and knowledge are shared
- providing opportunities for children to learn on and from Country
- supporting children to appreciate and develop their ability to engage with concepts of social, economic and environmental sustainability as well as social justice, sharing and democracy.
Related National Law and National RegulationsThe National Law and National Regulation provisions that are directly relevant to Quality Area 3 are listed under the corresponding element. Other requirements in the National Law and National Regulations that are relevant to Quality Area 3 are:
Additional state/territory and local government requirementsIn addition to complying with the National Quality Framework, services must also comply with other relevant national, state/territory and local government requirements. These include:
|
Standards, elements and concepts
Quality Area 3 has two Standards that focus on the design of service facilities and the use of the service’s physical environment to support children’s experiences. These Standards are crucial to delivering quality learning outcomes for children under the National Quality Framework because:
- inclusive built and natural environments in indoor and outdoor spaces, when appropriately resourced, promote play-based learning
- well maintained, fit-for-purpose facilities keep children safe and support each child’s access to facilities and participation in activities/experiences
- the physical environment significantly impacts on the quality of children’s experiences and encourages children to become environmentally responsible.
Standard/Elements | Concept | Descriptor |
QA3 | Physical environment | |
3.1 | Design | The design of the facilities is appropriate for the operation of a service. |
3.1.1 | Fit for purpose | Outdoor and indoor spaces, buildings, fixtures and fittings are suitable for their purpose, including supporting the access of every child. |
3.1.2 | Upkeep | Premises, furniture and equipment are safe, clean and well maintained. |
3.2 | Use | The service environment is inclusive, promotes competence and supports exploration and play-based learning. |
3.2.1 | Inclusive environment | Outdoor and indoor spaces are organised and adapted to support every child's participation and to engage every child in quality experiences in both built and natural environments. |
3.2.2 | Resources support play-based learning | Resources, materials and equipment allow for multiple uses, are sufficient in number, and enable every child to engage in play-based learning. |
3.2.3 | Environmentally responsible | The service cares for the environment and supports children to become environmentally responsible. |
Standard 3.1: Design
How Standard 3.1 contributes to quality education and care
The way in which the service environment is designed, equipped and arranged determines how children use space and resources. The environment also impacts on the behaviours and interactions of children and adults.
Indoor environments are characterised by open spaces that provide children with opportunities to be involved in self-chosen and negotiated experiences that can be quiet or active learning situations, solitary play experiences, or routines with small and large groups.
Quality indoor spaces:
- support the emerging interests of every child and enable them to demonstrate their innate creativity and curiosity
- reflect the cultures, interests, abilities and learning styles of every child
- recognise children as active learners and competent decision makers.
Outdoor environments are characterised by both active and quiet zones that comprise a balance of fixed and moveable equipment, open space to engage in physical activities, and spaces that promote investigation and respect for the natural environment.
Outdoor spaces that are dynamic and flexible:
- provide opportunities for unique play and learning
- complement and extend the indoor learning experiences
- offer children opportunities to be active, make mess and noise, and be wholly engaged in play.
To maximise children’s engagement in positive experiences and support the access of every child, services should consider:
- the location of the service and the Traditional Owners and custodians of the land on which the service is located
- the amount of space and how it is arranged and used for different groups and ages of children
- access between indoor and outdoor environments
- the availability of furniture, equipment and resources, and arrangement of rooms
- the availability of play spaces in natural environments that may include plants, trees, edible gardens, open spaces, sand, rocks, mud, water and other elements from nature (Early Years Learning Framework)
- how the placement of buildings, fixtures and fittings supports the access of all children and families
- internal and external noise levels
- visibility and design that supports effective supervision
- the air quality
- ventilation and access to natural light.
Well-designed facilities support children to access different areas, move between indoor and outdoor spaces, explore, experiment, create and express themselves, while allowing others in the space to do the same. When educators, with support from the educational leader, create physical and social learning environments that have a positive impact on children’s learning, they are able to spend valuable time interacting with children. This enriches the lives and identities of children and families.
Providers of centre-based services must notify the regulatory authority of any change in the ages of children being educated or cared for and/or the nature of education and care provided (regulations 175(2)(ab) and (ac)). Doing so allows regulatory authorities to better identify and prevent possible risks within services. When there is a change in the ages of children being educated or cared for and/or the nature of education and care provided, providers need to ensure that each service has the facilities, staffing qualifications and knowledge specific to the current age group of children attending. Failing to do so can place children in settings that are unsuitable for their needs and may pose a risk to their health, safety and wellbeing. For example, introducing a cohort of children aged birth to two requires a range of changes within the service, including nappy change facilities and age-appropriate programming. Similarly, including children over preschool age within a service requires changes to promote the health, safety and wellbeing of these children.
A change to the ages of children being educated or cared for and/or the nature of education and care provided may require:
- a review of and change to resources, furniture and equipment to ensure safety, age-appropriateness and to provide sufficient challenge
- changes to programming/documentation. Different approved frameworks may apply
- a review of staffing because different numbers and qualification requirements may apply
- a change to the physical environment, for example:
- fencing, if a service will begin providing care to children preschool aged or under, and;
- food and bottle preparation areas
- updating policies and procedures, particularly in relation to emergencies and evacuation.
It is important that physical spaces enable appropriate supervision of children in each age group.
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 3.1 (for all services)
Appropriate design and upkeep
|
|
|
Element 3.1.1: Fit for purpose
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 3.1.1Regulation 84A Sleep and rest Regulation 84B Sleep and rest policies and procedures Regulation 84C Risk assessment for purposes of sleep and rest policies and procedures Regulation 84D Prohibition of bassinets Regulation 104 Fencing and security Regulation 106 Laundry and hygiene facilities Regulation 107 Space requirements—indoor space Regulation 108 Space requirements—outdoor space Regulation 109 Toilet and hygiene facilities Regulation 110 Ventilation and natural light Regulation 111 Administrative space Regulation 112 Nappy change facilities Regulation 114 Outdoor space—shade Regulation 115 Premises designed to facilitate supervision Regulation 116 Assessments of family day care residences and approved family day care venues Regulation 116A Inspection of swimming pools, water features and other potential water hazards at family day care residences and approved family day care venues Regulation 116B Inspection report Regulation 116C Compliance with fencing requirements for swimming pools at family day care residences and approved family day care venues Regulation 117 Glass (additional requirement for family day care) Jurisdiction specific provisionsNSW – Regulation 274 Swimming pools Tasmania – Regulation 345 Swimming pool prohibition |
What Element 3.1.1 aims to achieve
To support each child’s access to indoor and outdoor environments, services (including family day care residences and venues) should have sufficient space, equipment and facilities that are fit for purpose and promote children’s learning and development. Well-designed indoor and outdoor spaces:
- are flexible
- are welcoming and accessible
- reflect the diversity within the local and broader communities
- support the health and safety of children, service staff and families
- facilitate convenient and integrated access between indoor and outdoor areas, as well as convenient access to toilet (including nappy-changing, if applicable) and hand-washing facilities
- are environmentally sustainable
- promote an understanding of and respect for the natural environment
- supports the grouping of children in ways that:
- minimise the risk of injury
- minimise conflict between children
- reduce prolonged exposure to excess internal and external noise
- promote children’s learning and development.
Age-appropriate furniture and equipment helps to minimise accidents and support children’s learning, growing independence, confidence and self-esteem.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 3.1.1 (for all services)
A fit for purpose service environment
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
|
|
Element 3.1.2: Upkeep
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 3.1.2Regulation 84D Prohibition of bassinets Regulation 103 Premises, furniture and equipment to be safe, clean and in good repair |
What Element 3.1.2 aims to achieve
In education and care services, the upkeep of buildings, furniture and equipment impact directly on the safety of children and service staff. Every child has the right to be safe.
Upkeep refers to the responsibility of services to implement effective maintenance, cleaning and appropriate safety precautions, which also helps prevent injuries and the spread of infectious diseases.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 3.1.2 (for all services)
Effective upkeep
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
*Portacots should only be used for temporary, short-term arrangements, not for regular use for children enrolled at an education and care service. According to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission guidelines, portacots are designed for brief, temporary use and are more susceptible to wear and tear. Portacots should not be used as permanent sleeping equipment due to potential risk of harm to children. |
|
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 3.1: Design
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 3.1.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 3.1
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Standard 3.2: Use
How Standard 3.2 contributes to quality education and care
A service environment that is inclusive, promotes competence in children and supports exploration and play-based learning creates the context for children to learn and build relationships with others. Welcoming, safe, inclusive, vibrant and flexible environments support children’s exploration, creativity, learning and wellbeing, and are responsive to the individual requirements of each child. A quality physical environment caters for different learning capacities and learning styles, and encourages children and families to contribute ideas, interests and questions (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). It also supports the holistic way that children learn.
Exploration of the natural environment helps to build children’s competence and play-based learning. It also encourages children to develop an appreciation of the natural world, an awareness of the impact of human activity on the environment, and ways in which they can contribute to a sustainable future.
Resources should reflect the breadth of age groups, interests, curiosities, capabilities and cultures of children that are sharing the environment. Resources need to be accessible to children so they can choose and be responsible for their actions (Framework for School Age Care).
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 3.2 (for all services)
Inclusive environment
|
Promoting competence, supporting exploration and play-based learning
|
|
|
Element 3.2.1: Inclusive environment
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 3.2.1Regulation 113 Outdoor space—natural environment |
What Element 3.2.1 aims to achieve
Services provide an inclusive environment when indoor and outdoor spaces are designed to support the diverse needs, interests, preferences and learning styles of all children in the service. Educators can also enhance inclusion by identifying aspects of the environment that can be adapted, or reasonable adjustments made, to support each child’s participation. Indoor and outdoor environments offer significantly different yet complementary experiences and should be given equal focus and attention.
Flexible arrangements of furniture and equipment, together with materials that allow for multiple uses, encourage children to become flexible thinkers and investigators as they engage in play-based learning. A secure and predictable environment with adequate space and appropriate facilities and resources enables children to participate in experiences/activities of their choice, and take increasing responsibility for their own health, hygiene and personal care. This supports children to increase their self-confidence and competence, and provide them with a strong sense of self identify. Environments also support positive relationships when space is arranged for small groups of children to play and talk without undue distraction from children engaged in other activities.
School age care is characterised by opportunities to develop relationships. Some children and young people develop social skills through quiet play, such as talking to friends. Other children and young people socialise through physical play, requiring open spaces to develop physical and social skills, such as team building and leadership. Services should make space available for small and large groups to gather. Indoor and outdoor environments should be organised and adapted to support all aspects of children’s learning and invite conversations between children, educators, families and the broader community. Flexible environments allow for the range of activities that support the learning, development and wellbeing of school age children and young people (Framework for School Age Care).
Assessment guide for meeting Element 3.2.1 (for all services)
Environments that support participation and quality experiences
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
Element 3.2.2: Resources support play-based learning
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 3.2.2Regulation 105 Furniture, materials and equipment |
What Element 3.2.2 aims to achieve
Services should design learning environments with resources that support play-based learning and encourage children and young people to build relationships, explore, solve problems, create and construct (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Educators can provide additional interest, variety and challenge for children by choosing equipment and materials that can be used in multiple ways, and allowing the environment to be regularly and readily rearranged or adjusted. When children are challenged in play and leisure, they explore new possibilities and develop the confidence to take responsibility for their own learning.
Services should provide sufficient resources, materials and equipment for children to engage with and use for play. Resources and materials need to be accessible to children and young people, and reflect the breadth of ages, interests, curiosities and capabilities of children who are sharing the environment (Framework for School Age Care). These resources encourage children’s knowledge of, and connections with, the built and natural environments. Access to digital resources should be accessed appropriately in safe and healthy ways, in line with service policies on the safe use of digital technologies, developed in partnership with children, young people and families (Framework for School Age Care). Environments and resources should emphasise the significance of the history of place and the way Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples act as custodians of the land. Educators should seek to visibly and verbally acknowledge connection of language and culture to Country and Traditional Owners and provide opportunities for all children to learn on and care for Country (Framework for School Age Care).
School age care settings provide children and young people with play and leisure activities in which they experience fun, enjoyment, mastery, success and belonging (Framework for School Age Care). Services should consider how they offer appropriate levels of challenge to encourage school age children to explore, experiment and take appropriate risks (Framework for School Age Care), as they learn to regulate themselves and contribute to the social environment (Framework for School Age Care).
Assessment guide for meeting Element 3.2.2 (for all services)
Sufficient resources to support play-based learning
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Element 3.2.3: Environmentally responsible
What Element 3.2.3 aims to achieve
Education and care settings are places where children learn and young people about self, others and the world, including environmental responsibility and sustainability. Educators provide opportunities for children and young people to learn about the interconnected dimensions of sustainability, including environmental sustainability, which focuses on caring for our natural world and protecting, preserving and improving the environment (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Educators encourage children and young people to develop appreciation of the natural world, understand our impact on the natural world, and the interdependence between people, animals, plants, lands and waters. (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Children and young people develop positive attitudes and values by engaging in sustainable practices, watching adults around them model sustainable practices, and working together with educators to show care and appreciation for the natural environment (Hughes, 2007). Educators support children and young people to take an active role in caring for the environment and to think about ways they can contribute to a sustainable future. This includes recognising that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have looked after Country for the past 60,000 years and providing opportunities for educators and children to learn on and from Country. For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, their spirituality is strongly connected to Country. It is in their relationships and how they communicate with their ancestors, families, kinship systems and communities, and is in their connection to the land (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
This element aligns sustainable operations within the service and children’s learning about environmental responsibility and sustainability. Environments and resources can emphasise accountability and advocacy for a sustainable future and promote children’s understanding about their responsibility to care for the environment on a day to day and long-term basis (Framework for School Age Care). This is particularly relevant for school age care environments as children’s depth of understanding of these concepts develops.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 3.2.3 (for all services)
Supporting environmental responsibility
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 3.2: Use
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 3.2.
Authorised officers determine the rating of each Standard by considering each theme in relation to each Standard descriptor.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 3.2
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
See the ACECQA Educational Leader Resource for information for educational leaders.
Quality Area 4: Staffing arrangements
Overview
Quality Area 4 of the National Quality Standard focuses on the provision of qualified and experienced educators who build secure, respectful and reciprocal relationships with children and young people, create predictable environments and encourage children’s active and meaningful engagement and participation in the learning program. A collaborative and ethical culture where professional standards guide all aspects of practice is critical to a quality service.
Educators’ professional judgements are central to their active role in facilitating children’s learning, development and wellbeing. Educators draw upon different theories, world views, knowledge and perspectives including developmental, socio-cultural and practice theories, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives, to inform their approaches and practices to promote children’s learning, wellbeing and development (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Educators continually seek ways to build their knowledge and skills and develop professional learning communities. Educators evaluate and critically reflect on the effectiveness of their planning and implementation of curriculum for children’s learning, wellbeing and development. Together as a team and with the involvement of children and families, educators establish a robust culture of critical reflection (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
The approved provider, educational leader, nominated supervisor, co-ordinators and educators all play a vital role in establishing effective and ethical practices in the service. A sound philosophy guides decision-making, including decisions about the appropriate arrangement of appropriately qualified educators and staff members at the service. This helps to promote continuity of staff, which contributes to children’s learning, development and wellbeing.
Standards, elements and concepts
Quality Area 4 has two Standards that focus on the organisation and professionalism of educators, staff and management. These Standards are crucial to delivering quality outcomes for children under the National Quality Framework because:
- professional and collaborative relationships between management, educators and staff support continuous improvement, leading to improved learning experiences and outcomes for children
- careful organisation of staff contributes to the continuous support of each child’s learning and development in an effectively supervised environment
- professional standards set quality benchmarks for educators’ practice and relationships.
Standard/Elements | Concept | Descriptor |
---|---|---|
QA4 | Staffing arrangements | |
4.1 | Staffing arrangements | Staffing arrangements enhance children's learning and development. |
4.1.1 | Organisation of educators | The organisation of educators across the service supports children's learning and development. |
4.1.2 | Continuity of staff | Every effort is made for children to experience continuity of educators at the service. |
4.2 | Professionalism | Management, educators and staff are collaborative, respectful and ethical. |
4.2.1 | Professional collaboration | Management, educators and staff work with mutual respect and collaboratively, and challenge and learn from each other, recognising each other’s strengths and skills. |
4.2.2 | Professional standards | Professional standards guide practice, interactions and relationships. |
Standard 4.1: Staffing arrangements
How Standard 4.1 contributes to quality education and care
Having sufficient educators and staff members available at all times when children are present enables the service to deliver quality education and care programs that respond to and promote all children’s learning, development and wellbeing.
Educators are likely to be responsive, purposeful and reflective when staffing arrangements at the service enable them to direct their full attention to their work with children, and when they do not have to attend simultaneously to other tasks. Responsive learning relationships are strengthened as educators and children engage and learn together. The service is encouraged to arrange staff in ways that support positive experiences for all children at the service at all times.
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 4.1 (for all services)
Staffing arrangements
|
|
Element 4.1.1: Organisation of educators
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 4.1.1Section 51(2) Conditions on service approval (FDC Co-ordinators) Section 161 Offence to operate education and care service without nominated supervisor Section 161A Offence for nominated supervisor not to meet prescribed minimum requirements Section 162 Offence to operate education and care service unless responsible person is present Section 163 Offence relating to appointment or engagement of family day care co-ordinators Section 164 Offence relating to assistance to family day care Section 164A Offence relating to the education and care of children by family day care service Section 169 Offence relating to staffing arrangements Section 269 Register of family day care educators, co-ordinators and assistants Regulation 117A Placing a person in day-to-day charge Regulation 117B Minimum requirement for a person in day-to-day charge Regulation 117C Minimum requirement for a nominated supervisor Regulation 118 Educational leader Regulation 119 Family day care educator and family day care educator assistant to be at least 18 years old Regulation 120 Educators who are under 18 to be supervised Regulation 123 Educators to child ratios – centre-based services Regulation 123A Family day care co-ordinator to educator ratios – family day care service Regulation 124 Number of children who can be educated and cared for – family day care educator Regulation 126 Centre-based services – general educator qualifications Regulation 126A Illness or absence of a qualified educator who is required to meet the relevant educator to child ratio Regulation 127 Family day care educator qualifications Regulation 128 Family day care co-ordinator qualifications Regulation 130 Requirement for early childhood teacher – centre-based services – fewer than 25 approved places Regulation 131 Requirement for early childhood teacher – centre-based services – 25 or more approved places but fewer than 25 children Regulation 132 Requirement for early childhood teacher – centre-based services – 25 to 59 children Regulation 133 Requirement for early childhood teacher – centre-based services—60 to 80 children Regulation 134 Requirement for early childhood teacher – centre-based services – more than 80 children Regulation 135 Early childhood teacher illness or absence Regulation 136 First aid qualifications Regulation 143A Minimum requirements for a family day care educator Regulation 143B Ongoing management of family day care educators Regulation 144 Family day care educator assistant Regulation 145 Staff record Regulation 146 Nominated supervisor Regulation 147 Staff members Regulation 148 Educational leader Regulation 149 Volunteers and students Regulation 150 Responsible person Regulation 151 Record of educators working directly with children Regulation 152 Record of access to early childhood teachers Regulation 152A Record of replacement of educator Regulation 152B Record of replacement of early childhood teacher or suitably qualified person Regulation 153 Register of family day care educators, co-ordinators and assistants Regulation 154 Record of staff other than family day care educators, family day care co-ordinators and family day care educator assistants General transitional and saving provisionsRegulation 239 Centre-based service offering a preschool program in a composite class in a school Regulation 239A Centre-based services in remote and very remote areas – attendance of early childhood teachers Regulation 240 Qualifications for educators (centre-based service) Regulation 241 Persons taken to hold an approved early childhood teaching qualification Regulation 242 Persons taken to be early childhood teachers Regulation 243 Persons taken to hold an approved diploma level education and care qualification Regulation 243A Persons taken to hold an approved diploma level education and care qualification for regulation 128 in Queensland Regulation 244 Persons taken to hold an approved certificate III level education and care qualification Jurisdiction specific provisionsACT Regulation 260 Children over preschool age – minimum number of educators and qualifications required Regulation 261 General qualifications for educators – children over preschool age – centre-based services Regulation 262 Required qualifications to be a qualified educator for children over preschool age Regulation 264 General qualification for educators – Centre-based services Regulation 265 Required qualifications to be a qualified educator – unexpected absence of qualified educator Regulation 267 Early childhood teacher – 60 or more children NSW Regulations 271 Educator to child ratios – children aged 36 months or more but less than 6 years Regulation 272 Early childhood teachers – children preschool age or under Regulation 278 Qualifications for primary contact staff members-saving Regulation 388 Educator to child ratios (centre-based services) NT Regulation 290 General qualification requirements for educators – children over preschool age Regulation 294 Early childhood teacher – 60 or more children Qld Regulation 299 General qualification requirements for educators – children over preschool age Regulations 299C Educator to child ratios during rest period Regulations 299D Additional staff members of volunteers Regulations 299E Qualifications for educators Regulations 299F Educator to child ratios when educator, early childhood teacher or suitably qualified person on rest pause Regulations 299G Access to or attendance of early childhood teacher or suitably qualified person on rest pause Regulations 299H Educator to child ratios when educator, early childhood teacher or suitably qualified person absent for 5 minutes or less Regulations 299I Access to or attendance of early childhood teacher or suitably qualified person absent for 5 minutes or less Regulation 300 Educator to child ratios – children aged 15 months to 24 months Regulation 304 Early childhood teacher – 60 or more children SA Regulation 321 General requirements for educators – children over preschool age Regulation 324 Early childhood teachers – preschools Regulation 325 Qualifications for family day care educators Regulation 325A Educator to child ratios during short absence of educators Regulation 332 Early childhood teacher – 60 or more but fewer than 81 children Regulation 333 Early childhood teacher – more than 80 children Regulation 334 Early childhood teachers – Preschools Regulation 335 Qualifications for family day care educators Tas Regulation 342 Educator to child ratio – children preschool age and under who are 36 months of age or over Regulation 342A Educator to child ratios during short absence of educators Regulation 343 Qualifications for educators – preschools Regulation 349 Early childhood teacher in attendance – 60 or more children Vic Regulation 356 Qualifications of educators – children over preschool age Regulation 357 Educator to child ratio – children aged over 24 months but less than 36 months Regulation 363 Early childhood teacher in attendance – 60 or more children Regulation 364 Educational qualifications – centre-based services – saving of existing experience and qualification Regulation 366 Qualifications for family day care educators – saving of existing experience and qualifications WA Regulation 369 Educator to child ratio – children over preschool age Regulation 370 General qualification requirements for educators – children over preschool age Regulation 372 Educator to child ratio – pre-kindergarten programme or kindergarten programme by a school Regulation 373 Early childhood teachers – pre-kindergarten programme or kindergarten programme provided by a school Regulation 379 Educators required to be early childhood teachers |
What Element 4.1.1 aims to achieve
The organisation of educators across a service is a key factor in supporting all children to have opportunities to engage in meaningful learning and interactions with educators with whom they are familiar and comfortable. Carefully planned rosters support educators to be available and responsive to children, and support quality experiences and adequate supervision at all times when children are attending the service.
The National Regulations set educator-to-child ratios to ensure the safety, welfare and wellbeing of children while attending the service, including during excursions and incursions. The presence of adequate numbers of qualified and experienced educators has been consistently linked with quality interactions and positive learning experiences for children. To be counted in the required educator-to-child ratio, educators must be directly involved in the education and care of children and, where required, hold or be actively working towards an approved qualification. In addition to meeting the required educator-to-child ratio, adequate supervision of children must be maintained at all times.
The National Regulations also set qualification requirements for co-ordinators in family day care services. Qualified and experienced co-ordinators train, support and monitor educators in their education and care role with children.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 4.1.1 (for all services)
Organisation of educators
Assessors may observe:
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
|
|
Element 4.1.2: Continuity of staff
What Element 4.1.2 aims to achieve
Continuity of staff on a day-to-day basis and over time assists educators to build secure relationships with children and plays a significant role in promoting their learning and development. Educators who work closely with children each time they attend the service, understand each child’s interests, strengths, capabilities, curiosities and areas where support may be needed. They are able to provide continuity of experiences to extend children’s learning.
A service that values and proactively supports continuity of staff is better placed to attract and retain educators, which in turn benefits children and families. Consistent and committed educators support quality standards and continuity of care for children. It is important for the service to attract appropriately qualified and experienced staff, and retain staff members who can best meet the needs of children and their families.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 4.1.2 (for all services)
Continuity of educators
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 4.1: Staffing arrangements
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 4.1.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 4.1
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Standard 4.2: Professionalism
How Standard 4.2 contributes to quality education and care
Professionalism is demonstrated when management, educators and other staff develop and maintain relationships with each other that are based on the principles of mutual respect, equity and fairness. Team collaboration that is based on understanding the expectations and attitudes of team members, and build on the strength of each other’s knowledge, help nurture constructive professional relationships. These relationships reduce the likelihood of misunderstanding and conflict. For more information see Early Childhood Australia’s Code of Ethics (2016), a resource that guides the behaviour of early childhood professionals.
When adults communicate effectively and respectfully with each other they promote a positive and calm atmosphere at the service, supporting children to feel safe and secure and contributing to the development of positive and reciprocal relationships between children and educators. Unresolved and poorly managed conflict between adults in the service affects morale and impacts on the provision of quality education and care to children.
Collaborative leadership and teamwork are founded on professional and respectful conversations about practice. Educators respect and engage with different ways of thinking and working as a team to critically reflect on practice. When educators communicate effectively and share ideas about practice, children’s learning, development and wellbeing is optimised (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Services support staff to act cohesively and ethically as a team and provide an environment that is conducive to children’s learning, development and wellbeing. This may be reflected in the service’s statement of philosophy (see Element 7.1.1).
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 4.2 (for all services)
|
Element 4.2.1: Professional collaboration
Management, educators and staff work with mutual respect and collaboratively, and challenge and learn from each other, recognising each other’s strengths and skills.
What Element 4.2.1 aims to achieve
Professional collaboration involves working together cooperatively towards common goals. Collaboration is achieved through open communication, information sharing, joint planning and the development of common understandings and objectives (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
In a collaborative environment, all staff are encouraged to respect and value the diverse contributions and viewpoints of their colleagues. Staff also share resources, provide constructive feedback, and work together respectfully and professionally to solve problems. Interactions between management, educators and staff are guided by Early Childhood Australia’s Code of Ethics (2016), the service’s code of conduct and the service philosophy. By collaborating effectively, service staff model successful working relationships for children.
A lively culture of professional inquiry is established when the educational leader, nominated supervisor, co-ordinators and educators are all contributing to continuous improvement at the service. A robust culture of critical reflection occurs when educators as a team, as well as children and young people and families, are involved in the ongoing cycle of review where current practices are discussed, debated and evaluated, and new ideas are generated. Educators can critically reflect on aspects such as program quality, environment design, equity and children’s development and wellbeing (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). By drawing on each person’s diverse perspectives, skills, experiences and background, these discussions enhance the team and provide opportunities for educators to revise their practice and implement strategies for improvement. These discussions also provide educators with an opportunity to develop a shared understanding of how children learn and their role in supporting this, contributing to more effective and responsive programs for children.
Updating and maintaining educators’ knowledge is a joint responsibility of management and educators. This can be achieved through providing a range of professional development strategies that challenge and extend current thinking, including through educational leaders modelling collaborative leadership and teamwork.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 4.2.1 (for all services)
Developing a culture of professional collaboration, recognition and continuous improvement
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Element 4.2.2: Professional standards
What Element 4.2.2 aims to achieve
The approved provider and service staff should use professional standards and ethical principles to guide professional conduct in decision-making and practice. The approved provider must provide clear guidance to all staff about their responsibilities in relation to one another and to the families and children using the service.
The approved provider should also ensure that all staff know and understand the requirements of the National Quality Framework including the National Law, National Regulations, the National Quality Standard, the approved learning frameworks, Early Childhood Australia’s Code of Ethics (2016), as well as the services’ philosophy, policies and procedures.
Educators are required to understand their obligations under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992, particularly in regard to making reasonable adjustments to ensure the meaningful participation of children with disability in the service’s program. The educational leader, coordinators and educators should work together with children and young people and their families to make reasonable adjustments.
It is important that educators and service staff are aware that their attitudes, values and beliefs impact their work. Educators can benefit from working with each other, the educational leader and their supervisor or co-ordinator to identify where biases and assumptions may have informed their values, critically reflect on any biases in an ongoing way, and minimise the impact of bias in their practice and relationships with children, families, colleagues and the local community.
When all educators understand what is guiding their practice and why, educators can make improvements to their practice and enhance outcomes for all children.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 4.2.2 (for all services)
Professional conduct
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 4.2: Professionalism
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 4.2.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 4.2
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Quality Area 5: Relationships with children
Overview
Quality Area 5 of the National Quality Standard focuses on educators developing responsive, warm, trusting and respectful relationships with children and young people that promote their wellbeing, self-esteem, sense of security and belonging. Relationships of this kind encourage children to explore the environment and engage in play and learning.
All children need a sense of connection with others to support the development of their identity and social and emotional competence. From birth, children begin to explore how the social world works. Exploring and learning to socialise appropriately with others, and to manage feelings, behaviours and responsibilities is a complex process. When educational leaders, co-ordinators and educators take a positive, strengths-based approach to guiding children’s behaviour, they ultimately empower children to regulate and manage their behaviour and emotions and develop the skills needed to interact and negotiate positively, respectfully and effectively with others.
Relationships with peers take on increasing importance for older children. Supportive relationships with educators enables older children to develop confidence in their ability to express themselves, work through differences, engage in new experiences and take calculated risks.
Standards, elements and concepts
Quality Area 5 has two Standards that focus on relationships between educators and children, and between children and their peers. These Standards are crucial to delivering quality outcomes for children under the National Quality Framework because supportive and respectful relationships enable children to:
- develop their confidence and a strong and positive sense of identity
- develop effective communication skills and the ability to express themselves effectively
- participate in collaborative learning and develop and build meaningful relationships and friendships.
- regulate and manage their behaviour and emotions and learn to negotiate complex social situations and relationships.
Standard/Elements | Concept | Descriptor |
---|---|---|
5.2.1 | Collaborative learning | Children are supported to collaborate, learn from and help each other. |
5.2.2 | Self-regulation | Each child is supported to regulate their own behaviour, respond appropriately to the behaviour of others and communicate effectively to resolve conflicts. |
QA5 | Relationships with children | |
5.1 | Relationships between educators and children | Respectful and equitable relationships are maintained with each child. |
5.1.1 | Positive educator to child interactions | Responsive and meaningful interactions build trusting relationships which engage and support each child to feel secure, confident and included. |
5.1.2 | Dignity and rights of the child | The dignity and rights of every child are maintained. |
5.2 | Relationships between children | Each child is supported to build and maintain sensitive and responsive relationships. |
Standard 5.1: Relationships between educators and children
How Standard 5.1 contributes to quality education and care
When children and young people experience nurturing and respectful reciprocal relationships with educators, they develop an understanding of themselves as competent, capable and respected. Consistent emotional support contributes to children developing a strong sense of wellbeing and belonging. Relationships are the foundation for the construction of identity, and help shape children’s thinking about who they are, how they belong and what influences them. Relational pedagogy underpins interactions between educators and children and their families and is key to children building a positive sense of self-worth (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Constructive everyday interactions and shared learning opportunities form the basis of equitable, respectful and reciprocal relationships between educators and children. Educators who are actively engaged in children’s learning and share decision-making with them, use their everyday interactions during play, rituals, routines and ongoing projects to stimulate children’s thinking and to enrich and extend their learning, development and wellbeing.
These relationships provide a solid foundation from which to guide and support children as they develop the self-confidence and skills to manage their emotions and behaviour, make decisions and relate positively and effectively to others.
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 5.1 (for all services)
Positive relationships
|
|
Dignity and rights of every child
|
Element 5.1.1: Positive educator to child interactions
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 5.1.1Section 166 Offence to use inappropriate discipline Regulation 155 Interactions with children |
What Element 5.1.1 aims to achieve
Positive interactions between educators and children involve educators viewing each child as capable and competent, and as active participants and decision-makers, with a right to a voice and able to contribute to decisions that affect them. This enables educators to focus their education and care practices on children’s strengths and inclusion in the group environment.
Educators who are responsive to children’s thoughts and feelings are supporting them to develop a strong sense of wellbeing. By interacting positively, respectfully and meaningfully with children, educators help children to feel accepted and to develop trusting relationships and a strong sense of connection and identity. Children who are supported to explore and understand their cultural, social, gender and linguistic identities also experience a sense of belonging that fosters self-esteem. Self-esteem contributes to the development of identity and is critical to children’s capacity to understand their own strengths, capabilities and interests. When children feel safe, secure and supported, they grow in confidence to explore and learn (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Positive and responsive one-on-one interactions, especially with children under three years old, are important to children’s wellbeing and their future development. Secure relationships with educators encourage children under three years to thrive, and provides them with a secure base for exploration and learning. Secure relationships with educators also provide children, when necessary, with a safe haven and source of comfort. As children grow and develop they continue to rely on secure, trusting and respectful relationships with the adults in their lives.
Mutually supportive relationships are important for school age children. Secure, respectful and reciprocal relationships are key to establishing a positive and trusting community in school age care settings, and enable children to develop their independence, leadership and social skills, and a strong sense of identity (Framework for School Age Care).
Assessment guide for meeting Element 5.1.1 (for all services)
Building trusting relationships
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Element 5.1.2: Dignity and rights of the child
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 5.1.2Section 166 Offence to use inappropriate discipline Regulation 155 Interactions with children |
What Element 5.1.2 aims to achieve
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child is a universally agreed set of non-negotiable standards and obligations founded on respect for the dignity and worth of each child and young person, regardless of race, colour, gender, language, religion, opinions, origins, wealth, birth status or ability. The Convention states that all children have the right to an education that lays a foundation for the rest of their lives, maximises their ability, and respects their family, cultural and other identities and languages. The Convention also recognises children’s right to engage in play and, in school age care, recreational activities, their right to rest and leisure, and their right to be active participants in all matters affecting their lives (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
By agreeing to undertake the obligations of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Australia has committed to protecting and ensuring children’s rights. This includes Article 19 of the convention, which states that children have the right to be protected from being hurt and mistreated, physically or mentally.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 5.1.2 (for all services)
Dignity and rights of children
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 5.1: Relationships with children
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 5.1.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 5.1
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Standard 5.2: Relationships between children
How Standard 5.2 contributes to quality education and care
When educators create environments in which children experience mutually enjoyable, caring and respectful relationships with people and the environment, children and young people respond accordingly (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Positive relationships provide children with the confidence and agency to explore and learn about their world. As their relationships become more complex and far-reaching over time, children’s interactions with others also help them to extend their knowledge, thinking and ability to apply what they already know in new and unfamiliar contexts. Developing effective relationships with others is a key part of children’s social development and these relationships also provide a base for children’s learning.
An important aspect of children’s ‘belonging, being and becoming’ involves them learning how their behaviours and actions affect themselves and others. By learning how to make sensible choices about their behaviour, children develop the skills to regulate their emotions and actions independently and understand the benefits of positive behaviour. When children have opportunities to contribute to decisions and participate collaboratively with others in everyday settings, they learn to live interdependently and make informed choices (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). The service should ensure that all children are supported to develop the skills, learning dispositions and understandings they need to interact with others, with care, empathy and respect.
Educators and co-ordinators can assist by developing:
- positive and respectful strategies for guiding children’s behaviour, and helping children to respectfully negotiate their requests with others
- strategies that demonstrate respect and understanding of individual children when they strive to recognise and understand why each child may behave in a certain way, or why behaviour may occur in particular circumstances or at specific times of the day.
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 5.2 (for all services)
Supporting sensitive and responsive relationships
|
|
Collaborative learning
|
Guiding children’s behaviour
|
|
|
Element 5.2.1: Collaborative learning
What Element 5.2.1 aims to achieve
Services provide a range of opportunities for children to learn how to work with others collaboratively, respectfully and effectively, including through play experiences. Educators can support children to learn about and experience cooperation by modelling cooperative behaviour themselves and acknowledging cooperation when it occurs. As children develop their social skills, educators provide time and space for children to engage in collaborative experiences. These enjoyable experiences help children to learn about their responsibilities to others and to appreciate their connectedness and interdependence as learners. They learn to balance their own needs and wants with those of other children. By nurturing respectful and reciprocal relationships among children, educators support children to value collaboration and teamwork.
School age care settings are places for children to learn more about themselves, others and the world as they increasingly cooperate and work collaboratively with others. By encouraging children’s active involvement in learning experiences, children learn to explore and solve problems and develop greater capacity for independence and collaboration. Older children can challenge and extend their own thinking, and that of others, and create new knowledge in collaborative interactions and negotiations with peers. By exchanging ideas and collaborating with others, older children can also learn life and social skills, such as conflict resolution and negotiation skills.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 5.2.1 (for all services)
Supporting cooperation and collaboration
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
|
Element 5.2.2: Self-regulation
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 5.2.2Section 166 Offence to use inappropriate discipline Regulation 155 Interactions with children Regulation 156 Relationships in groups |
What Element 5.2.2 aims to achieve
Self-regulation becomes increasingly important as children move through childhood. They become more mindful of the way others interact with them, and at the same time develop understandings of how their actions affect the way others feel and behave. Educators work with young children to promote and model positive ways to relate to others. This includes role modelling and supporting children to convey and construct messages with purpose and confidence, for example when expressing needs, resolving conflict or responding to the behaviour of others.
Educators actively support the inclusion of all children in play, assist children to recognise when play is unfair, and offer constructive ways to build a caring, fair and inclusive learning community.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 5.2.2 (for all services)
Relating positively with others
Assessors may observe:
|
|
Assessors may discuss how:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 5.2: Relationships between children
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 5.2.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 5.2
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
Quality Area 6: Collaborative partnerships with families and communities
Overview
Quality Area 6 focuses on supportive, respectful relationships with families which are fundamental to achieving quality outcomes for children. Community partnerships that are based on active communication, consultation and collaboration also contribute to children’s inclusion, learning and wellbeing.
Families are the primary influence in their children’s lives; they often have strong beliefs and values regarding the education and care of their children. When families and services collaborate and build respectful relationships, children have the opportunity to develop a positive sense of self and experience respectful relationships. As well, the child, the family and the service do not exist in isolation; they are part of a much wider community. Children benefit from services engaging with local communities because these partnerships strengthen children’s interest and skills in being active contributors to their community. Collaborative partnerships are achieved when the service’s philosophy has a strong commitment to valuing diversity, inclusive practice, creating culturally safe and secure environments and connecting to the community. To help services be prepared to engage all children in the educational program, services may also develop specific plans (for example a Strategic Inclusion Plan) to ensure the service is ‘inclusion ready’.
Partnerships involve educators, families, other professionals, community members and teachers in schools working together for the best interests of children. Educators create opportunities for open and authentic partnerships with all families, communities and organisations, including with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and organisations and those from culturally diverse backgrounds (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are the longest surviving Indigenous culture in the world and the custodians of this land. Through genuine and sustainable partnerships with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and organisations, as well as culturally responsive practices, educators can ensure the history and culture of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is respectfully and truthfully reflected throughout the service and its program, for the benefit of all children. The contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people – past and present – should be acknowledged and valued in children’s learning and throughout the service’s program (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Related National Law
A number of the guiding principles that underpin the National Law support services’ engagement with Quality Area 6. These principles are:
- that the principles of equity, inclusion and diversity underlie the National Law
- that Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures are valued
- that the role of parents and families is respected and supported
(see section 3(3) of the National Law).
Standards, elements and concepts
Quality Area 6 has two Standards that support building collaborative partnerships with families and communities to enhance children’s inclusion, learning and wellbeing as they transition through the early years into school and/or attend outside school hours care services. These Standards are crucial to delivering quality outcomes for children under the National Quality Framework because:
- authentic family engagement encourages the active participation of each child and their family in service decisions and the educational program
- reflecting on inclusive practice helps the service to identify and remove potential barriers to an inclusive environment and support the wellbeing of all children and families
- community engagement helps the service to build relationships between each child, the families of the service and the community they reside in, and encourages each child to develop their identity within the context of their local community
- as well as enriching programs, practices and policies, it provides an opportunity to support children to respect and value diversity.
Standard/Elements | Concept | Descriptor |
QA6 | Collaborative partnerships with families and communities | |
6.1 | Supportive relationships with families | Respectful relationships with families are developed and maintained and families are supported in their parenting role. |
6.1.1 | Engagement with the service | Families are supported from enrolment to be involved in the service and contribute to service decisions. |
6.1.2 | Parent views are respected | The expertise, culture, values and beliefs of families are respected and families share in decision-making about their child’s learning and wellbeing. |
6.1.3 | Families are supported | Current information is available to families about the service and relevant community services and resources to support parenting and family wellbeing. |
6.2 | Collaborative partnerships | Collaborative partnerships enhance children’s inclusion, learning and wellbeing. |
6.2.1 | Transitions | Continuity of learning and transitions for each child are supported by sharing information and clarifying responsibilities. |
6.2.2 | Access and participation | Effective partnerships support children's access, inclusion and participation in the program. |
6.2.3 | Community engagement | The service builds relationships and engages with its community. |
Standard 6.1: Supportive relationships with families
How Standard 6.1 contributes to quality education and care
Standard 6.1 acknowledges that the family is the most powerful influence on each child’s life and that learning outcomes are most likely to be achieved when educators work in partnership with families to ensure the experiences planned for children are meaningful (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). This Standard also recognises that each family’s wellbeing and capacity to nurture and support their children, is influenced by the community in which they live and the material resources and social supports available to them.
Educators recognise the diversity of families and that families are children and young people’s first and most influential teachers. They create a welcoming and culturally safe and responsive environment where all children and young people and their families are respected regardless of background, ethnicity, languages spoken, religion, family makeup or gender (Early Years Learning Framework: Framework for School Age Care).
Children have diverse understandings of ‘family’ and unique relationships with those who feature prominently in their lives. Services that reflect on what the concept of family means to each child can nurture the important relationships that exist between children and their families. For example, services need to recognise the importance of extended families, kinship systems, carers and guardians in children’s lives.
Effective, respectful communication between educators and families builds shared understanding of each other’s expectations and attitudes, and builds on the strength of each other’s knowledge. When educators respect the diversity of families and communities, and the aspirations they hold for their children and young people, they can nurture and foster children and young people’s wellbeing, learning, and development (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Sometimes family aspirations and expectations can be in conflict with service philosophy and practice. Open, respectful and non-judgmental communication between educators and families builds a shared understanding of children’s learning and participation.
Collaborative partnerships with families contribute to building a strong, inclusive community within the service. Respectful, honest and open two-way communication with educators assists families to feel connected with their children’s experience in education and care and helps them develop trust and confidence in the service. The service also supports families in their parenting role by becoming a reliable source of practical information about resources and services within the local community and by helping families to understand what constitutes quality practice.
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 6.1 (for all services)
Respectful and inclusive relationships with families
|
Supporting families in their parenting role
|
Element 6.1.1: Engagement with the service
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 6.1.1Regulation 157 Access for parents |
What Element 6.1.1 aims to achieve
Families’ first major engagement with the service occurs during the enrolment process. The enrolment process presents an opportunity for services to share information about its operations, philosophy and governance with families. Services can also encourage families to express their preferences about how the orientation of their child into the service will occur. This helps families to feel supported from the beginning and to understand that the service values their input about what is best for their child.
When families are given the opportunity to provide information about their children that will assist educators to get to know them and help them settle into the program, families feel that their suggestions are clearly valued and that they are regarded as partners in their child’s experience at the service. This partnership between the service and the family strengthens when educators seek further information from families while assessing children’s progress and planning their individual goals.
Services encourage families to become involved in ways that suit their current commitments, availability and skills. For example, families can contribute to service processes, such as reviewing the service philosophy and self-assessments, revising policies and procedures, and identifying goals for the Quality Improvement Plan.
When services seek and encourage families’ meaningful involvement in the service, families are included as co-contributors to decisions and are able to influence service programs, policies and planning processes. Services may use a range of strategies to cater to the diversity of family preferences on information sharing and engagement.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 6.1.1 (for all services)
Enrolment and settling-in process
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
Family involvement and contribution to service decisions
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
Element 6.1.2: Parent views are respected
What Element 6.1.2 aims to achieve
Educators recognise that families are children’s first and most influential teachers, and that the views of parents should be respected (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care). Children are born belonging to a culture, which is not only influenced by traditional practices, heritage and ancestral knowledge, but also by the experiences, values and beliefs of individual families and communities (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
When educators communicate with families to find out about their child’s evolving preferences, experiences and routines, and respect the expertise, cultures, languages, values, beliefs and child-rearing practices of families, they are able to:
- better support each child’s learning, development and wellbeing
- develop a tailored educational program that builds on each child’s background, strengths and promotes their development
- support families' diverse parenting practices and approaches (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
In a service environment where families are respected and share in decision- making, families and educators are supported to value each other’s knowledge and roles, and communicate and share information safely and respectfully. Ethical partnerships between educators and families are formed when information is exchanged responsibly, and educators take safety precautions to ensure children and young people’s right to privacy and protection, particularly with the sharing of information through media and digital technologies. Genuine partnership relationships which include shared decision-making with families enable educators to learn about other ways of knowing, being, doing and thinking, and support consistency between children’s experiences at home and at the service. Genuine partnerships positively enhance children’s learning, development, wellbeing and inclusion (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Assessment guide for meeting Element 6.1.2 (for all services)
Respecting families and sharing decision-making
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight evidence that:
|
Element 6.1.3: Families are supported
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 6.1.3Section 175 Offence relating to requirement to keep enrolment and other documents |
What Element 6.1.3 aims to achieve
Services use a variety of methods to support families and keep them informed of the details about their child’s learning, development and wellbeing, as well as the operational aspects of the service. This includes informing families about the service’s ongoing self-assessment in relation to the National Quality Standard, quality improvements being achieved, as well as their participation in, and outcome of, the assessment and rating process.
Educators and co-ordinators are able to support families in their parenting role by being readily available for informal discussions with them at mutually convenient times. Further support is offered by referring families to current information on parenting and family issues displayed in the service, as well as referring them to recognised parenting and child development websites.
Providing easily accessible and reliable information about support networks and local community services helps families to make connections and use resources that support parenting. Improving the wellbeing of families is an important contributing factor in improving children’s overall wellbeing. School age care educators facilitate communication between families and the schools their children attend.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 6.1.3 (for all services)
Providing information about the service and other community services
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 6.1: Supportive relationships with families
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 6.1.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 6.1
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Standard 6.2: Collaborative partnerships
How Standard 6.2 contributes to quality education and care
Standard 6.2 recognises the connections between children, families, the service and communities and the importance of reciprocal relationships and partnerships in enhancing all children’s inclusion, learning, development and wellbeing (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
When working with families, the service understands the importance of seeing families in the context of their participation in the local community and wider society. Services can also establish and maintain an active presence in the local community, seek to strengthen community links and use community resources to support families. This supports the inclusion of all children in their community and broadens children’s understanding of the world in which they live and of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander history and culture within the context of their own community. Educators work to build trusting relationships with families, Elders and communities so that histories, stories and languages, as well as the local knowledge of how the Traditional Owners care for and sustain the land, are shared with all children (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Open communication and collaboration between the service, families, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Elders and community members, and other professionals within the community can be mutually beneficial. These partnerships:
- build the relationships between each child, their families and the service so that each child’s capacity to fully participate in the program is supported
- assist children to become aware of the similarities, differences and connections between people within the community
- can provide everyone with a holistic understanding of each child, which contributes positively to every child’s inclusion, learning, development and wellbeing
- create opportunities to develop a shared understanding about inclusion
- provide opportunities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children to see themselves, their identities and cultures reflected in their environment, and build the knowledge of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives for all children (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
- give families an opportunity to provide information about their child’s interests, strengths and abilities, as well as provide feedback that assists educators to develop programs that are focused on supporting the learning and development of every child
- build the capacity of organisations involved in supporting children and families in the local community
- are more likely to result in information sharing and collaborative problem-solving
- assist in building an environment that supports inclusion and celebrates diversity
- are built on understanding children’s and families’ right to privacy and confidentiality (see Element 7.1.2).
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 6.2 (for all services)
Building collaborative partnerships
|
Element 6.2.1: Transitions
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 6.2.1Section 175 Offence relating to requirement to keep enrolment and other documents Regulation 102AAB Safe arrival of children policies and procedures Regulation 102AAC Risk assessment for the purposes of safe arrival of children policies and procedures |
What Element 6.2.1 aims to achieve
Transitions can occur every day between routines, play spaces, or settings, as well as transitions between home, education and care settings, and school. Transitions in early childhood education settings occur:
- from home to the education and care setting
- between rooms and groups in a setting
- between settings
- between education and care settings and school
- between routines and experiences
- from one educator to another
- from indoor to outdoor play spaces
- to and from mealtimes and sleep or rest times (Early Years Learning Framework).
Transitions offer opportunities and challenges for children as different spaces and settings have different purposes, expectations and practices. Working collaboratively with families, other educators, and other professional services, educators support children to actively prepare for transitions between settings and experiences by:
- helping children and young people to understand the traditions, routines and practices of different settings, and building resilience to feel comfortable with the process of change
- sharing information about each child’s knowledge, skills, learning, strengths and interests to support educators in a new setting or group to build on these foundations
- building on children’s funds of knowledge to help them to feel secure, confident and connected to familiar people, places, events and understandings (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Policies and procedures
Approved providers must ensure that each service has a policy and procedures in place for the safe arrival of children who travel to or from the education and care services. These must set out the procedures to ensure the safe arrival of children who travel between the service and any other education or early childhood service. An education or early childhood service is:
- a school
- an education and care service
- a children's service, or
- any other service which provides education and care to children.
When preparing these policies and procedures, the service must consult their staff, parents and (if applicable) children at the service.
Policies and procedures should clearly specify who holds the duty of care for children during these periods of travel. Services should ensure this information is clearly communicated to and understood by families, all educators and school-based staff. The supervision of children during their travel to and from the service is important given the heightened risk to the safety and wellbeing of children during these times.
The policy and procedures must also include a risk assessment, which is to be conducted at least once every 12 months and as soon as practicable after becoming aware of any circumstance that may affect the safe arrival of children travelling between the service and any other education or early childhood service.
The purpose of the risk assessment is to identify and assess any risks that a child’s travel between an education and care service and any other education or early childhood service may pose to the safety, health or wellbeing of the child. A risk assessment must also specify how the identified risks will be managed and minimised. Some of the things a risk assessment must consider include:
- the age, developmental stage and individual needs of the child
- the role and responsibilities of;
- the nominated supervisor of each service the child will travel to or from
- the child's parent
- an authorised nominee named in the enrolment record
- a person authorised by either the child’s parent or an authorised nominee in the enrolment record, and
- the service the care of which the child is entering or leaving
- the communication arrangements between the service the child is leaving and the service the child is entering, including any communication arrangements if the child is missing or cannot be accounted for during the child's travel
- the procedure if the service has identified a child is missing or cannot be accounted for during their travel
- given the risks posed by the child’s travel, the number of educators or other responsible adults that is appropriate to provide supervision
- the proposed route and destination, including any proximity to harm and hazards
- the process for entering and exiting both the service premises and the pick-up location or destination (as required)
- the procedure to be followed by the service to ensure the child leaves the service premises in accordance with regulation 99(4)(b).
The policies and procedures must be updated as soon as practicable if a risk related to the child’s travel is identified after a risk assessment is conducted.
A record of the risk assessment must be kept by the approved provider. Failure to conduct the risk assessment may attract a compliance notice and a $2,200 penalty.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 6.2.1 (for all services)
Supporting smooth transitions
Assessors may observe:
|
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
|
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
|
Element 6.2.2: Access and participation
What Element 6.2.2 aims to achieve
The inclusive practices of educators, and the partnerships they form with each child and their families, have a significant effect on each child’s access, participation and success in learning. Educators’ attitudes, beliefs and values about inclusion are key factors for successful inclusion. Children thrive when families, educators, local schools and the wider community work together in partnership to support their access, inclusion and participation.
Services can support each child’s access, inclusion and participation in the program by learning about their individual context (family circumstances, geographic location, cultural and linguistic experiences) as well as their interests, learning styles, strengths and abilities. The educational leader and educators use this knowledge when making decisions about the physical environment, the curriculum and the day to day routines, rituals and transitions. To support all children’s inclusion, they recognise and respond to barriers that some children face, including attitudinal and practical barriers. Such barriers can be related to disability, family diversity, cultural and linguistic diversity, neurodiversity, and children and families living through trauma and adversity. Educators ensure that there are no barriers to children’s participation in any aspect of the program (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
By developing their professional knowledge and skills, and working in collaborative partnership with children, families and other services within the community, educators continually strive to find equitable and effective ways to ensure that all children have opportunities to experience quality learning regardless of circumstances, strengths, gender, capabilities, or diverse ways of being and doing. Educators create inclusive learning environments and adopt flexible and informed practices, including making reasonable adjustments to optimise participation and engagement in learning. This supports wellbeing and positive outcomes for children in all their diversities (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Planning and reflecting on practices, programs and policies assists educators to ensure that potential barriers to participation are addressed, each child is participating in the educational program, and services are ‘inclusion-ready’ and welcoming.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 6.2.2 (for all services)
Supporting children’s access, inclusion and participation
Assessors may observe:
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Element 6.2.3: Community engagement
What Element 6.2.3 aims to achieve
Services can further support children’s sense of belonging by helping them to experience connections and be engaged with their local community. When services develop respectful and responsive connections with their immediate or wider community, they are likely to further enrich the educational program for all children. Inviting members of diverse groups within the community to share their interests and expertise helps to extend children’s knowledge, and assists the service to reflect on the inclusiveness of its practices. This broadens children’s understanding of the world in which they live and contribute.
Building connections and relationships with people in the community helps children to learn more about various cultures that exist within Australia. Educators engage with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people about how to embed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives in the philosophy of the setting, their planning and implementation of curriculum. The history and culture of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is respectfully and truthfully reflected through community involvement and culturally sensitive practices (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Having opportunities to visit places in the community helps children to form relationships with a broad range of people from the community, and to build respect and trust in adults outside their immediate family and service.
Children and young people have opportunities to be experience and participate in multiple communities. This allows older children to develop their capacity for independence and self-direction (Framework for School Age Care).
Assessment guide for meeting Element 6.2.3
Community engagement
Assessors may observe:
|
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 6.2: Collaborative partnerships
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 6.2.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 6.2
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Quality Area 7: Governance and leadership
Overview
Quality Area 7 focuses on effective leadership and governance of the service to establish and maintain quality environments for children’s learning and development. Effective leaders establish shared values for the service that reflect the service context and professionalism and set clear direction for the service’s continuous improvement. Governance refers to the systems in place to support effective management and operation of the service, consistent with the service’s statement of philosophy.
To achieve the best outcomes for children and families, a service requires a skilled and engaged workforce, sound administrative and risk management systems, well-documented policies and procedures, and a safe and healthy learning environment for children.
Effective evaluation and self-review enables a service to continuously improve their practice, policies and procedures. An ongoing cycle of self-assessment, planning and review, together with engagement with all stakeholders including families, creates a culture of continuous improvement at the service.
Educational leaders exercise collaborative leadership and teamwork by supporting educators, through professional and respectful conversations, to reflect on their practice and identify opportunities for improvement. Collaborative leadership and teamwork support a culture of peer mentoring and shared learning, where all team members contribute to and facilitate each other’s professional learning and growth (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Standards, elements and concepts
Quality Area 7 has two Standards that focus on governance and leadership at the service. These Standards are crucial to delivering quality outcomes for children under the National Quality Framework because:
- effective governance requires a statement of philosophy, adequate management systems and clearly delineated roles and responsibilities to support the effective operation of a quality service
- effective leadership establishes a culture of reflective practice to encourage continuous improvement across all aspects of the service, resulting in a higher quality service for children and their families.
Standard/Element | Concept | Descriptor |
QA7 | Governance and Leadership | |
7.1 | Governance | Governance supports the operation of a quality service. |
7.1.1 | Service philosophy and purpose | A statement of philosophy guides all aspects of the service’s operations. |
7.1.2 | Management systems | Systems are in place to manage risk and enable the effective management and operation of a quality service. |
7.1.3 | Roles and responsibilities | Roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, and understood, and support effective decision-making and operation of the service. |
7.2 | Leadership | Effective leadership builds and promotes a positive organisational culture and professional learning community. |
7.2.1 | Continuous improvement | There is an effective self-assessment and quality improvement process in place. |
7.2.2 | Educational leadership | The educational leader is supported and leads the development and implementation of the educational program and assessment and planning cycle. |
7.2.3 | Development of professionals | Educators, co-ordinators and staff members’ performance is regularly evaluated and individual plans are in place to support learning and development. |
Standard 7.1: Governance
How Standard 7.1 contributes to quality education and care
Governance provides leadership and direction to the service. The approved provider must ensure that there are effective systems, procedures and processes in place to support the service to operate effectively and ethically. This promotes the confidence of families and local community in the service.
An effective governance framework includes:
- a statement of philosophy based on the service’s beliefs, values and aims for the educational program that the framework provides
- an effective and efficient management system to:
- enable the operation of a quality service
- ensure that all aspects of its operations, including policies and procedures, are consistent with the principles underlying the National Law, National Regulations and any other legislation that applies to the service
- manage foreseeable and long-term risks to the service’s operations and to children while they attend the service
- ethical codes and practices that guide decision-making
- clearly defined roles and responsibilities that support effective decision-making and operation of the service
- an effective complaints management process
- a continuous improvement approach to all aspects of the service and its educational program.
By establishing effective administrative and records management systems and implementing documented policies and procedures, the service can focus on delivering quality education and care for children and families.
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 7.1 (for all services)
|
Element 7.1.1: Service philosophy and purpose
What Element 7.1.1 aims to achieve
A written statement of philosophy outlines the purpose and principles under which the service operates. It also reflects the guiding principles of the National Quality Framework (see section 3(3) of the National Law), and the approved learning frameworks (see Element 1.1.1).
A statement of philosophy serves three purposes. It:
- underpins the decisions, policies and daily practices of the service
- reflects a shared understanding of the role of the service among staff, children, families and the community
- guides educators’ pedagogy, planning and practice when delivering the educational program.
When the educational leader, nominated supervisors, co-ordinators and educators contribute to the review of a philosophy statement, it is more likely to be owned by all members of the team. It encourages commitment and willingness to put it into practice.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 7.1.1 (for all services)
Service philosophy
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Element 7.1.2: Management systems
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 7.1.2Section 21 Reassessment of fitness and propriety Section 51(2) Conditions on service approval (FDC co-ordinators) Section 56 Notice of addition of nominated supervisor Section 56A Notice of change of a nominated supervisor’s name or contact details Section 161 Offence to operate education and care service without nominated supervisor Section 161A Offence for nominated supervisor not to meet prescribed minimum requirements Section 162 Offence to operate education and care service unless responsible person is present Section 162A Persons in day-to-day charge, nominated supervisors and family day care co-ordinators to have child protection training Section 163 Offence relating to appointment or engagement of family day care co-ordinators Section 164 Offence relating to assistance to family day care educators Section 164A Offence relating to the education and care of children by family day care service Section 165 Offence to inadequately supervise children Section 166 Offence to use inappropriate discipline Section 167 Offence relating to protection of children from harm and hazards Section 168 Offence relating to required programs Section 169 Offence relating to staffing arrangements Section 170 Offence relating to unauthorised persons on education and care service premises Section 171 Offence relating to direction to exclude inappropriate persons from education and care service premises Section 172 Offence to fail to display prescribed information Section 173 Offence to fail to notify certain circumstances to Regulatory Authority Section 174 Offence to fail to notify certain information to Regulatory Authority Section 174A Family day care educator to notify certain information to approved provider Section 175 Offence relating to requirement to keep enrolment and other documents Section 188 Offence to engage person to whom prohibition notice applies Section 269 Register of family day care educators, co-ordinators and assistants Regulation 158 Children’s attendance record to be kept by approved provider Regulation 159 Children’s attendance record to be kept by family day care educator Regulation 160 Child enrolment records to be kept by approved provider and family day care educator Regulation 161 Authorisations to be kept in enrolment record Regulation 162 Health information to be kept in enrolment record Regulation 163 Residents at family day care residence and family day care educator assistants to be fit and proper persons Regulation 164 Requirement for notice in relation to persons at residence Regulation 165 Record of visitors Regulation 166 Children not to be alone with visitors Regulation 167 Record of service’s compliance Regulation 168 Education and care service must have policies and procedures Regulation 169 Additional policies and procedures Regulation 170 Policies and procedures to be followed Regulation 171 Policies and procedures to be kept available Regulation 172 Notification of change to policies and procedures Regulation 173 Prescribed information to be displayed—education and care service other than a family day care service Regulation 173A Prescribed information to be displayed—family day care service Regulation 174 Time to notify certain circumstances to Regulatory Authority Regulation 174A Prescribed information to accompany notice Regulation 175 Prescribed information to be notified to Regulatory Authority Regulation 176 Time to notify certain information to Regulatory Authority Regulation 176A Prescribed information to be notified to approved provider by family day care educator Regulation 177 Prescribed enrolment and other documents to be kept by approved provider Regulation 178 Prescribed enrolment and other documents to be kept by family day care educator Regulation 179 Family day car educator to provide documents on leaving service Regulation 180 Evidence of prescribed insurance Regulation 181 Confidentiality of records kept by approved provider Regulation 182 Confidentiality of records kept by family day care educator Regulation 183 Storage of records and other documents Regulation 184 Storage of records after service approval transferred Regulation 185 Law and regulations to be available Jurisdiction specific provisionsTasmania – Regulation 344 Working with vulnerable people registration—staff members Victoria – Regulation 358 Working with children check to be read Victoria – Regulation 359 Criminal history record check to be read and considered |
What Element 7.1.2 aims to achieve
Efficient and effective systems
Efficient and effective management systems allow the service to identify and manage organisational risks in a timely manner, and carry out risks assessments as required to manage foreseeable risks to children’s safety and wellbeing (see Element 2.2.1). Effective management systems support the educational leader, nominated supervisor and educators in their planning, delivery and reflection on the educational program, and the development of strategies to continuously improve. When educators have adequate time and administrative support to perform their roles, they can focus on delivering a quality service to children and their families.
Confidentiality and records management systems
Services are required to safely store and maintain the confidentiality and currency of information provided by families, service staff and other stakeholders. This builds families’ confidence in the service’s records management practices, and is an indicator of the level of professionalism at the service.
Administrative systems
The approved provider is required to:
- ensure that the service operates in compliance with the National Law, the National Regulations and the National Quality Standard
- liaise with the regulatory authority when required.
The approved provider must ensure that there are adequate systems in place to maintain the effective, compliant operation of the service.
Complaints management system
An effective complaints and grievance management system confirms to staff, families and the community that complaints and grievances are taken seriously and investigated promptly, fairly and thoroughly. Effective management of complaints may inform quality improvement processes and is an efficient way of considering and acting on feedback from families.
Notifying the regulatory authority of operational changes, incidents and complaints
The approved provider must notify the regulatory authority of certain circumstances and information, including any:
- significant changes to the operation of the service, including changes to the hours and days of operation of the service, and, for centre-based services, if the service commences providing and/or arranging regular transport for children as part of the service, or if a service ceases providing and/or arranging regular transportation of children
- for centre-based services, any change to the range of ages of children to be educated or cared for by a service
- for centre-based services, any change to the nature of education and care to be provided by a service
- changes relevant to the fitness and propriety of the approved provider
- complaints that may impact on the regulatory authority’s consideration of provider or service approvals
- complaints alleging that a serious incident has occurred or is occurring while a child was or is being educated and cared for by the service*, or the National Law has been contravened
* In WA the approved provider must notify of complaints alleging that the safety, health or wellbeing of a child (or children) has been compromised, or the National Law has been contravened - serious incidents that occur at the service
- any incident where the approved provider reasonably believes that physical or sexual abuse of a child or children has occurred or is occurring while the child is being educated and cared for by the service.
Documented policies and procedures
The service should ensure that policies and procedures are well-documented, maintained and easily accessible to staff members and families. This supports the service to implement practices that are based on the service’s policies and procedures.
Regularly reviewing policies and procedures in collaboration with families supports a shared understanding of the service’s practices.
Risk management and employing fit and proper staff
Fitness and propriety describes a person’s suitability to be involved in the operation of an education and care service. Prior to granting provider approval or service approval, regulatory authorities assess whether the applicant applying for provider approval is fit and proper to provide an education and care service. The approved provider is responsible for assessing a person’s suitability for the roles of nominated supervisor and responsible person at the service.
The approved provider, nominated supervisor and responsible person must remain fit and proper for the service to operate under their management.
When a family day care service is provided in an educator’s home, adults who reside on the premises must be assessed as, and remain, fit and proper for the service to operate.
Checking and maintaining accurate records that relate to the fitness and propriety of all staff assists in safeguarding children against risks to their safety and wellbeing.
Thorough recruitment processes emphasising a commitment to children’s safety and wellbeing, including through advertisement, interview processes and candidate reference checks support a child safe organisational culture.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 7.1.2 (for all services)
Records management
Assessors may observe:
|
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative systems
Assessors may observe the availability of information technology for administration, planning, evaluation and communication purposes, including for communication with families.
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight examples of internal communications, such as meeting minutes, distribution of notices and staff bulletins.
Notifications to the regulatory authority
Assessors are unlikely to observe practice in relation to this element.
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Complaints management
Assessors are unlikely to observe practice in relation to this element.
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Documented policies and procedures
Assessors may observe that the service’s practices are consistent with documented policies and procedures.
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight the following required policies and procedures available at the service, which are also available to families:
|
|
Fit and proper staff
Assessors are unlikely to observe practice in relation to this element during a site visit.
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight evidence:
|
|
Element 7.1.3: Roles and responsibilities
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 7.1.3Section 51(2) Conditions on service approval (FDC co-ordinators) Section 163 Offence relating to appointment or engagement of family day care Section 164A Offence relating to the education and care of children by family day care service Section 174A Family day care educator to notify certain information to approved provider |
What Element 7.1.3 aims to achieve
Each individual who begins work at the service should have a clear understanding of their role, responsibilities and the expectations for their performance. They should be encouraged to engage with the philosophy and context that underpin the operation of the service as early as possible. A comprehensive induction process plays a critical role in creating and maintaining a positive and professional culture.
Services should foster a clear and open understanding of the staffing structure and responsibilities of all staff. This supports effective decision-making and efficient service operation.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 7.1.3 (for all services)
Roles and responsibilities
Assessors are unlikely to observe practice in relation to this element during a site visit.
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 7.1: Governance
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 7.1.
Authorised officers determine the rating of each Standard by considering each theme in relation to each Standard descriptor.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 7.1
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Standard 7.2: Leadership
How Standard 7.2 contributes to quality education and care
Effective leadership builds and maintains a professional workplace in which all staff members can communicate and raise issues openly, participate in respectful debate and contribute to each other’s ongoing professional learning.
A positive work culture that is focused on quality encourages management and staff to continuously improve the service for the benefit of children and their families. Building a positive culture and professional learning community involves:
- reflecting on and continuously questioning how to improve teaching methods, educators’ practices, curriculum quality, equity, and the wellbeing and inclusion of each child
- building staff members’ professional knowledge
- strengthening relationships with children and families
- establishing expectations for:
- the quality of education and care provided by nominated supervisors, educational leaders, educators and co-ordinators
- programs and practices that promote children’s wellbeing, learning and development.
To lead effectively, leaders need current, in-depth content knowledge as well as a deep understanding and appreciation of children’s learning and development. Research demonstrates that there is a strong link between leadership and improved outcomes for children. Effective leaders are clear about the purpose of education and care services and have the skills to effectively communicate shared goals and expectations.
To develop and maintain an organisational culture that is inclusive and promotes high expectations, leaders need to demonstrate ongoing commitment to equity, inclusion and a respect for diversity in all aspects of the service.
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 7.2 (for all services)
|
Element 7.2.1: Continuous improvement
National Law and National Regulations underpinning Element 7.2.1Regulation 31 Condition on service approval-quality improvement plan Regulation 55 Quality improvement plans Regulation 56 Review and revision of quality improvement plans |
What Element 7.2.1 aims to achieve
Quality services regularly monitor and review their performance to guide planning and improve service quality. This creates a shared understanding of the principles that guide the service, and encourages continuous improvement in practice, policies and procedures.
Quality services regularly update and maintain their Quality Improvement Plan as a dynamic document to guide progress towards improvement. Quality services use the Quality Improvement Plan for continuous assessment against the National Quality Standard and the approved learning frameworks, to identify new goals for the service as part of an effective cycle of improvement. Incorporating regular self-assessment and quality improvement discussions in staff meetings encourages educators to participate in reflection on key practices, such as pedagogy and inclusion, and enables all staff members to provide input into planning for continuous quality improvement.
Establishing and maintaining a culture of critically reflective practice and self-review offers challenge, inspires motivation, and supports positive levels of staff satisfaction. This provides opportunities for all staff to improve their practice and programming, which contributes directly to improved learning outcomes for children.
An effective cycle of continuous improvement includes reviewing:
- the extent to which the service meets or exceeds the National Quality Standard
- the performance of all staff members
- how the service and its practices are delivered in accordance with the Early Years Learning Framework and/or the Framework for School Age Care (or other approved learning frameworks)
- the outcomes for children at the service against the learning outcomes in these frameworks
- feedback and complaints from children and families.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 7.2.1 (for all services)
Regular self-assessment
Assessors may observe service practices and program delivery that match the service’s self- assessment, which is reflected in its Quality Improvement Plan.
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight:
|
Element 7.2.2: Educational leadership
What Element 7.2.2 aims to achieve
Educational leadership
The role of the educational leader is primarily to:
- collaborate with educators and provide curriculum direction and guidance
- support educators to effectively implement a continuous cycle of planning, assessment and critical reflection to enhance programs and practices
- lead the development and implementation of an effective educational program in the service
- ensure that children’s learning and development are guided by the learning outcomes of the Early Years Learning Framework and/or the Framework for School Age Care or other approved learning frameworks.
The educational leader of a service plays a significant role in guiding and developing educators’ and families’ understandings about play and leisure-based learning, and the significance of the early years in the education continuum for children. Their approach to leadership for learning has the potential to build the knowledge, skills and professionalism of educators, and to help communicate these important messages to families, schools and the broader community.
'A robust culture of critical reflection is established when educators as a team, as well as children and families, are all involved in an ongoing cycle of review. Current practices are examined, outcomes of those practices evaluated, new ideas generated, tried and tested. This approach supports educators to question established practices and to think about why they are working in particular ways. In such a climate, there is opportunity to engage in deep thinking about pedagogy, equity and children’s wellbeing' (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
Selecting and supporting the educational leader
Leadership in education and care is complex, multi-faceted and diverse. Emerging research on the role of educational leader in the Australian context demonstrates that this type of pedagogical leadership may present a range of challenges and require a different set of skills than other types of leaders within the service. It also recognised that for the educational leader to be successful in generating quality outcomes, they need to be supported in their role. An approved provider/nominated supervisor might consider the following skills, knowledge and attributes in nominating and developing the educational leader:
- communication and interpersonal skills
- comprehensive knowledge of theory that relates to early childhood education and care (for example, child development, attachment, learning), professional standards and approved learning frameworks, and contemporary understanding of evidence-based best practice approaches to teaching and learning
- knowledge of leadership theory and the use of a range of leadership styles
- thinking skills, including the ability to critically analyse and challenge conventional practice and ideas
- a sense of purpose and direction, and the ability to influence
- a willingness to mentor and support educators from diverse backgrounds and with varying levels of knowledge and experience
- commitment to learning and participating in professional learning opportunities.
Approved providers and nominated supervisors might also consider how they provide support for the educational leader and what the outcomes for the role might look like in terms of improved quality programs and practice. Some key features include enabling capacity building opportunities, empowering leaders and ensuring the role is well-resourced. Resources may include time, professional learning materials and opportunities, clearly defined role description, expectations, networking and collegial support opportunities.
Leading, developing and implementing the program
The educational leader provides guidance on educators’ pedagogy and professional practice, by supporting educators to build and nurture secure respectful relationships with children and families, and assisting educators to articulate how and why they make decisions about the curriculum/program.
An effective educational program includes realistic goals which have a clear purpose in line with the service’s philosophy (see Element 7.1.1). The educational program and practice reflect the vision, principles, practice and learning outcomes of an approved learning framework (see Element 1.1.1).
Other key aspects of the educational leader’s role in leading, developing and implementing the program include:
- mentoring and supporting educators’ understanding of educational program and practice, such as:
- how theory supports best practice in all parts of the program
- building relationships and interactions with children to assist their learning through play and leisure-based programs
- intentional teaching strategies and thoughtful, deliberate educator practices that support children’s wellbeing, learning and development
- routines and transitions
- providing for continuity of learning when children transition to, from or within the service
- developing documentation that is meaningful, relevant and promotes reflection on educators’ pedagogy and practice
- drawing on a range of understandings about learning theories and styles, as well as educators’ strengths, to develop educators’ professional skills and confidence
- encouraging and empowering educators to draw on their creativity, intuition, knowledge of child development, as well as children’s knowledge, identity and culture in their teaching and planning for learning
- promoting a culture of equity, inclusive and high expectations by supporting educators to create inclusive learning environments and adopt flexible and informed practices, including making reasonable adjustments to optimise access, participation and engagement in learning for all children and young people (Early Years Learning Framework; Framework for School Age Care).
- liaising with other early childhood education and care professionals (such as therapists, maternal and child health nurses, and early childhood intervention specialists)
- assisting educators to make connections in the community, including with diverse cultures and Aboriginal or Torres Strait Elders or their representatives
- encouraging educators to reflect on how they draw on diverse perspectives, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories, cultures, knowledge systems and language, in their teaching and planning for learning.
Assessment and planning cycle
An ongoing cycle of assessment and planning is critical to the delivery of a quality educational program. The educational leader plays a pivotal role in this process, including:
- leading educators to use current approaches to documentation and planning
- mentoring and supporting educators in how they assess learning
- ensuring that the assessment and planning cycle is applied to each child and the program as a whole (see Element 1.3.1); note some jurisdictions have different requirements for the program in school age services)
- assisting educators to understand and implement reflective practice (see Element 1.3.2)
- leading critical reflection discussions to examine program and practice, investigate alternative approaches and ways of thinking, identify quality improvements required and plan for improvements
- leading further discussions after educators have implemented a change to program or practice, and identifying if other improvements are needed
- communicating in sensitive and meaningful ways with families when they need more information about the educational program and/or their child’s learning
- assisting educators to create meaningful opportunities for children and young people and families to be involved in the ongoing cycle of review.
For more information about the assessment and planning cycle, see Standard 1.3 and Element 1.3.1.
Assessment guide for meeting Element 7.2.2 (for all services)
Educational leadership
Assessors may observe the educational leader working with educators to build capacity and understanding about their pedagogy and practice, including ways they assess, reflect on and plan for children’s learning.
Assessors may discuss:
|
Assessors may sight evidence of:
|
Element 7.2.3: Development of professionals
What Element 7.2.3 aims to achieve
A system of regular performance review alongside individual learning and development plans is essential to the development of skills and professional knowledge of educators. Performance planning and review ensures that the knowledge, skills and practices of educators and other staff members are current, and that areas requiring further development are addressed.
An effective performance review provides opportunities for educators to assess their own work performance against their job description, relevant code of ethics (for example Early Childhood Australia’s Code of Ethics) and the service’s code of conduct. The process recognises the specific strengths and contributions of each educator, which has the potential to encourage continuous quality practice and motivate them to continue to learn and develop professionally. Services can address areas that require improvement using a supportive and professional approach, to assist in accessing opportunities to engage in ongoing learning.
Educators who are committed to ongoing learning and performance improvement lift the quality of the service, potentially benefitting staff members, children, families and communities.
Learning and development can be enhanced when educational and/or service leaders (see Element 7.2.2) take on an active mentoring role, in collaboration with educators, to develop individual professional development plans that:
- develop educators’ professional knowledge, skills and practices
- support creativity, imagination, innovation and continuous quality improvement
- build an understanding of the influence of theories and beliefs
- support educators to develop their understanding of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and cultures and meaningfully and respectfully engage with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities
- support educators to stay abreast of current policies, practice and thinking (for example inclusive policies and practice).
For example, educational leaders can mentor new educators to develop their practice that is equitable, inclusive and promotes high expectations for all children and ensure that an inclusive philosophy underpins their pedagogy, program planning and interactions with each child and their families.
There is no one size fits all approach to the performance review, planning and improvement process. The main focus should be on developing an effective and efficient process for quality improvement. The outcome of the process is to:
- build and strengthen educators’ understanding of the National Quality Framework
- support the development of strategies, practices and processes to meet the Standards
- further educators’ knowledge of quality early childhood education practices and programs.
Effective performance reviews include the following components:
Planning
| Review
| Improvement
|
Assessment guide for meeting Element 7.2.3 (for all services)
Supporting staff learning and development
Assessors may observe the performance of each educator, co-ordinator and staff member supported by the educational leader and/or nominated supervisor.
Assessors may discuss:
|
|
Assessors may sight:
|
|
Exceeding guidance for Standard 7.2: Leadership
Overview
The following guidance is questions for services to ask of their own practice to consider whether their service Exceeds the NQS in Standard 7.2.
Authorised officers determine the rating of each Standard by considering each theme in relation to each Standard descriptor.
For further information on the three Exceeding themes, including what authorised officers consider when reviewing whether evidence demonstrates a theme, see Exceeding NQS theme guidance.
You can find case studies describing examples of practice for this Standard at https://www.acecqa.gov.au/assessment/exceeding-themes
Questions to guide reflection on practice for Standard 7.2
Exceeding theme 1: Practice is embedded in service operations
|
Exceeding theme 2: Practice is informed by critical reflection
How are all members of the service team:
|
Exceeding theme 3: Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community
|
Assessment and rating process
This chapter explains the assessment and rating process of education and care services and provides guidance on the self-assessment and quality improvement planning process. It also provides detail about how ratings are calculated and reviewed against the National Quality Standard.
1. Introduction
Services are assessed and rated against the National Quality Standard (NQS) to:
- promote continuous improvement in the provision of quality education and care
- improve knowledge and access to information about the quality of services to help families make informed decisions about their child’s education and care.
Services are assessed and rated against the NQS by the state or territory regulatory authority.
The National Regulations outline the assessment and rating (A&R) process for education and care services including the rating levels.
Notice of an assessment and rating visit
In most cases, regulatory authorities will provide at least 1-5 days notice that an assessment and rating visit or conversation will occur. For some services, such as some rural and remote services and single-educator models, longer notice will be provided to enable appropriate access to the service and availability of educators. The regulatory authority may commence an assessment and rating reassessment in response to compliance issues identified at the service. Where there have been compliance issues at the service, the regulatory authority may choose to commence the assessment and rating process without notice.
Summary of the assessment and rating process
Approved providers of new services will receive a letter informing them that an assessment and rating process will typically occur 9-18 months after the service begins operating.
Self-assessment and quality improvementApproved provider conducts a self-assessment of the quality of their current practices against the NQS and linked regulatory requirements. Approved provider identifies strengths and where improvements can be made which is documented in a Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) and uploaded to the NQA ITS or any other jurisdictional specific submission process. For new services this must occur within 3 months of receiving a service approval. |
|
Notice of visitRegulatory authority generally provides 1-5 days’ notice that a site visit will occur. When giving notice, the regulatory authority will consider the context of the service, and whether the regulatory authority is reasonably satisfied that typical practice can be observed at the service on the visit day. For partial reassessments that do not require a visit, the regulatory authority may provide 1-5 days’ notice that a conversation will occur instead of a visit. A&R that commences in response to compliance issues may be unannounced or commence with short notice. |
|
Information gatheringThe regulatory authority may contact you within this time for information in writing, by phone or video conference. |
|
Assessment and rating visit takes place at the service, if deemed necessary by the relevant regulatory authority. |
|
Draft reportRegulatory authority provides the approved provider with a draft assessment and rating report. |
|
|
Feedback on draft reportProvider can give feedback on any factual inaccuracies in the report and evidence to support feedback. |
Final report and notice of final ratings is issued to the providerFeedback considered before final report is finalised and issued. |
|
|
Final reportApproved provider may choose to apply for a review of final ratings within the set review period. |
Ratings published on national registersOnce the review period has ended, the final ratings are published on the national registers on the ACECQA website. |
|
2. Self-assessment and quality improvement planning
Ongoing self-assessment against the National Quality Standard (NQS) drives continuous improvement and is essential to providing quality outcomes for children.
Under the National Regulations, the approved provider must ensure a Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) is in place for each service.
The purpose of the QIP (or Self-Assessment Working Document in NSW) is to help providers self-assess their performance in delivering quality education and care, and to plan future improvements. The QIP also helps regulatory authorities with the assessment of the service. The QIP does not have to be provided in any specific format, but must include the three required components outlined below. The QIP can be uploaded to the NQA ITS or via any other jurisdictional specific submission process. The QIP is an enabler of continuous improvement and encourages self-reflection and self-assessment of quality areas. Whenever the QIP is updated, the uploaded version will need to be revised to reflect any changes because the uploaded version will be used by regulatory authorities for assessment and rating.
A QIP must:
- include an assessment by the approved provider of the quality of the practices of the service against the NQS and the National Law and Regulations
- identify areas that the approved provider considers may require improvement
- include a statement of philosophy for the service.
The following section explains the three components of the QIP.
Self-assessment
The first step in the quality improvement planning process is to conduct a self-assessment.
Self-assessment involves critically reflecting on current practice at the service, deciding what is being done well and identifying opportunities for improvement.
The approved provider, educators and management should be familiar with the NQS and related regulatory requirements and reflect on practice, policies and procedures against the seven (7) quality areas of the NQS and related regulatory requirements. This will provide an informed picture of:
- current practice
- the quality of education and care experienced by children and families.
This picture of current practice highlights and confirms the service’s strengths and is the starting point for planning to improve quality.
The National Quality Standard includes a set of reflective questions that serve as prompts to explore current practice at the service. This can assist the provider to think about how and why things are done in a particular way while reflecting on specific practices to determine the:
- effectiveness of practice for all children and families
- relevance of the practice to the service and its stakeholders
- equity and fairness of the practice for all children, families and educators.
Areas for improvement
Reflection determines quality improvements
Following the reflection and self-assessment of current practice in the service, the next step is to identify the opportunities where quality improvements can be made and to plan effectively to implement them.
It is important to be open, honest and critically reflective when undertaking the self-assessment and quality improvement planning processes.
Turning reflection into quality improvement strategies
The QIP must include strategies to address the areas for further improvement identified during the self-assessment process.
A service rated Meeting or Exceeding NQS in all quality areas should be able to demonstrate its ongoing commitment to continuous improvement by documenting how the service will continue to explore opportunities to improve quality.
Statement of philosophy
The statement of philosophy describes the service’s values, beliefs and understandings about children, families, the role of educators and the ways children learn. To meet the NQS, the statement of philosophy should be used to guide all aspects of the service’s operations.
It is recommended educators, families and children be involved in the development and review of the service’s philosophy statement. Critical reflection on the philosophy in light of new research, the approved learning frameworks, and families’ views and expectations supports the service’s goals for quality education and care, and continuous improvement.
A statement of philosophy: |
• describes the service’s values, beliefs and understandings |
• informs understanding of educators, children, families and the community |
• leads to improved practices, relationships, policies and procedures |
Quality Improvement Plan: the main points
Submit the plan: timeline for new services
The approved provider must ensure that a QIP (or a Self-Assessment Working Document in NSW) is prepared for a new service within three months of the service approval being granted, and must provide the QIP to the regulatory authority on request. Approved providers should ensure an up-to-date QIP is uploaded to the National Quality Agenda IT System portal or via any other jurisdiction specific submission process. The regulatory authority will use the uploaded QIP for assessment and rating purposes.
Update the plan: requirements for existing services
The QIP is designed to be a dynamic, evolving document which enables continuous improvement, self-assessment and self-reflection. Approved providers should ensure an up-to-date QIP is uploaded to the National Quality Agenda IT System portal or via any other jurisdiction specific submission process. The regulatory authority will use the uploaded QIP for assessment and rating purposes.
Review the plan annually
The approved provider must review and revise the QIP at least annually, having regard to the NQS, and at any time when directed by the regulatory authority. Approved providers should ensure an up-to-date QIP is uploaded to the National Quality Agenda IT System portal or via any other jurisdiction specific submission process. The regulatory authority will use the uploaded QIP for assessment and rating purposes. The provider must submit the most current copy of the QIP to the regulatory authority on request.
Developing the QIP
Visit the ACECQA website (acecqa.gov.au) to download an optional QIP template. Approved providers can use an alternate format however information required under regulation 55 must be included.
When writing the QIP, providers should reflect on the outcomes of the self-assessment process. Services may prioritise areas for improvement against the seven (7) quality areas of the NQS and the related regulatory requirements. There is no requirement that all 15 standards and 40 elements are addressed in the QIP. The QIP should include the key areas for improvement.
Services may have a range of documents that assist and record the planning process. The QIP is a summary of the key areas prioritised for improvement.
Collaborate when developing the plan
Developing the service’s plan can be a collaborative process which involves children, families, educators, staff members, management and other interested parties, such as representatives of the community or agencies that work with the service to support the inclusion of children.
Update the plan after assessment and rating
It is recommended the QIP is updated after the assessment and rating process is completed to reflect the outcomes of the assessment and rating process.
Keep a current QIP at the service and make it available to families and regulators
A service approval is granted subject to the condition that the approved provider ensure a current QIP is kept on the premises of the service at all times or, in the case of a family day care service, at the principal office of the family day care service.
The QIP must also be available on request for inspection by the regulatory authority and to parents of a child who is enrolled or who is seeking to enrol at the service.
3. The rating system
The rating levels under the National Law and Regulations are:
- Excellent rating (the criteria for this rating level is determined by ACECQA)
- Exceeding National Quality Standard
- Meeting National Quality Standard
- Working Towards National Quality Standard
- Significant Improvement Required.
Services that have not been assessed and rated hold the provisional rating of ‘Provisional – Not Yet Assessed’.
The rating certificate must be displayed at the approved education and care service at all times. A ratings certificate, which outlines the overall rating of the service and the current rating levels for each quality area, must also be clearly visible from the main entrance at each FDC residence or venue used to provide education and care to children as part of a family day care service.
What do the ratings mean
Assessment process
Under the National Regulations, for a first full assessment and rating, an authorised officer of the regulatory authority conducts an assessment and rating visit:
- of the service premises at a centre-based service
- of one or more approved family day care venues or residences for a family day care service.
As part of the assessment and rating process, the regulatory authority must consider:
- the current QIP for the service
- any rating assessment history of the service, including any records of previous rating assessments made under the National Law
- the service’s history of compliance.
The regulatory authority may also consider a range of information when determining a rating, including:
- information disclosed by a government department, public or local authority, state or territory regulatory authority or the relevant Commonwealth department
- steps taken by the service to address matters identified during the rating assessment
- other quality assurance or registration process under an education law applicable to the service
- in the case of a service that provides education and care to children in their year before school, whether the service facilitates access to a preschool program.
Reassessment process
A regulatory authority may choose to reassess a service once it has been assessed and rated. Reassessments may be full reassessments or a reassessment of any aspect or element of the service (a partial reassessment). A reassessment may or may not involve a site visit. When reassessing a service, the regulatory authority may consider any of the information it would consider as part of a first assessment and rating. The regulatory authority may also consider any changes made to the service since the last assessment.
Partial reassessments
Regulatory authorities use partial reassessments as one method of assessing the quality of education and care provided by services. Partial reassessments are a valuable tool to facilitate risk-based regulatory efforts and enable accurate and current information about services’ quality ratings for families and the community.
Partial reassessments may typically be used by a regulatory authority:
- In response to trends and risks identified in the sector or within a service. These may, for example, be identified through monitoring of compliance and/or in response to complaints or relevant notifications.
- To apply more targeted quality assessment and rating for services that have earned this approach through demonstrated consistent compliance and high quality over a sustained period
- If there are changes to a service since it was last assessed (including changes in a service’s operations, management, leadership or physical environment). These may be identified, for example, through relevant notifications to the regulatory authority.
Where appropriate to do so, a partial reassessment may be undertaken without a visit by the regulatory authority to the service (via a desktop review). A desktop review would be appropriate where the required evidence includes documentation for sighting or discussions that can be conducted virtually. If the authorised officer needs to observe practice to collect evidence to inform a rating, then a physical visit will be required.
Procedure for partial reassessments
Partial reassessments can only be undertaken on services that have already been fully assessed and rated under the current NQS. Services that have not been assessed and rated and services that were assessed and rated under the previous NQS (2012 version) are unable to be partially reassessed.
The regulatory authority can choose to add more areas to a partial reassessment at any time during the reassessment process, including during any visit. The regulatory authority and approved provider may discuss whether additional areas of the NQS should be reassessed as part of the reassessment. The regulatory authority's scheduling of assessment and rating visits, including partial reassessments initiated by the approved provider or the regulatory authority, is influenced by many factors. For more information about scheduling, refer to the 'Frequency of the assessment and rating cycle' section.
Regulatory authorities consider the methodology for how ratings are calculated under the NQS when considering how broad a focus a partial reassessment should have. For example, when considering a ‘not met’ element, it may be appropriate for a regulatory authority to gather evidence that may be pertinent across all elements of the parent standard, to determine the rating for the standard. This is because, if all elements are found to be met (even if one or more of those elements was found to be met at a prior assessment and rating), evidence against the Exceeding themes would need to be considered in determining the standard’s new rating.
Determining ratings after a partial reassessment
After carrying out a partial reassessment, the regulatory authority will determine the ratings relevant to the partial reassessment. Previously determined ratings are carried forward for the remaining ratings. First and second tier reviews are only available for the ratings that were determined as part of the partial reassessment. The ratings certificate will include ratings from the partial reassessment and any other ratings that were carried forward from a previous assessment, and the overall rating.
Regulatory oversight
Regulatory authorities maintain oversight of providers and their services in a variety of ways to assess and promote compliance with the National Law and Regulations. These may include physical visits, interviews, phone calls, emails, video conference, etc.
All of these forms of activity provide regulatory authorities with information about the quality of education and care provided to children and interactions with families.
All types of visits may be organised at short notice or without notice, and may focus on any aspect of service delivery under the NQF.
The form of activity is chosen by regulators based on an assessment of risk and the purpose of the contact, and may include a compliance visit, a partial assessment and rating, a full assessment and rating, or other regulatory activities.
Steps in the assessment and rating process
For a partial reassessment, the regulatory authority will use the most current version of the QIP that has been submitted. As part of the regulatory authority’s process, the authorised officer will analyse the available information about the service, including reviewing the compliance and rating history.
The following table outlines the steps and timelines in the assessment and rating process, including in relation to full and partial reassessments. The primary differences in process between an initial assessment and rating versus a reassessment are that:
- the first assessment and rating will always involve a visit to the service and will involve an assessment of all seven quality areas; and
- the service approval letter will explain that the service will need to prepare the QIP within 3 months. The first assessment and rating will typically occur within 9 - 18 months of operations commencing. It is expected that the provider will ensure the current version of the QIP is submitted to the regulatory authority via the National Quality Agenda IT System portal or via any other jurisdiction specific submission process.
These timeframes are guidelines only.
Timeline |
Step |
Process |
Week 1 |
A. Notice to approved provider of assessment and rating |
Approved provider is generally notified the assessment and rating visit (or conversation) will occur within 1-5 days. The notification may also include:
|
|
For family day care services, a visit will include attending the principal office of the family day care service and a sample of educators. The authorised officer will give notice of the educator sample to be visited either on the day of a visit or up to five days before a visit occurs. The provider may be asked to submit their family day care register to support this decision. |
|
Weeks 1 to 2 |
B. Visit occurs |
The authorised officer conducts any assessment visit and records observations and evidence. The authorised officer gathers evidence through a combination of observe, sight and discuss methods. If observations of practice are not required, this information may be gathered through sight and discuss methods. The authorised officer may provide details about post-visit opportunities to provide information (including if the key contact persons are unavailable on the visit day). The authorised officer may give some general feedback at the time of the visit but will not give an indication of the service rating. The authorised officer also gives the approved provider, at the time of assessment or as soon as practicable afterwards, an indication of any minor adjustments that may be made at the service before the draft assessment and rating report is issued to the approved provider. Any minor adjustments made by the service are included on the authorised officer’s notes and in the assessment and rating report. |
C. After the visit |
The authorised officer analyses the information gathered through the assessment and rating process, including whether there was any evidence of inconsistent practice at the service. The authorised officer may arrange the collection of additional sight and discuss evidence by phone, email or video conference. The authorised officer prepares the draft report with the proposed ratings. The authorised officer also:
|
|
Approx. 3–5 weeks after a visit |
D. Draft report |
The approved provider is issued the draft report and covering letter. The covering letter includes the contact details of the regulatory authority for providing feedback on any factual inaccuracies in the report and providing evidence to support their feedback. It also states that the draft report will become the final report if no feedback is received within ten (10) working days. |
E. Consider feedback |
The regulatory authority considers feedback received from the approved provider. |
|
Approx. 8 weeks after a visit |
F. Final report |
The report is finalised, the final ratings are determined and the notice of final ratings is issued to the approved provider. The regulatory authority informs the approved provider and provides information about the review process, including:
The approved provider has 14 days to apply for a first tier review. The 14 day period commences:
|
Before the assessment and rating visit
Before the visit, the approved provider determines who should be the key contact person. For example, this may be the approved provider themselves, a person in a management or control or a nominated supervisor.
Authorised officers will gain an understanding of the service before the visit by conducting a desktop review. For first full assessment and ratings, this review must include the service’s QIP (or self-assessment in NSW), assessment history and compliance history. Regulatory authorities will also review the service's QIP, assessment history and compliance history for reassessments. This desktop review contributes to the plan authorised officers develop for the visit.
Assessment and rating visit length
As a guide, it is expected that full assessment and rating visits for centre-based services will be for at least six (6) hours. There may be circumstances where this is not adhered to due to the size and configuration of the centre-based service.
For services providing multiple types of outside school hours care (e.g. before/after and vacation), it is likely that not all types of care will be visited in the assessment and rating process.
For family day care services, assessment and rating visits generally involve visits to:
- the service (scheme/coordination unit) at the beginning and or end of the assessment and rating visit
- a sample of one or more approved family day care venues or family day care residences. The regulatory authority will determine the sample from the register of family day care educators.
Frequency of the assessment and rating cycle
When regulatory authorities schedule quality rating assessments, the goal is to assess and rate the quality of services, drive continuous improvement and keep information for families and communities accurate and up to date.
To focus resources on services most in need of service improvement, the actions of regulatory authorities are responsive and risk-based. Services with a lower quality rating will be re-rated more frequently. Services with higher quality ratings will generally have a longer period of time between assessment and rating visits in recognition of their ability to operate above the NQS. Regulatory authorities may also schedule a service for a partial reassessment based on risk.
Regulatory authorities consider the following factors when managing assessment and rating schedules, including for partial reassessments instigated by the approved provider or the regulatory authority:
- The quality rating of a service when previously assessed, including results against the quality area, standard and element level – for example, services with three to five quality areas rated at Working Towards NQS may be reassessed more frequently than services with one or two quality areas rated at Working Towards NQS. Similarly, services rated Working Towards NQS in certain Standards, or for a higher number of Standards may also be reassessed more frequently.
- A change in service attributes that could be reasonably considered to affect the service’s quality – for example, changes in provider or service management.
- Changes in quality ratings over time.
- Events that occur at the service – for example, serious incidents, complaints or non-compliance with the National Law can indicate a change in quality and a higher scheduling priority. Unremedied breaches and patterns of non-compliance can also indicate a higher scheduling priority.
- Indicators that a service is failing to notify the regulatory authority of complaints or incidents.
- If the quality rating of the service conflicts with recent compliance history for a service.
- The length of time since the last monitoring or assessment visit.
- Service size - given larger services can have an impact on more children.
Each regulatory authority manages its assessment schedule in a responsive manner, making adjustments to the schedule as new information emerges and making best use of available resources.
4. How is an assessment and rating visit conducted?
Evidence collection
Authorised officers are trained to use ‘observe’, ‘discuss’ and ‘sight’ techniques to gather information and evidence that supports assessment of the service against the NQS, and the National Law and National Regulations.
Observe. The authorised officer may observe children, families, educators, directors, co-ordinators and staff members as part of the service’s practices. | |
Discuss. The authorised officer may discuss the service’s practices with the key contact person, educators, directors, co-ordinators, family day care educator assistants or staff members. | |
Sight. The authorised officer may sight documentation required by the National Law and Regulations, and other documentation as evidence of the service’s practices. |
For more guidance on how the elements of the NQS may be assessed, see the National Quality Standard.
Communication before and after the visit
The authorised officer may contact the provider of the service before and/or after an assessment and rating visit. This contact may be for example, by phone, video conference or email. The authorised officer may use this opportunity to discuss the service's practices, or request to sight documentation.
Communication during the visit
When visiting a service, the authorised officer(s) introduces themselves to the key contact person and explains what to expect in an assessment and rating visit, including how they will gather evidence (by observing, discussing and sighting evidence). Typically, the authorised officer will ask for a brief tour of the service and to be introduced to educators and staff.
During the visit, authorised officers will try to minimise disruption to practice, unless there is a significant risk to children.
Authorised officers may:
- inform the key contact person when taking breaks
- provide the key contact person with broad verbal feedback, but they cannot give an indication of the rating at this time
- advise of any matters where they can offer the Minor Adjustment Policy, and the timeframe to fix the issue/s.
The assessment and rating process is an important opportunity for providers to demonstrate how the service is delivering quality outcomes against the NQS for children in the context of the service, families and community.
The authorised officer should inform the service that a draft report with ratings for all quality areas and an overall rating will be provided approximately three to five weeks after the visit, and that the approved provider will have 10 working days to provide feedback on any inaccuracies in the report.
Reassessments may also be undertaken without a visit, if the evidence to be considered does not include observations of practice.
How are ratings determined?
After an assessment and rating visit occurs, the regulatory authority will:
- consider evidence provided by the approved provider where there have been minor adjustments
- determine the ratings, including assessing inconsistent practice where applicable.
The regulatory authority determines ratings by assessing each element of the NQS. Each standard and quality area is then rated. The overall rating is calculated based on these results.
Services must be rated Exceeding in all quality areas of the NQS to be eligible to apply to ACECQA for the Excellent rating.
Assessing elements
The authorised officer will assess each element as met or not met.
Assessing standards
The authorised officer will assess the evidence against each standard.
- If any element under a standard is not met, the rating for that standard will be Working Towards NQS.
- If all elements are met, the authorised officer will determine whether service practice for each standard represents what is expected at the Meeting level (Meeting NQS) or represents a level of quality above what is required at the Meeting level (Exceeding NQS).
- Each standard will be rated at either Meeting NQS or Exceeding NQS.
The following three themes must be demonstrated in service practice for a standard to be rated as Exceeding NQS:
Theme 1. Practice is embedded in service operations
Theme 2. Practice is informed by critical reflection
Theme 3. Practice is shaped by meaningful engagement with families and/or the community.
See Exceeding theme guidance for more information.
Determining quality area ratings
After the authorised officer has assessed each standard, the quality area ratings are calculated.
- If any standard within a quality area has been rated as Working Towards NQS, the rating for the quality area will be Working Towards NQS.
- If all standards within a quality area are rated at least Meeting NQS, the rating for that quality area will be at least Meeting NQS.
- If all standards within a quality area are rated Exceeding NQS, the rating for the quality area will be Exceeding NQS.
- If all standards within a quality area are rated at least Meeting NQS, but not all standards are rated Exceeding NQS, the rating for the quality area will be Meeting NQS.
Determining overall service ratings
- If any quality area has been rated as Working Towards NQS, the overall service rating cannot be higher than Working Towards NQS.
- If all quality areas are at least Meeting NQS and four or more quality areas are rated as Exceeding NQS, with at least two of these being quality areas 1, 5, 6, or 7, the overall rating will be Exceeding NQS.
- Services rated Exceeding NQS in all seven quality areas are eligible to apply to ACECQA for the Excellent rating.
The Significant Improvement Required rating
A rating of Significant Improvement Required can be applied at the standard and quality area level. If a rating of Significant Improvement Required is given for any standard or quality area, the overall service rating is Significant Improvement Required.
How quality rating levels are determined
The following table demonstrates how the authorised officer determines ratings by assessing each element against the NQS to determine if it is met or not met. This information is then used to rate each standard and quality area to determine the overall rating.
Task |
Rating Levels |
|||
Significant Improvement Required |
Working Towards National Quality Standard |
Meeting National Quality Standard |
Exceeding National Quality Standard |
|
1. Assess each element as ‘met’ or ‘not met’ |
Assess each element as ‘met’ or ‘not met’ and determine compliance with the relevant regulations. |
|||
2. Rate each standard |
A Significant Improvement Required rating may be given for a standard and/or quality area. |
Service does not meet one or more elements or relevant regulations for the standard. The service does not meet the standard. |
All elements and relevant regulations for the standard are 'met'. The service does not demonstrate the three Exceeding themes for the standard. The standard is rated Meeting NQS |
All elements and relevant regulations for the standard are 'met'. The service demonstrates the three Exceeding themes for the standard:
See Exceeding theme guidance for more information. |
3. Rate each quality area |
Service does not meet that quality area or a relevant regulation for that quality area and the regulatory authority is satisfied there is a significant risk to the safety, health or wellbeing of any child or children being educated and cared for by the service. |
Service does not meet a standard in that quality area or a relevant regulation for that quality area but is not rated as Significant Improvement Required (regulation 60(1)). |
Service meets the standards and relevant regulations for that quality area (regulation 61(1)). Some standards may be rated Exceeding in the quality area. |
Service exceeds the standards for that quality area and complies with the relevant regulations for that quality area (regulation 62(1)), subject to the following criteria: Criteria 1 If a service provides education and care for children who are in the year that is 2 years before grade 1 of school, the service can only be rated Exceeding NQS in Quality Area 1 if the service either:
Criteria 2 To be rated Exceeding NQS in a quality area:
|
4.Determine overall rating |
Overall rating is Significant Improvement Required if the service is rated Significant Improvement Required for any quality area (regulation 59(2)). |
Overall rating is Working Towards NQS if any quality areas are rated Working Towards NQS but the service does not have a Significant Improvement Required rating for any quality area (regulation 60(2)). |
Overall rating is Meeting NQS if all quality areas are rated Meeting NQS and/or Exceeding NQS but the service does not satisfy the requirements of regulation 62 for an overall Exceeding NQS rating (regulation 61(2)). |
Overall rating is Exceeding NQS if all quality areas are rated at least Meeting NQS, and four or more quality areas are Exceeding NQS, with at least two of these being quality areas 1, 5, 6 or 7. |
5. Making minor adjustments
The regulatory authority may consider any information available to them about any steps taken by the education and care service to rectify any matters identified during the rating assessment.
A service rating should accurately reflect service quality. Minor matters that do not seriously impact on a service’s quality may not affect the rating if they are able to be rectified quickly and easily. There may be some circumstances in which the regulatory authority gives an approved provider the opportunity to make minor adjustments prior to finalising a service’s assessment report and overall rating. If a minor adjustment could result in an individual element being assessed as ‘met’ instead of ‘not met’, the regulatory authority should consider offering a minor adjustment, even if other elements in the standard are ‘not met’.
The regulatory authority may give an approved provider a short time to make these minor adjustments in the following circumstances.
Circumstances in which minor adjustments may be offered |
There is no unacceptable risk to the safety, health or wellbeing of children |
The quality of service provided is minimally impacted |
Rectification can take place quickly and easily |
The matters to be adjusted are minor |
Elements that have been assessed as not met are elements where a minor adjustment could result in the element being met. The service may receive a higher rating against a standard if the issue is rectified |
The changes required involve simple, concrete solutions that can be implemented within the specified timeframe (e.g. within days of the assessment and rating visit, preferably immediately, unless otherwise specified by the regulatory authority). |
At the time of the assessment or soon after, the regulatory authority will inform the approved provider of the opportunity to make minor adjustments and provide evidence of those adjustments before the draft assessment and rating report is provided. The regulatory authority assesses whether the evidence provided demonstrates that an element assessed as ‘not met’ during the assessment and rating visit is now considered to be ‘met’.
The approved provider’s evidence must satisfy the regulatory authority that appropriate corrective action has been taken without the need to make a subsequent assessment and rating visit to the service. Examples of evidence could include:
- photographs (e.g. to demonstrate that a physical hazard has been removed or fixed, or to demonstrate that an item of documentation is now being displayed at the service)
- copies of revised written policies or procedures
- a record indicating that information has been provided to families attending the service (such as an email).
The evidence must satisfy the regulatory authority that the issue has been fully rectified. Evidence provided after the regulatory authority has issued the draft report to the approved provider for feedback will generally not be considered.
An approved provider may choose not to make minor adjustments, or not to provide evidence of minor adjustments, in which case the regulatory authority will draft the service’s assessment report and rating based on the circumstances of the service at the time of the assessment and rating visit.
Providing evidence to demonstrate that an issue has been rectified does not guarantee that the service will be assessed as having met the relevant element or standard.
The right to review
An approved provider cannot request a review of a decision made by the regulatory authority to apply the minor adjustments policy.
Assessing inconsistent quality
The term ‘inconsistent quality’ refers to situations where different levels of service quality are identified at an assessment and rating visit, including in different rooms, sessions, residences or venues or between different educators in the one room. The experiences of children within particular age groups or specific rooms within a service may be significantly different from what has been identified across the service. For example, experiences of some children in the service may be consistently below the NQS.
The final rating should take into consideration the impact this inconsistent quality has on the experiences of each child in the service.
The following flow chart provides guidance to authorised officers about assessing inconsistent quality.
6. Waivers
The impact of waivers on the assessment and rating process
A service granted a waiver can still achieve ratings of Meeting National Quality Standard and Exceeding National Quality Standard. For the purposes of an assessment, the service is either taken to comply or not required to comply with the requirements of the National Regulations that are covered by the waiver (see Applications and Approvals).
7. Evidence of non-compliance
Compliance issues identified through the assessment and rating process
In some cases where an element is not met, this may relate to non-compliance with the National Law and Regulations. The identified compliance issues may be reflected in the assessment and rating report and compliance action may be taken in parallel to the assessment and rating process (see Regulatory Authority Powers).
8. Significant Improvement Required
A rating of Significant Improvement Required can be applied at standard and quality area level. If a rating of Significant Improvement Required is given for any standard or quality area, the overall service rating is Significant Improvement Required.
Using the Significant Improvement Required rating
The Significant Improvement Required rating may be given when an authorised officer (in consultation with their manager) is satisfied that the service does not meet a standard, quality area, or relevant regulation for that quality area in a way that poses: ‘a significant risk to the safety, health or wellbeing of any child or children being educated and cared for by the service’ (regulation 59).
A significant risk is more likely to arise when there is non-compliance with the physical environment, children’s health and safety, or staffing requirements, but it could arise in other parts of the NQS. For example, poor educational programming requirements could pose a significant risk to the wellbeing of a child or children given the implications for children’s learning and development.
Determining ‘significant risk’ to a child or children
Authorised officers must always make a case-by-case assessment (in consultation with their manager) of whether there is a ‘significant risk to a child or children. Authorised officers may draw on a risk matrix to assist in determining the level of risk present and the appropriate course of action to address the risk. Further guidance on assessing risk is available in Good Regulatory Practice.
Risk Matrix |
||||||
Consequences |
Likelihood |
|||||
Rare |
Unlikely |
Possible |
Likely |
Almost Certain |
||
Major |
Moderate |
High |
High |
Critical |
Critical |
|
Significant |
Moderate |
Moderate |
High |
High |
Critical |
|
Moderate |
Low |
Moderate |
Moderate |
High |
High |
|
Minor |
Very low |
Low |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
Insignificant |
Very low |
Very low |
Low |
Moderate |
Moderate |
If the authorised officer determines that a ‘high’ or ‘critical’ level of risk to the health, safety or wellbeing of children is present as a result of service practice in a particular standard, quality area, or relevant regulation for that quality area, it is likely that further action would be taken.
Where an authorised officer identifies an issue that constitutes a significant risk, the authorised officer (in consultation with their manager) will need to decide whether it is appropriate to continue the visit. In the case that the assessment and rating visit is stopped, the authorised officer should ensure the decision to stop the visit is documented. If the risk can be satisfactorily addressed at the time of the visit, the assessment and rating visit may continue. The regulatory authority may choose to give the Significant Improvement Required rating for the standard or quality area where the risk was identified.
In general, authorised officers should seek to complete assessment and rating visits to ensure that sufficient evidence is gathered to allow the service to be rated against every standard. This also ensures that all major compliance issues at the service are identified. Regulatory authorities are required to give a rating for every quality area, even if one quality area is rated as Significant Improvement Required.
The assessment and rating process may only be suspended if the regulatory authority decides to take one of the actions outlined under section 137 of the National Law.
Suspending a rating assessment
The assessment and rating process can only be suspended if the regulatory authority decides to take one of the following actions:
Unless one of the actions listed in section